Suppr超能文献

预防性屏障预防措施在烧伤病房控制耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的医院内定植和感染中的有效性。

Effectiveness of preemptive barrier precautions in controlling nosocomial colonization and infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a burn unit.

作者信息

Safdar Nasia, Marx John, Meyer Nicholas A, Maki Dennis G

机构信息

Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin Medical School and University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin 53792, USA.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 2006 Oct;34(8):476-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.01.011.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We report the effectiveness of preemptive enhanced barrier precautions in containing a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) outbreak in a university hospital burn unit and further controlling endemic nosocomial MRSA infection in the unit during the succeeding 27 months.

METHODS

During a 6-month period, 12 patients in a 7-bed burn unit were found to be colonized (7) or infected (5) by MRSA. An epidemiologic study was undertaken.

RESULTS

Seven of the 10 strains of MRSA from patients that were available for DNA typing were clonally identical. Early in the outbreak, a health care worker was found to be a concordant nasal carrier and was successfully decolonized with nasal mupirocin. However, despite stringent compliance with isolation of MRSA-positive patients (targeted precautions), new cases of MRSA colonization or infection continued to occur. The outbreak was rapidly terminated after implementing preemptive barrier precautions with all patients in the unit: a new, clean gown and gloves for any physical contact with the patient or their environment. Although 25% of all nosocomial S aureus isolates in our hospital are resistant to methicillin, the incidence of endemic MRSA colonization and infection in the burn unit has remained very low since implementing barrier precautions unit wide (baseline rate, 2.2 [95% CI: 1.0-4.2] cases per 1000 patient-days; outbreak rate, 7.2 [95% CI: 4.4-11.0] cases per 1000 patient-days; post-outbreak termination endemic rate, 1.1 (95% CI: 0.4-2.3) cases per 1000 patient-days). The rate ratio comparing the outbreak and the baseline period was 3.20 (95% CI: 1.40-7.95, P = .002); the rate ratio comparing the post-outbreak period with the baseline period was 0.48 (95% CI: 0.14-1.53, P = .10), and it has not been necessary to screen personnel for MRSA carriage to prevent nosocomial MRSA infections in this highly vulnerable population.

CONCLUSION

Preemptive barrier precautions were highly effective in controlling the outbreak and, most notably, have also been highly effective in maintaining a very low incidence of nosocomial MRSA infection endemically in the succeeding 27 months of follow-up. Use of clean gloves, with or without a gown, bears consideration for all high-risk hospitalized patients to prevent cross transmission of all multiresistant nosocomial pathogens.

摘要

背景

我们报告了在一所大学医院烧伤病房中,采取先发制强化屏障预防措施在控制耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)暴发以及在随后的27个月中进一步控制该病房内医院源性MRSA感染流行方面的有效性。

方法

在6个月期间,发现一间拥有7张床位的烧伤病房中有12名患者被MRSA定植(7例)或感染(5例)。开展了一项流行病学研究。

结果

从患者中获取的用于DNA分型的10株MRSA菌株中有7株克隆型相同。在疫情暴发初期,发现一名医护人员鼻腔携带MRSA且与患者一致,通过鼻腔使用莫匹罗星成功清除了定植菌。然而,尽管严格遵守对MRSA阳性患者的隔离措施(针对性预防措施),MRSA定植或感染的新病例仍不断出现。在对该病房所有患者实施先发制屏障预防措施后疫情迅速终止:与患者或其环境有任何身体接触时均更换新的清洁 gown 和手套。尽管我院所有医院源性金黄色葡萄球菌分离株中有25%对甲氧西林耐药,但自在整个病房实施屏障预防措施以来,烧伤病房内MRSA定植和感染的发生率一直很低(基线发生率,每1000患者日2.2 [95%可信区间:1.0 - 4.2]例;暴发发生率,每1000患者日7.2 [95%可信区间:4.4 - 11.0]例;疫情暴发终止后的流行率,每1000患者日1.1(95%可信区间:0.4 - 2.3)例)。比较暴发期和基线期的率比为3.20(95%可信区间:1.40 - 7.95,P = 0.002);比较疫情暴发后期和基线期的率比为0.48(95%可信区间:0.14 - 1.53,P = 0.10),并且在这个高度易感人群中无需对人员进行MRSA携带筛查来预防医院源性MRSA感染。

结论

先发制屏障预防措施在控制疫情方面非常有效,最值得注意的是,在随后27个月的随访中,在维持医院源性MRSA感染的低发生率方面也非常有效。对于所有高危住院患者,考虑使用清洁手套,无论是否穿 gown,以防止所有多重耐药医院病原体的交叉传播。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验