Fernandez Charles E, Amiri Abid, Jaime Joseph, Delaney Paul
Associate Clinical Professor, Los Angeles College of Chiropractic, Southern California University of Health Sciences (LACC/SCUHS), Whittier, CA.
J Chiropr Med. 2009 Dec;8(4):171-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2009.07.006.
The purpose of this article is to offer a narrative review and discuss the possible relationship between temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) and whiplash injuries.
Databases from 1966 to present were searched including PubMed; Manual, Alternative, and Natural Therapy Index System; and Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature. Search terms used included whiplash injury, temporomandibular disorders and craniomandibular disorders. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies on orofacial pain of a musculoskeletal origin addressing the following topics: posttraumatic temporomandibular disorder (pTMD) incidence and prevalence, mechanism of injury, clinical findings and characteristics, prognosis (including psychologic factors). Excluded were studies of orofacial pain from nontraumatic origin, as well as nonmusculoskeletal causes including neurologic, vascular, neoplastic, or infectious disease.
Thirty-two studies describing the effects of whiplash on TMD were reviewed based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. The best evidence from prospective studies indicates a low to moderate incidence and prevalence. Only 3 studies addressed mechanism of injury theories. Most studies focusing on clinical findings and characteristics suggest significant differences when comparing pTMD to idiopathic/nontraumatic patients. Regarding prognosis, most studies suggest a significant difference when comparing pTMD to idiopathic/nontraumatic TMD patients, with pTMD having a poorer prognosis.
There is conflicting evidence regarding the effects of whiplash on the development of TMD. Furthermore, because of lack of homogeneity in the study populations and lack of standardization of data collection procedures and outcomes measured, this review cannot conclusively resolve the controversies that exist concerning this relationship. This review of the literature is provided to clarify the issues and to provide useful clinical information for health care providers managing TMD such as doctors of chiropractic, physical therapists, dentists, and medical doctors.
本文旨在进行叙述性综述,并探讨颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)与挥鞭样损伤之间可能存在的关系。
检索了1966年至今的数据库,包括PubMed、手动、替代和自然疗法索引系统以及护理与联合健康文献累积索引。使用的检索词包括挥鞭样损伤、颞下颌关节紊乱病和颅下颌疾病。纳入标准包括关于肌肉骨骼源性口面部疼痛的研究,涉及以下主题:创伤后颞下颌关节紊乱病(pTMD)的发病率和患病率、损伤机制、临床发现和特征、预后(包括心理因素)。排除非创伤性起源的口面部疼痛研究,以及包括神经、血管、肿瘤或感染性疾病在内的非肌肉骨骼原因引起的研究。
根据纳入/排除标准,对32项描述挥鞭样损伤对TMD影响的研究进行了综述。前瞻性研究的最佳证据表明发病率和患病率较低至中等。只有3项研究涉及损伤机制理论。大多数关注临床发现和特征的研究表明,与特发性/非创伤性患者相比,pTMD存在显著差异。关于预后,大多数研究表明,与特发性/非创伤性TMD患者相比,pTMD存在显著差异,pTMD的预后较差。
关于挥鞭样损伤对TMD发展的影响,证据存在冲突。此外,由于研究人群缺乏同质性,数据收集程序和测量结果缺乏标准化,本综述无法最终解决关于这种关系存在的争议。提供本综述是为了阐明问题,并为管理TMD的医疗保健提供者(如整脊医生、物理治疗师、牙医和医生)提供有用的临床信息。