Suppr超能文献

严谨与融洽:关于父母和专业人员联合进行婴儿死亡调查经历的定性研究

Rigour and Rapport: a qualitative study of parents' and professionals' experiences of joint agency infant death investigation.

作者信息

Garstang Joanna, Griffiths Frances, Sidebotham Peter

机构信息

Division of Mental Health and Wellbeing, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV7 4AL, UK.

Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV7 4AL, UK.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2017 Feb 7;17(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0803-2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In many countries there are now detailed Child Death Review (CDR) processes following unexpected child deaths. CDR can lead to a fuller understanding of the causes for each child's death but this potentially intrusive process may increase the distress of bereaved families. In England, a joint agency approach (JAA) is used where police, healthcare and social services investigate sudden child deaths together and a key part of this is the joint home visit (JHV) where specialist police and paediatricians visit the home with the parents to view the scene of death. This study aimed to learn of bereaved parents' experiences of JAA investigation following Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy (SUDI).

METHODS

This was a qualitative study of joint agency investigation of SUDI by specialist police, healthcare and social services including case note analysis, parental questionnaires, and in-depth interviews with parents and professionals. Families were recruited at the conclusion of the JAA. Data were analysed using a Framework Approach.

RESULTS

21/113 eligible families and 26 professionals participated giving theoretical saturation of data. There was an inherent conflict for professionals trying to both investigate deaths thoroughly as well as support families. Bereaved parents appreciated the JAA especially for the information it provided about the cause of death but were frustrated with long delays waiting to obtain this. Many parents wanted more emotional support to be routinely provided. Most parents found the JHV helpful but a small minority of mothers found this intensely distressing. In comparison to JHVs, when police visited death scenes without paediatricians, information was missed and parents found these visits more upsetting. There were issues with uniformed non-specialist police traumatising parents by starting criminal investigations and preventing parents from accessing their home or collecting vital possessions.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall most parents feel supported by professionals during the JAA; however there is scope for improvement. Paediatricians should ensure that parents are kept updated with the progress of the investigations. Some parents require more emotional support and professionals should assist them in accessing this.

摘要

背景

在许多国家,现在针对意外儿童死亡事件都有详细的儿童死亡审查(CDR)流程。儿童死亡审查能够更全面地了解每个儿童的死因,但这个可能具有侵扰性的过程可能会增加丧亲家庭的痛苦。在英国,采用联合机构方法(JAA),由警方、医疗保健和社会服务部门共同调查儿童猝死事件,其中关键部分是联合家访(JHV),即专业警察和儿科医生与父母一起前往家中查看死亡现场。本研究旨在了解丧亲父母在婴儿意外猝死(SUDI)后对联合机构调查方法的体验。

方法

这是一项对警方、医疗保健和社会服务部门对婴儿意外猝死进行联合机构调查的定性研究,包括病例记录分析、家长问卷调查以及对家长和专业人员的深入访谈。在联合机构方法调查结束时招募家庭。使用框架分析法对数据进行分析。

结果

113个符合条件的家庭中有21个以及26名专业人员参与,数据达到理论饱和。专业人员在试图彻底调查死亡原因和支持家庭方面存在内在冲突。丧亲父母赞赏联合机构方法,特别是因为它提供了有关死因的信息,但对等待获取这些信息的长时间延迟感到沮丧。许多家长希望能常规地获得更多情感支持。大多数家长认为联合家访有帮助,但一小部分母亲觉得这极其痛苦。与联合家访相比,当警察在没有儿科医生的情况下前往死亡现场时,会遗漏信息,家长觉得这些访问更令人不安。存在穿制服的非专业警察启动刑事调查使家长受到创伤,并阻止家长进入自己家中或拿走重要财物的问题。

结论

总体而言,大多数家长在联合机构调查过程中感到得到了专业人员的支持;然而仍有改进空间。儿科医生应确保让家长了解调查进展情况。一些家长需要更多情感支持,专业人员应协助他们获得这种支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ff00/5297208/240025022134/12887_2017_803_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验