Costa M J, Kenny M B, Naib Z M
Department of Pathology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Acta Cytol. 1991 Jan-Feb;35(1):127-34.
To investigate the diagnostic accuracy and to characterize the findings in false-negative cases, the results of cervicovaginal cytology in 56 adenocarcinomas and 25 adenosquamous carcinomas (42 cervical, 36 endometrial, 2 metastatic and 1 arising synchronously from both cervix and endometrium) were reviewed, including review of the actual slides in 56 cases. Overall, 80% of the initial cytologic diagnoses resulted in diagnostic curettage (i.e., cytology was effectively positive); 84% of the postreview diagnosis were effectively positive. Nine cytology slides showed no malignant cells; eight of these negative smears showed repair, five were atrophic, two showed a high estrogen effect and one had enlarged atypical bare nuclei. These false-negative diagnoses were associated with an endometrial primary site (P less than .01), endometrioid histology (P less than .005), low-grade or intermediate-grade histology (P less than .005), small size of tumor (P less than .05) and absence of cervical involvement (P less than .005) in those cases in which a hysterectomy was performed. False-negative diagnoses were not associated with an absence of endocervical cells or with scanty cellularity. Of 39 cervical and 28 endometrial carcinomas with a positive cytologic diagnosis (initially or after review of the available slides), cytology correctly identified the primary site in 18% and 54% of the cases, respectively. Cytology incorrectly classified the anatomic site of four cervical and three endometrial carcinomas and considered one case arising in both the endometrium and cervix to be endometrial. Routine cervicovaginal cytology does have a role in screening for uterine glandular carcinoma; to maximize its diagnostic sensitivity, we suggest using a recommendation for curettage in the report of positive cases so that all of the varied cytologic diagnoses associated with glandular carcinomas will receive a uniform clinical response. In those cases with preserved cancer cells, a correlation can be made with the histologic type of the carcinoma, rather than with the anatomic site.
为了研究诊断准确性并描述假阴性病例的特征,我们回顾了56例腺癌和25例腺鳞癌(42例宫颈癌、36例子宫内膜癌、2例转移癌和1例同时起源于宫颈和子宫内膜)的宫颈阴道细胞学检查结果,其中56例复查了实际玻片。总体而言,80%的初始细胞学诊断导致诊断性刮宫(即细胞学检查结果为有效阳性);复查后的诊断中84%为有效阳性。9张细胞学玻片未发现恶性细胞;其中8张阴性涂片显示修复,5张为萎缩性,2张显示高雌激素效应,1张有增大的非典型裸核。这些假阴性诊断与子宫内膜原发部位(P<0.01)、子宫内膜样组织学类型(P<0.005)、低级别或中级别组织学类型(P<0.005)、肿瘤体积小(P<0.05)以及行子宫切除术的病例中无宫颈受累情况(P<0.005)相关。假阴性诊断与宫颈管内细胞缺失或细胞量少无关。在39例宫颈癌和28例子宫内膜癌中,细胞学检查初始诊断或复查玻片后诊断为阳性,其中细胞学检查分别在18%和54%的病例中正确识别了原发部位。细胞学检查错误分类了4例宫颈癌和3例子宫内膜癌的解剖部位,并将1例同时起源于子宫内膜和宫颈的病例误诊为子宫内膜癌。常规宫颈阴道细胞学检查在子宫腺癌筛查中确实有作用;为了最大限度提高其诊断敏感性,我们建议在阳性病例报告中使用刮宫建议,以便与腺癌相关的所有不同细胞学诊断都能得到统一的临床反应。在那些有癌细胞留存的病例中,可以将其与癌的组织学类型相关联,而不是与解剖部位相关联。