Division of Cardiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA.
Pharmacotherapy. 2009 Dec;29(12):1417-26. doi: 10.1592/phco.29.12.1417.
To assess patterns and predictors of discontinuation of rhythm-control drug therapy in managed care patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation and the direct medical costs of atrial fibrillation in these patients.
Retrospective cohort study.
PharMetrics Patient-Centric Database.
A total of 3549 adults with a new diagnosis of atrial fibrillation between April 1, 2002, and March 31, 2006, and who had at least one claim for rhythm-control drug therapy within 6 months of the initial diagnosis.
Discontinuation (defined as a gap in rhythm-control drug therapy coverage [days' supply] > or = 30 days) was assessed after the initiation of rhythm-control therapy. Among the 3549 patients included in the analysis, 2688 (75.7%) discontinued initial rhythm-control therapy in the first 12 months, with a median time to discontinuation of 89 days. Significant predictors of rhythm-control therapy discontinuation included cardiac arrest (odds ratio [OR] 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04-4.83), history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.02-4.05), valvular heart disease (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.33-2.09), ischemic heart disease (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.13-1.82), and severity of illness (Charlson Comorbidity Index score; OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.17). Over 12 months, 661 (18.6%) of the 3549 patients had a hospital stay and 285 (8.0%) had an emergency department visit that were related to atrial fibrillation. Total annual atrial fibrillation-related costs/patient were $6165: $3872 for inpatient costs, $1503 for outpatient costs, and $790 for pharmacy costs.
Initial rhythm-control drug therapy is associated with a high rate of discontinuation, especially early in therapy. Such rates of discontinuation will likely have an impact on the effectiveness of disease management and the quality of care in patients with atrial fibrillation.
评估新诊断心房颤动的管理式医疗患者中节律控制药物治疗的停药模式和预测因素,以及这些患者的心房颤动直接医疗费用。
回顾性队列研究。
PharMetrics 患者中心数据库。
2002 年 4 月 1 日至 2006 年 3 月 31 日期间,共有 3549 名新诊断为心房颤动的成年人,且在初始诊断后 6 个月内至少有一次节律控制药物治疗的索赔。
在开始节律控制治疗后评估停药(定义为节律控制药物治疗覆盖[天供应量] >或= 30 天的差距)。在纳入分析的 3549 例患者中,2688 例(75.7%)在 12 个月内停止初始节律控制治疗,中位停药时间为 89 天。节律控制治疗停药的显著预测因素包括心搏骤停(比值比[OR] 2.24,95%置信区间[CI] 1.04-4.83)、冠状动脉旁路移植术史(OR 2.03,95% CI 1.02-4.05)、瓣膜性心脏病(OR 1.67,95% CI 1.33-2.09)、缺血性心脏病(OR 1.44,95% CI 1.13-1.82)和疾病严重程度(Charlson 合并症指数评分;OR 1.09,95% CI 1.01-1.17)。在 12 个月内,3549 例患者中有 661 例(18.6%)有住院治疗,285 例(8.0%)有与心房颤动相关的急诊就诊。每年与心房颤动相关的总费用/患者为 6165 美元:住院费用 3872 美元,门诊费用 1503 美元,药房费用 790 美元。
初始节律控制药物治疗的停药率很高,尤其是在治疗早期。这种停药率可能会对心房颤动患者的疾病管理效果和护理质量产生影响。