• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于放置橡皮障夹以进行窝沟封闭的局部麻醉:利多卡因/丙胺卡因凝胶与苯佐卡因的比较

Topical anesthesia for rubber dam clamp placement in sealant placement: comparison of lidocaine/prilocaine gel and benzocaine.

作者信息

Yoon Richard K, Chussid Steven

机构信息

Division of Pediatric Dentistry, Columbia University College of Dental Medicine, New York City, NY, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Dent. 2009 Sep-Oct;31(5):377-81.

PMID:19947131
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this prospective study was to compare the efficacy of Oraqix to benzocaine while placing a rubber dam clamp during sealant placement on children.

METHODS

A sample size of 45 7- to 12-year-old patients who presented for bilateral sealants on permanent first molars participated in this study. A split-mouth design was implemented with Oraqix applied to one side and 20 percent benzocaine gel applied to the other. After placing the topical anesthetic and the rubber dam clamp, patients completed a Feces Pain Scale (FPS) to rate the level of discomfort after clamp placement.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven subjects (60%) were female and 18 subjects (40%) were mole; 15 (33%) were younger than 9 years old and 30 (67%) were at least 9 years old. The overall difference in mean FPS ratings was not statistically significant (P = .27). Regarding gender, there was no statistically significant difference in males (P = .65) or females (P = .26). There was also no difference in mean FPS ratings when looking at age groups younger than 9 years old with P=.77 In the 9 years and older age groups, however there was a statistically significant difference, with P = .04.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of Oraqix did not reduce discomfort when compared to benzocaine in this small sample size. Oraqix was more effective than benzocaine in the age group 9 and older. A larger sample size is needed to determine its efficacy in children younger than 9years old.

摘要

目的

这项前瞻性研究的目的是比较在儿童放置窝沟封闭剂时使用奥克赛(Oraqix)和苯佐卡因放置橡皮障夹的效果。

方法

45名7至12岁前来为恒第一磨牙进行双侧窝沟封闭的患者参与了本研究。采用双侧对照设计,一侧使用奥克赛,另一侧使用20%苯佐卡因凝胶。在涂抹局部麻醉剂和放置橡皮障夹后,患者完成面部疼痛量表(FPS)以评估放置夹子后的不适程度。

结果

27名受试者(60%)为女性,18名受试者(40%)为男性;15名(33%)年龄小于9岁,30名(67%)至少9岁。平均FPS评分的总体差异无统计学意义(P = 0.27)。在性别方面,男性(P = 0.65)或女性(P = 0.26)均无统计学显著差异。在年龄小于9岁的组中,平均FPS评分也无差异(P = 0.77)。然而,在9岁及以上年龄组中,存在统计学显著差异,P = 0.04。

