Warf Benjamin, Ondoma Solomon, Kulkarni Abhaya, Donnelly Ruth, Ampeire Miriam, Akona Joan, Kabachelor Collin R, Mulondo Ronald, Nsubuga Brian Kaaya
Department of Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital Boston, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009 Dec;4(6):564-70. doi: 10.3171/2009.7.PEDS09136.
Despite lower failure and infection rates compared with shunt placement, it has not been known whether endoscopic third ventriculostomy/choroid plexus cauterization (ETV/CPC) might be inferior in regard to neurocognitive development. This study is the first to describe neurocognitive outcome and ventricle volume in infants with hydrocephalus due to myelomeningocele that was treated primarily by ETV/CPC.
The modified Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID-III) test was administered to 93 children with spina bifida who were 5-52 months of age. Fifty-five of these children had been treated by ETV/CPC, 19 received ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts, and 19 had required no treatment for hydrocephalus. Raw scores were converted to scaled scores for comparison with age-corrected norms. Ventricular volume was assessed by frontal/occipital horn ratio (FOR) calculated from late postoperative CT scans. The mean values between and among groups of patients were compared using independent samples t-test and ANOVA. The comparison of mean values to population normal means was performed using the single-sample t-test. Linear regression analyses were performed using BSID scores as the dependent variables, with treatment group and ventricular size (FOR) as the independent variables. Probability values < 0.05 were considered significant.
There was no significant difference in mean age at assessment among groups (p = 0.8). The mean scale scores for untreated patients were no different from normal (all p > 0.27) in all portions of the BSID (excluding gross motor), and were generally significantly better than those for both VP shunt-treated and ETV/CPC groups. The ETV/ CPC-treated patients had nonsignificantly better mean scores than patients treated with VP shunts in all portions of the BSID (all p > 0.06), except receptive communication, which was significantly better for the ETV/CPC group (p = 0.02). The mean FOR was similar among groups, with no significant difference between the untreated group and either the VP shunt or ETV/CPC groups. The FOR did not correlate with performance.
The ETV/CPC and VP shunt groups had similar neurocognitive outcomes. Neurocognitive outcomes for infants not requiring treatment for hydrocephalus were normal and significantly better than in those requiring treatment. The mean ventricular volume was similar among all 3 groups, and significantly larger than normal. There was no association between FOR and performance. Stable mild-to-moderate ventriculomegaly alone should not trigger intervention in asymptomatic infants with spina bifida.
尽管与分流置管相比,内镜下第三脑室造瘘术/脉络丛烧灼术(ETV/CPC)的失败率和感染率更低,但在神经认知发育方面,其是否较差尚不清楚。本研究首次描述了以ETV/CPC为主要治疗方法的脊髓脊膜膨出所致脑积水婴儿的神经认知结局和脑室容积。
对93名年龄在5至52个月的脊柱裂儿童进行了改良贝利婴儿发育量表(BSID-III)测试。其中55名儿童接受了ETV/CPC治疗,19名接受了脑室腹腔(VP)分流术,19名脑积水患者无需治疗。原始分数转换为量表分数,以便与年龄校正后的常模进行比较。通过术后晚期CT扫描计算的额/枕角比(FOR)评估脑室容积。使用独立样本t检验和方差分析比较患者组间和组内的平均值。使用单样本t检验将平均值与总体正常平均值进行比较。以BSID分数为因变量,治疗组和脑室大小(FOR)为自变量进行线性回归分析。概率值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
各组间评估时的平均年龄无显著差异(p = 0.8)。未治疗患者在BSID的所有部分(不包括大运动)的平均量表分数与正常分数无差异(所有p>0.27),并且总体上显著优于VP分流术治疗组和ETV/CPC治疗组。在BSID的所有部分,ETV/CPC治疗的患者的平均分数略高于VP分流术治疗的患者(所有p>0.06),但接受性沟通方面除外,ETV/CPC组明显更好(p = 0.02)。各组间的平均FOR相似,未治疗组与VP分流术组或ETV/CPC组之间无显著差异。FOR与表现无关。
ETV/CPC组和VP分流术组的神经认知结局相似。无需治疗脑积水的婴儿的神经认知结局正常,且明显优于需要治疗的婴儿。三组的平均脑室容积相似,且明显大于正常水平。FOR与表现之间无关联。对于无症状的脊柱裂婴儿,单纯稳定的轻至中度脑室扩大不应引发干预。