Suppr超能文献

主动监测对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌传播和医院资源利用的影响。

Impact of active surveillance on meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission and hospital resource utilisation.

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, and Infection Prevention, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA.

出版信息

J Hosp Infect. 2010 Mar;74(3):232-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.10.018. Epub 2010 Feb 12.

Abstract

The utility of active surveillance cultures (ASCs) for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been a controversial aspect of infection prevention. This prospective cohort study analyses the effect of ASCs for MRSA on hospital-acquired infections in a tertiary care hospital (hospital 1) and a community-based hospital (hospital 2). Both hospitals have high MRSA prevalence and are part of a large healthcare system in southeastern Michigan. Hospital-acquired infections in the intensive care unit (ICU) and in the rest of the hospital were compared before and after the implementation of ASCs in the ICUs. Patients in hospital 1 with evidence of MRSA colonisation from ASCs were placed in contact isolation during their stay in the ICU; patients from hospital 2 remained in contact isolation throughout their hospital stay. Prevalence of MRSA colonisation on admission to the ICU was 23% and 13% in hospitals 1 and 2, respectively. Average incidence of new colonisation during the study period was 1.85 per 1000 patient-days and 3.47 per 1000 patient-days in hospitals 1 and 2, respectively. A decrease in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) occurred in both hospitals, whereas decrease in hospital-wide nosocomial MRSA infection was demonstrated only in hospital 2. We conclude that, in addition to standard infection prevention initiatives, ASC with contact precautions can be effective in reducing the incidence of VAP and nosocomial MRSA infection in healthcare communities with endemic MRSA.

摘要

主动监测培养(ASCs)在耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)感染预防中的作用一直是一个有争议的问题。这项前瞻性队列研究分析了 ASCs 对密歇根州东南部一家三级保健医院(医院 1)和一家社区医院(医院 2)中 MRSA 医院获得性感染的影响。这两家医院的 MRSA 患病率都很高,并且是大型医疗保健系统的一部分。在 ICU 和医院其他部门实施 ASC 前后,比较了 ICU 和医院其他部门的医院获得性感染。在 ICU 期间,从 ASCs 中发现有 MRSA 定植的医院 1 患者被进行接触隔离;而来自医院 2 的患者在整个住院期间仍处于接触隔离状态。ICU 入院时 MRSA 定植的患病率分别为医院 1 的 23%和医院 2 的 13%。在研究期间,新定植的平均发生率分别为医院 1 的每 1000 个患者日 1.85 例和医院 2 的每 1000 个患者日 3.47 例。两家医院的呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)均有所减少,而只有医院 2 证明了医院范围内的 MRSA 感染减少。我们得出结论,除了标准的感染预防措施外,ASCs 联合接触预防措施可以有效降低具有地方性 MRSA 的医疗机构中 VAP 和医院内 MRSA 感染的发生率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验