• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在门诊环境下进行异基因和自体造血干细胞移植:对感染并发症和早期移植结果的影响。

Performing allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic SCT in the outpatient setting: effects on infectious complications and early transplant outcomes.

机构信息

The University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010 Jul;45(7):1220-6. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2009.330. Epub 2009 Nov 30.

DOI:10.1038/bmt.2009.330
PMID:19946343
Abstract

This retrospective single-center study compared the incidence, spectrum and effect of infections in 1045 consecutive allogeneic (allo) and autologous (auto) hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) performed between 1995 and 2006 in the inpatient (IP) or outpatient (OP) setting. We analyzed 374 allo-HSCT (196 IP and 178 OP) and 671 auto-HSCT (163 IP and 508 OP). The incidence of infection was lower both in auto-OP (25% OP vs 33% IP, P=0.042) and allo-OP cohorts (42.7% OP vs 55.6% IP, P=0.012). The mean number of infections per transplant was lower in both auto-OP (0.39 OP vs 0.57 IP, P=0.05) and in allo-OP cohorts (0.78 OP vs 1.09 IP, P=0.018). The 100-day non-relapse mortality (NRM) for OP auto-HSCT was 4.72% and for IP 3.95% (P=0.68). The 100-day NRM for OP allo-HSCT was lower at 14.1% than it was for IP at 22.6% (P=0.041). Time to onset of first infection and spectrum of infections was similar in all groups. We conclude that performing allo- and auto-HSCT in the OP setting results in short-term outcomes, including infections complications that are comparable to the standard IP setting.

摘要

这项回顾性单中心研究比较了 1995 年至 2006 年期间在住院(IP)或门诊(OP)环境中连续进行的 1045 例同种异体(allo)和自体(auto)造血干细胞移植(HSCT)中感染的发生率、谱和影响。我们分析了 374 例 allo-HSCT(196 例 IP 和 178 例 OP)和 671 例 auto-HSCT(163 例 IP 和 508 例 OP)。感染发生率在 auto-OP(25% OP 与 33% IP,P=0.042)和 allo-OP 队列中均较低(42.7% OP 与 55.6% IP,P=0.012)。在这两个队列中,auto-OP(0.39 OP 与 0.57 IP,P=0.05)和 allo-OP(0.78 OP 与 1.09 IP,P=0.018)中每例移植的感染次数均较低。OP auto-HSCT 的 100 天非复发死亡率(NRM)为 4.72%,而 IP 为 3.95%(P=0.68)。OP allo-HSCT 的 100 天 NRM 为 14.1%,低于 IP 的 22.6%(P=0.041)。所有组中首次感染的发病时间和感染谱相似。我们得出结论,在 OP 环境中进行 allo 和 auto-HSCT 可获得短期结果,包括感染并发症,与标准的 IP 环境相当。

