Centre for Forensic Science, University of Technology, Broadway, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2009 Dec;4(1):26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 May 1.
The successful recovery of trace or contact DNA is highly variable. It is seemingly dependent on a wide range of factors, from the characteristics of the donor, substrate and environment, to the delay between contact and recovery. There is limited research on the extent of the effect these factors have on trace DNA analysis. This study investigated the persistence of trace DNA on surfaces relevant to the investigation of burglary and robbery offences. The study aimed to limit the number of variables involved to solely determine the effect of time on DNA recovery. Given that it is difficult to control the quantity of DNA deposited during a hand contact, human buffy coat and DNA control solution were chosen as an alternative to give a more accurate measure of quantity. Set volumes of these solutions were deposited onto outdoor surfaces (window frames and vinyl material to mimic burglary and 'bag snatch' offences) and sterile glass slides stored in a closed environment in the laboratory, for use as a control. Trace DNA casework data was also scrutinised to assess the effect of time on DNA recovery from real samples. The amount of DNA recovered from buffy coat on the outdoor surfaces declined by approximately half over two weeks, to a negligible amount after six weeks. Profiles could not be obtained after two weeks. The samples stored in the laboratory were more robust, and full profiles were obtained after six weeks, the longest time period tested in these experiments. It is possible that profiles may be obtained from older samples when kept in similarly favourable conditions. The experimental results demonstrate that the ability to recover DNA from human cells on outdoor surfaces decreases significantly over two weeks. Conversely, no clear trends were identified in the casework data, indicating that many other factors are involved affecting the recovery of trace DNA. Nevertheless, to ensure that valuable trace evidence is not lost, it is recommended that crime scenes are processed expeditiously.
痕量或接触 DNA 的成功回收具有高度可变性。它似乎依赖于广泛的因素,从供体、基质和环境的特征,到接触和恢复之间的时间延迟。关于这些因素对痕量 DNA 分析的影响程度的研究有限。本研究调查了与盗窃和抢劫犯罪调查相关的表面上痕量 DNA 的持久性。该研究旨在将涉及的变量数量限制到仅确定时间对 DNA 回收的影响。由于难以控制在接触过程中沉积的 DNA 量,因此选择人类血斑和 DNA 对照溶液作为替代物,以更准确地测量量。将这些溶液的设定体积沉积在户外表面(窗框和乙烯基材料,以模拟盗窃和“抢包”犯罪)和实验室中封闭环境下储存的无菌载玻片上,用作对照。还仔细审查了痕量 DNA 案例数据,以评估时间对从真实样本中回收 DNA 的影响。在两周内,户外表面上的血斑中回收的 DNA 量减少了约一半,六周后几乎可以忽略不计。两周后无法获得图谱。存放在实验室中的样本更稳定,在这些实验中最长的测试时间六周后获得了完整的图谱。在类似有利条件下保存时,从较旧的样本中可能获得图谱。实验结果表明,从户外表面上的人类细胞中回收 DNA 的能力在两周内显著下降。相反,案例数据中没有明显的趋势,表明还有许多其他因素参与影响痕量 DNA 的回收。尽管如此,为了确保不会丢失有价值的痕量证据,建议迅速处理犯罪现场。