Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Eur J Med Res. 2009 Nov 3;14(11):502-6. doi: 10.1186/2047-783x-14-11-502.
The analysis of cost effectiveness in hospitals is as difficult as treating the patients properly. We are yet not able to answer the simple question of what costs are caused by a certain diagnosis and its treatment during an average hospital stay.
To answer some issues of the global problem of cost effectiveness during hospitalisation, we analysed the costs and the cost structure of a normal obstetrical hospital stay during an uncomplicated vaginal delivery and a planned caesarean section. Cost data was collected and summarized from the patients file, the hospital's computer system gathering all cost centres, known material expenses and expenses of non obstetrical medical services.
For vaginal deliveries/planned caesareans we can calculate with a surplus of about 83Euro/1432Euro. About 45% of the summarized costs are calculated on a reliable database.
The introduction of the DRG based clearing system in Germany has aggravated the discussion on cost effectiveness. Our meticulous work-up of expenses excluded personal precautionary costs and personnel costs of documentation because no tools are described to depict such costs. If we would add these costs to the known expenses of our study, we strongly suspect that hospital treatment of vaginal deliveries or planned caesarean sections is not cost effective.
医院的成本效益分析和正确治疗患者一样困难。我们仍然无法回答一个简单的问题,即在平均住院期间,特定诊断及其治疗会产生哪些费用。
为了解决住院期间成本效益的全球性问题,我们分析了正常产科分娩和计划剖宫产期间无并发症的阴道分娩的住院费用和费用结构。从患者档案、医院计算机系统收集所有成本中心、已知材料费用和非产科医疗服务费用中收集和总结了成本数据。
对于阴道分娩/计划剖宫产,我们可以计算出约 83 欧元/1432 欧元的盈余。总结的费用约有 45%是基于可靠的数据库计算的。
德国引入基于 DRG 的清算系统加剧了对成本效益的讨论。我们对费用的细致梳理排除了个人预防费用和文件编制人员成本,因为没有工具可以描述这些成本。如果我们将这些成本添加到我们研究中已知的费用中,我们强烈怀疑阴道分娩或计划剖宫产的医院治疗没有成本效益。