相似文献

1
Performing allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic SCT in the outpatient setting: effects on infectious complications and early transplant outcomes.在门诊环境下进行异基因和自体造血干细胞移植:对感染并发症和早期移植结果的影响。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010 Jul;45(7):1220-6. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2009.330. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
2
[Comparison of autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for 140 patients with de novo acute leukemia in first complete remission].140例初治急性白血病首次完全缓解患者自体与异基因造血干细胞移植的比较
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2004 Jul;25(7):389-92.
3
Outpatient reduced-intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation for patients with refractory or relapsed lymphomas compared with autologous stem cell transplantation using a simplified method.采用简化方法的难治性或复发性淋巴瘤患者门诊接受低强度异基因干细胞移植与自体干细胞移植的比较。
Ann Hematol. 2010 Oct;89(10):1045-52. doi: 10.1007/s00277-010-0986-1. Epub 2010 May 21.
4
Early infections in adults undergoing matched related and matched unrelated/mismatched donor stem cell transplantation: a comparison of incidence.接受匹配相关及匹配无关/不匹配供体干细胞移植的成人早期感染:发病率比较
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002 Sep;30(5):303-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703643.
5
Long-term outcome after allo-SCT: close follow-up on a large cohort treated with myeloablative regimens.异基因造血干细胞移植后的长期结果:接受清髓性方案治疗的大队列的密切随访。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010 Feb;45(2):295-302. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2009.128. Epub 2009 Jul 13.
6
Efficacy of allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic SCT in patients with AML after first complete remission.异体和自体造血干细胞移植在首次完全缓解后 AML 患者中的疗效。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013 Mar;48(3):383-9. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2012.154. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
7
Comparison of two pretransplant predictive models and a flexible HCT-CI using different cut off points to determine low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups: the flexible HCT-CI Is the best predictor of NRM and OS in a population of patients undergoing allo-RIC.比较两种移植前预测模型和使用不同截断点的灵活 HCT-CI,以确定低、中、高危组:在接受 allo-RIC 的患者人群中,灵活 HCT-CI 是 NRM 和 OS 的最佳预测因子。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010 Mar;16(3):413-20. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.11.008. Epub 2009 Nov 14.
8
Autologous and allogeneic transplantation for multiple myeloma at a single centre.单一中心进行的多发性骨髓瘤自体和异体移植
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1997 Apr;19(8):783-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1700738.
9
[Autologous versus allogeneic stem cell transplantation in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia].[成年急性淋巴细胞白血病患者的自体与异基因干细胞移植]
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2006 Aug;28(4):544-8.
10
Extramedullary vs medullary relapse after autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) and its correlation to clinical outcome.多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者自体或异基因造血干细胞移植(HSCT)后髓外复发与髓内复发情况及其与临床结局的相关性
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2004 Dec;34(12):1057-65. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704713.

引用本文的文献

1
Better clinical outcomes and lower triggering of inflammatory cytokines for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients treated in home care versus hospital isolation - the Karolinska experience.与在医院隔离相比,接受同种异体造血细胞移植的患者在家庭护理中接受治疗具有更好的临床结局和更低的炎症细胞因子触发率 - 卡罗林斯卡经验。
Front Immunol. 2024 Aug 7;15:1384137. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1384137. eCollection 2024.
2
Ambulatory models for autologous stem-cell transplantation: a systematic review of the health impact.门诊自体干细胞移植模型:对健康影响的系统评价。
Front Immunol. 2024 Jul 16;15:1419186. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1419186. eCollection 2024.
3
Brave new world: expanding home care in stem cell transplantation and advanced therapies with new technologies.
勇敢新世界:新技术拓展干细胞移植和先进疗法的家庭护理。
Front Immunol. 2024 Apr 26;15:1366962. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1366962. eCollection 2024.
4
Literature review and expert opinion on the treatment of high-risk acute myeloid leukemia in patients who are eligible for intensive chemotherapy.关于适合强化化疗的高危急性髓系白血病患者治疗的文献综述与专家意见
Front Oncol. 2024 Feb 20;14:1367393. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1367393. eCollection 2024.
5
Health care costs among patients with hematologic malignancies receiving allogeneic transplants: a US payer perspective.接受异基因移植的血液系统恶性肿瘤患者的医疗保健费用:美国支付者视角。
Blood Adv. 2024 Mar 12;8(5):1200-1208. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023011033.
6
Outpatient allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: a review.门诊异基因造血干细胞移植:综述
Ther Adv Hematol. 2022 Feb 26;13:20406207221080739. doi: 10.1177/20406207221080739. eCollection 2022.
7
Hospital and outpatient models for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A systematic review of comparative studies for health outcomes, experience of care and costs.造血干细胞移植的医院和门诊模式:对健康结果、护理体验和成本的比较研究的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 12;16(8):e0254135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254135. eCollection 2021.
8
Utilisation and outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in Ontario, Canada, and New York State, USA: a population-based retrospective cohort study.加拿大安大略省和美国纽约州异体造血细胞移植的应用和结果:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 31;10(10):e039293. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039293.
9
Exploring the caregiver's experience in an innovative homebound hematopoietic stem cell transplantation program.探索创新的居家造血干细胞移植项目中护理人员的体验。
Palliat Support Care. 2021 Aug;19(4):397-404. doi: 10.1017/S1478951520000954.
10
Caregiver availability and patient access to hematopoietic cell transplantation: social worker perspectives inform practice.照顾者的可用性和患者接受造血细胞移植的机会:社会工作者的观点为实践提供信息。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Nov;27(11):4253-4264. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04696-2. Epub 2019 Mar 9.