Department of Clinical Sciences, Institute of Tropical Medicine (ITM), Nationalestraat 155, B 2000 Antwerp, Belgium.
Malar J. 2009 Nov 30;8:271. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-8-271.
BACKGROUND: The prozone effect (or high doses-hook phenomenon) consists of false-negative or false-low results in immunological tests, due to an excess of either antigens or antibodies. Although frequently cited as a cause of false-negative results in malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs), especially at high parasite densities of Plasmodium falciparum, it has been poorly documented. In this study, a panel of malaria RDTs was challenged with clinical samples with P. falciparum hyperparasitaemia (> 5% infected red blood cells). METHODS: Twenty-two RDT brands were tested with seven samples, both undiluted and upon 10 x, 50 x and 100 x dilutions in NaCl 0.9%. The P. falciparum targets included histidine-rich protein-2 (HRP-2, n = 17) and P. falciparum-specific parasite lactate dehydrogenase (Pf-pLDH, n = 5). Test lines intensities were recorded in the following categories: negative, faint, weak, medium or strong. The prozone effect was defined as an increase in test line intensity of at least one category after dilution, if observed upon duplicate testing and by two readers. RESULTS: Sixteen of the 17 HRP-2 based RDTs were affected by prozone: the prozone effect was observed in at least one RDT sample/brand combination for 16/17 HRP-2 based RDTs in 6/7 samples, but not for any of the Pf-pLDH tests. The HRP-2 line intensities of the undiluted sample/brand combinations with prozone effect (n = 51) included a single negative (1.9%) and 29 faint and weak readings (56.9%). The other target lens (P. vivax-pLDH, pan-specific pLDH and aldolase) did not show a prozone effect. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the prozone effect as a cause of false-negative HRP-2 RDTs in samples with hyperparasitaemia.
背景:前带效应(或高剂量钩状效应)是指由于抗原或抗体过量,导致免疫检测出现假阴性或低值结果。尽管前带效应常被认为是导致疟疾快速诊断检测(RDT)出现假阴性结果的原因之一,尤其是在恶性疟原虫密度较高时,但对其的记录却很少。在这项研究中,一组疟疾 RDT 对恶性疟原虫高寄生血症(> 5%受感染的红细胞)的临床样本进行了检测。
方法:用七种未经稀释和分别用 10x、50x 和 100x 稀释的 NaCl 0.9%稀释的临床样本,对 22 个 RDT 品牌进行了测试。RDT 检测的疟原虫靶标包括富含组氨酸蛋白-2(HRP-2,n = 17)和疟原虫特异性乳酸脱氢酶(Pf-pLDH,n = 5)。在以下类别中记录了测试线的强度:阴性、微弱、弱、中或强。如果在重复检测和两位读者的观察中发现,稀释后测试线强度至少增加一个类别,则定义为前带效应。
结果:17 个基于 HRP-2 的 RDT 中有 16 个受到前带效应的影响:在 6/7 个样本中,至少有一个 RDT 样本/品牌组合观察到 16/17 个基于 HRP-2 的 RDT 存在前带效应,但任何 Pf-pLDH 检测都没有。具有前带效应的未稀释样本/品牌组合的 HRP-2 线强度包括 1 个阴性(1.9%)和 29 个微弱和弱的读数(56.9%)。另一个靶标(间日疟原虫-pLDH、泛特异性 pLDH 和醛缩酶)没有出现前带效应。
结论:本研究证实了前带效应是导致高寄生血症样本中 HRP-2 RDT 出现假阴性的原因。
Malar J. 2009-11-30
Malar J. 2011-6-15
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025-5-21
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024-12-5
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2009-4
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008-11
Travel Med Infect Dis. 2008
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2008-1