Hartman B, Kaplan B, Boone D
Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Dec;68(6):832-6.
Conization specimens with a histologic diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III were reviewed with respect to cytology findings in the three months preceding conization. In 29% of the cases, one or more false-negative cytology reports preceded conization. No dysplastic cells were found on review of the false-negative cytology slides from these cases. Morphometric analysis of surface dysplasia in the conization specimens was performed to explain these findings. A statistically significantly greater surface area of dysplasia and greater spread of dysplastic cells in the endocervical canal was found in the positive cytology when compared to the false-negative cytology cases. No difference in vaginal spread of dysplasia existed between the two groups. The endocervical canal was sampled with a moist cotton swab in all of the cases. The results suggest that small numbers of dysplastic cells high in the endocervical canal may not be effectively sampled by cotton swabs in cases of false-negative cervical cytology, lowering screening sensitivity.
对组织学诊断为宫颈上皮内瘤变III级的锥切标本,回顾了锥切前三个月的细胞学检查结果。在29%的病例中,锥切前有一份或多份细胞学报告为假阴性。复查这些病例的假阴性细胞学玻片时未发现发育异常细胞。对锥切标本中的表面发育异常进行形态计量分析以解释这些发现。与假阴性细胞学病例相比,阳性细胞学病例中发育异常的表面积在统计学上显著更大,且宫颈管内发育异常细胞的扩散范围更广。两组间发育异常的阴道扩散情况无差异。所有病例均用湿棉签对宫颈管进行取材。结果表明,在宫颈细胞学检查假阴性的病例中,宫颈管高处少量发育异常细胞可能无法被棉签有效取材,从而降低了筛查敏感性。