• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应对意外婴儿死亡:一个英国地区的经验。

Responding to unexpected infant deaths: experience in one English region.

机构信息

Health Sciences Research Institute, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child. 2010 Apr;95(4):291-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.167619. Epub 2009 Nov 29.

DOI:10.1136/adc.2009.167619
PMID:19948508
Abstract

AIM

New national procedures for responding to the unexpected death of a child in England require a joint agency approach to investigate each death and support the bereaved family. As part of a wider population-based study of sudden unexpected deaths in infancy (SUDI) we evaluated the implementation of this approach.

METHODS

A process evaluation was carried out using a population-based study of all unexpected deaths from birth to 2 years in the South West of England between January 2003 and December 2006. Local police and health professionals followed a standardised approach to the investigation of each death, supported by the research team set up to facilitate this joint approach as well as collect data for a wider research project.

RESULTS

We were notified of 155/157 SUDI, with a median time to notification of 2 h. Initial multi-agency discussions took place in 93.5% of cases. A joint home visit by police officers with health professionals was carried out in 117 cases, 75% within 24 h of the death. Time to notification and interview reduced during the 4 years of the study. Autopsies were conducted on all cases, the median time to autopsy being 3 days. At the conclusion of the investigation, a local multi-agency case discussion was held in 88% of cases. The median time for the whole process (including family support) was 5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This study has demonstrated that with appropriate protocols and support, the joint agency approach to the investigation of unexpected infant deaths can be successfully implemented.

摘要

目的

英国针对儿童意外死亡的新国家程序要求联合机构采取联合方法调查每起死亡事件并为死者家属提供支持。作为婴儿突发意外死亡(SUDI)更广泛的基于人群研究的一部分,我们评估了这种方法的实施情况。

方法

我们使用 2003 年 1 月至 2006 年 12 月期间英格兰西南部出生至 2 岁之间所有意外死亡的基于人群的研究,进行了一项过程评估。当地警察和卫生专业人员按照标准方法调查每起死亡事件,由专门成立的研究小组提供支持,以促进这种联合方法,并为更广泛的研究项目收集数据。

结果

我们接到了 155/157 例 SUDI 的通知,通知中位数时间为 2 小时。93.5%的病例进行了初步多机构讨论。在 117 例病例中,警察与卫生专业人员进行了联合家访,75%的病例在死亡后 24 小时内进行。在研究的 4 年中,通知和访谈的时间减少了。所有病例都进行了尸检,尸检中位数时间为 3 天。在调查结束时,88%的病例举行了当地多机构案例讨论。整个过程(包括家庭支持)的中位数时间为 5 个月。

结论

这项研究表明,通过适当的协议和支持,可以成功实施联合机构方法调查意外婴儿死亡事件。

相似文献

1
Responding to unexpected infant deaths: experience in one English region.应对意外婴儿死亡:一个英国地区的经验。
Arch Dis Child. 2010 Apr;95(4):291-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.167619. Epub 2009 Nov 29.
2
Contribution of bacteriology and virology in sudden unexpected death in infancy.细菌学和病毒学在婴儿猝死中的作用。
Arch Dis Child. 2010 May;95(5):371-6. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.162792.
3
Rigour and Rapport: a qualitative study of parents' and professionals' experiences of joint agency infant death investigation.严谨与融洽:关于父母和专业人员联合进行婴儿死亡调查经历的定性研究
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Feb 7;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0803-2.
4
Quality of investigations into unexpected deaths of infants and young children in England after implementation of national child death review procedures in 2008: a retrospective assessment.2008 年实施全国儿童死亡审查程序后,对英格兰婴儿和幼儿意外死亡调查质量的回顾性评估。
Arch Dis Child. 2020 Mar;105(3):270-275. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317420. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
5
Parental Perspectives家长观点
6
The role of post-mortem investigations in determining the cause of sudden unexpected death in infancy.尸检调查在确定婴儿猝死原因中的作用。
Arch Dis Child. 2008 Dec;93(12):1048-53. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.136739. Epub 2008 Jun 30.
7
Sterile site infection at autopsy in sudden unexpected deaths in infancy.婴儿猝死尸检时的无菌部位感染
Arch Dis Child. 2009 Apr;94(4):303-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.135939. Epub 2008 Sep 15.
8
A multiagency protocol for responding to sudden unexpected death in infancy: descriptive study.一项针对婴儿猝死综合征的多机构应对方案:描述性研究
BMJ. 2005 Jan 29;330(7485):227-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38323.652523.F7. Epub 2004 Dec 13.
9
Deaths of pediatric patients: relevance to their medical home, an urban primary care clinic.儿科患者的死亡:与他们的医疗之家——一家城市初级保健诊所的相关性。
Pediatrics. 2005 Jan;115(1):57-63. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0445.
10
Sudden unexpected neonatal death in the first week of life: autopsy findings from a specialist centre.出生后第一周内的突发意外新生儿死亡:一家专科中心的尸检结果
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009 May;22(5):398-404. doi: 10.1080/14767050802406677.

引用本文的文献

1
National registry for sudden unexpected deaths of infants and children in England: why do we need one and do families want one?英格兰婴幼儿突发意外死亡国家登记处:我们为何需要一个这样的登记处,且家庭是否希望有这样一个登记处?
Arch Dis Child. 2019 Oct;104(10):989-993. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316542. Epub 2019 Apr 20.
2
Rigour and Rapport: a qualitative study of parents' and professionals' experiences of joint agency infant death investigation.严谨与融洽:关于父母和专业人员联合进行婴儿死亡调查经历的定性研究
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Feb 7;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0803-2.
3
Unintentional asphyxia, SIDS, and medically explained deaths: a descriptive study of outcomes of child death review (CDR) investigations following sudden unexpected death in infancy.
意外窒息、婴儿猝死综合征及医学解释性死亡:一项关于婴儿意外猝死儿童死亡审查(CDR)调查结果的描述性研究。
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2016 Dec;12(4):407-415. doi: 10.1007/s12024-016-9802-0. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
4
Parental understanding and self-blame following sudden infant death: a mixed-methods study of bereaved parents' and professionals' experiences.婴儿猝死后父母的理解与自责:一项关于丧亲父母及专业人士经历的混合方法研究
BMJ Open. 2016 May 19;6(5):e011323. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011323.
5
An evidence-based guide to the investigation of sudden unexpected death in infancy.婴儿期意外猝死调查的循证指南。
Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2015 Sep;11(3):345-57. doi: 10.1007/s12024-015-9680-x. Epub 2015 May 22.