结论

在这个小样本中,与苯佐卡因相比,使用奥克赛并未减轻不适。在9岁及以上年龄组中,奥克赛比苯佐卡因更有效。需要更大样本量来确定其在9岁以下儿童中的疗效。

相似文献

1
Topical anesthesia for rubber dam clamp placement in sealant placement: comparison of lidocaine/prilocaine gel and benzocaine.用于放置橡皮障夹以进行窝沟封闭的局部麻醉:利多卡因/丙胺卡因凝胶与苯佐卡因的比较
Pediatr Dent. 2009 Sep-Oct;31(5):377-81.
2
Evaluating the efficacy of EMLA topical anesthetic in sealant placement with rubber dam.评估复方利多卡因乳膏局部麻醉剂在使用橡皮障放置窝沟封闭剂中的疗效。
Pediatr Dent. 2004 Nov-Dec;26(6):497-500.
3
Comparison of topical anesthetics (EMLA/Oraqix vs. benzocaine) on pain experienced during palatal needle injection.局部麻醉剂(复方利多卡因乳膏/奥布卡因凝胶与苯佐卡因)用于腭部注射针注射时疼痛的比较。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 May;103(5):e16-20. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.11.033. Epub 2007 Feb 27.
4
Reduction of pain from needle stick in the oral mucosa by topical anesthetics: a comparative study between lidocaine/prilocaine and benzocaine.局部麻醉剂减轻口腔黏膜针刺疼痛的研究:利多卡因/丙胺卡因与苯佐卡因的对比研究
J Clin Dent. 2005;16(2):53-6.
5
Reducing children's injection pain: lidocaine patches versus topical benzocaine gel.减轻儿童注射疼痛:利多卡因贴片与外用苯佐卡因凝胶的比较。
Pediatr Dent. 2001 Jan-Feb;23(1):19-23.
6
A Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating Rubber Dam Clamp Pain Reduction from a New Topical Liposomal Anesthetic Gel.一项评估新型局部脂质体麻醉凝胶减轻橡皮障夹疼痛效果的随机临床试验。
Pediatr Dent. 2018 May 15;40(3):190-194.
7
Should a mucoadhesive patch (DentiPatch) be used for gingival anesthesia in children?儿童牙龈麻醉是否应使用黏膜黏附贴片(DentiPatch)?
Anesth Prog. 2002 Winter;49(1):3-8.
8
Children's preference of benzocaine gel versus the lidocaine patch.儿童对苯佐卡因凝胶与利多卡因贴片的偏好。
Pediatr Dent. 2003 Jul-Aug;25(4):401-5.
9
Evaluating the efficacy of commonly used topical anesthetics.评估常用局部麻醉剂的疗效。
Pediatr Dent. 1999 May-Jun;21(3):197-200.
10
Comparison of topical EMLA 5% oral adhesive to benzocaine 20% on the pain experienced during palatal anesthetic infiltration in children.儿童腭部麻醉浸润时,局部应用5%复方利多卡因口腔粘贴剂与20%苯佐卡因在疼痛体验方面的比较。
Pediatr Dent. 2001 Jan-Feb;23(1):11-4.

引用本文的文献

1
The effect of rubber dam on objective and subjective parameters of stress during dental treatment in children: a randomized clinical trial.橡皮障对儿童牙科治疗期间应激客观和主观参数的影响:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 30;25(1):855. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06250-5.
2
Evaluation of the forces applied by rubber dam clamps on mandibular first molar teeth with different endodontic access cavities: a 3D FEA study.评价不同根管治疗入口洞型的下颌第一磨牙橡皮障夹所施加的力:三维有限元分析研究。
PeerJ. 2024 Aug 26;12:e17921. doi: 10.7717/peerj.17921. eCollection 2024.
3
Beyond Tradition: Non-surgical Endodontics and Vital Pulp Therapy as a Dynamic Combination.
超越传统:非手术牙髓治疗与活髓治疗的动态结合
Cureus. 2023 Aug 25;15(8):e44134. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44134. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Topical Anesthesia in Pediatric Dentistry: An Update.儿童牙科局部麻醉:最新进展
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Mar-Apr;15(2):240-245. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2355.
5
Reducing pain and discomfort associated with rubber dam clamp placement in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness.减轻儿童和青少年橡皮障夹放置相关疼痛和不适的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jun 16;23(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03115-7.
6
Evaluation of pain response in children to the SoftClamp™ as an alternative to the metal rubber dam clamp: A randomized clinical trial.评估儿童对SoftClamp™作为金属橡皮障夹替代品的疼痛反应:一项随机临床试验。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023 Feb 14;20:21. doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.369623. eCollection 2023.
7
Distraction With Virtual Reality Goggles in Paediatric Dental Treatment: A Randomised Controlled Trial.虚拟现实眼镜在儿科牙科治疗中的分散注意力作用:一项随机对照试验。
Int Dent J. 2023 Feb;73(1):108-113. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.06.003. Epub 2022 Aug 6.
8
Topical anesthesia for stainless steel crown tooth preparation in primary molars: a pilot study.乳牙不锈钢冠牙体预备的局部麻醉:一项初步研究。
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2020 Aug;20(4):241-250. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2020.20.4.241. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
9
Efficacy and Safety of a Lidocaine Gel in Patients from 6 Months up to 8 Years with Acute Painful Sites in the Oral Cavity: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Comparative Study.
Int J Pediatr. 2015;2015:141767. doi: 10.1155/2015/141767. Epub 2015 Nov 29.
10
Evaluation of the anaesthetic properties and tolerance of 1:100,000 articaine versus 1:100,000 lidocaine. A comparative study in surgery of the lower third molar.评价 1:100000 阿替卡因与 1:100000 利多卡因的麻醉性能和耐受性。下颌第三磨牙手术的比较研究。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 Mar 1;17(2):e345-51. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17414.