• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌和结直肠癌 III 期临床试验中医疗疗法的绝对获益。

Absolute benefits of medical therapies in phase III clinical trials for breast and colorectal cancer.

机构信息

Departments of Medical Oncology and Hematology.

Biostatistics, Princess Margaret Hospital and University of Toronto, Toronto.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2010 Jul;21(7):1411-1418. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp552. Epub 2009 Nov 30.

DOI:10.1093/annonc/mdp552
PMID:19951955
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Phase III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have become larger and are powered to detect small absolute benefits. Temporal changes in absolute benefits of experimental medical therapies reported in RCTs are unknown.

METHODS

We identified all RCTs with sample size > or =200 evaluating experimental medical therapies for breast and colorectal cancer published from 1975 to 2007. We assessed changes over three decades in absolute differences in time-to-event end points between experimental and control arms by (i) the usual method (i.e. at one point) and (ii) as the area between time-to-event curves up to a predefined time.

RESULTS

We identified 236 eligible RCTs of which 57% (N = 135) evaluated adjuvant treatments. Experimental treatments became more often compared with active treatments (48% versus 59% versus 81%; P < 0.0001). Median absolute benefits of experimental adjuvant treatments decreased but outcomes in control arms improved with time. For RCTs evaluating metastatic disease, there were no changes in absolute benefit over time but incremental monthly costs of new approved treatments increased with time by 100-fold (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In RCTs of breast and colorectal cancer, new effective adjuvant treatments show decreasing absolute benefit, while new treatments of metastatic disease show unchanging levels of benefit at rapidly escalating costs.

摘要

背景

三期随机临床试验(RCT)的规模不断扩大,旨在检测微小的绝对获益。实验性医学疗法在 RCT 中报告的绝对获益的时间变化尚不清楚。

方法

我们确定了所有样本量大于等于 200 例的 RCT,这些 RCT 评估了 1975 年至 2007 年间用于治疗乳腺癌和结直肠癌的实验性医学疗法。我们通过(i)常规方法(即在一个点)和(ii)在预定时间之前将时间事件曲线之间的区域来评估时间事件终点的绝对差异在三个十年中发生的变化。

结果

我们确定了 236 项符合条件的 RCT,其中 57%(N = 135)评估了辅助治疗。与活性治疗相比,实验性治疗变得越来越常见(48%比 59%比 81%;P < 0.0001)。实验性辅助治疗的中位绝对获益减少,但随着时间的推移,对照臂的结果有所改善。对于评估转移性疾病的 RCT,随着时间的推移,绝对获益没有变化,但新批准的治疗方案的每月增量成本增加了 100 倍(P < 0.0001)。

结论

在乳腺癌和结直肠癌的 RCT 中,新的有效辅助治疗方案显示出绝对获益的减少,而转移性疾病的新治疗方案则显示出不断增加的成本和不变的获益水平。

相似文献

1
Absolute benefits of medical therapies in phase III clinical trials for breast and colorectal cancer.乳腺癌和结直肠癌 III 期临床试验中医疗疗法的绝对获益。
Ann Oncol. 2010 Jul;21(7):1411-1418. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp552. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
2
Comparison of absolute benefits of anticancer therapies determined by snapshot and area methods. snapshot 和 area 方法测定的抗癌疗法绝对获益的比较。
Ann Oncol. 2012 Nov;23(11):2977-2982. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds174. Epub 2012 Jun 24.
3
Assumptions of expected benefits in randomized phase III trials evaluating systemic treatments for cancer.随机 III 期临床试验中评估癌症系统治疗预期获益的假设。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Apr 18;104(8):590-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs141. Epub 2012 Apr 6.
4
Evolution of the randomized controlled trial in oncology over three decades.三十年来肿瘤学领域随机对照试验的发展历程。
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Nov 20;26(33):5458-64. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.5456. Epub 2008 Oct 27.
5
Delivery of meaningful cancer care: a retrospective cohort study assessing cost and benefit with the ASCO and ESMO frameworks.提供有意义的癌症护理:一项使用 ASCO 和 ESMO 框架评估成本和效益的回顾性队列研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Jul;18(7):887-894. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30415-1. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
6
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of capecitabine and tegafur with uracil for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.卡培他滨和替加氟尿嘧啶治疗转移性结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(32):1-93. doi: 10.3310/hta7320.
7
Cost-effectiveness of Maintenance Capecitabine and Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.贝伐珠单抗联合卡培他滨维持治疗转移性结直肠癌的成本效果分析
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;5(2):236-242. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5070.
8
Resampling the N9741 trial to compare tumor dynamic versus conventional end points in randomized phase II trials.重新抽样N9741试验,以比较随机II期试验中肿瘤动力学终点与传统终点。
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 1;33(1):36-41. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.2826. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
9
Hormonal therapies for early breast cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.早期乳腺癌的激素疗法:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Jul;11(26):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-134. doi: 10.3310/hta11260.
10
Follow-up routines in gynecological cancer - time for a change?妇科癌症的随访常规——是时候改变了吗?
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 Jul;90(7):707-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01123.x. Epub 2011 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Putting Patients First: Pragmatic Trials in Gynecologic Oncology.将患者放在首位:妇科肿瘤学中的务实试验
Curr Oncol. 2025 Feb 27;32(3):139. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32030139.
2
Adapting power calculations to include a superiority margin: what are the implications?调整功效计算以纳入优势边界:这意味着什么?
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2024 Feb 15;34(1):010101. doi: 10.11613/BM.2024.010101.
3
Current Scenario of Clinical Cancer Research in Latin America and the Caribbean.拉丁美洲和加勒比地区临床癌症研究的现状。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Jan 4;30(1):653-662. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30010050.
4
Randomized Controlled Trials in Lung, Gastrointestinal, and Breast Cancers: An Overview of Global Research Activity.随机对照试验在肺癌、胃肠道癌和乳腺癌中的应用:全球研究活动概述。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Apr 7;29(4):2530-2538. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29040207.
5
Evolution of the Randomized Clinical Trial in the Era of Precision Oncology.精准肿瘤学时代的随机临床试验演变。
JAMA Oncol. 2021 May 1;7(5):728-734. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0379.
6
Quality of adverse event reporting in phase III randomized controlled trials of breast and colorectal cancer: A systematic review.三期随机对照临床试验中乳腺癌和结直肠癌不良事件报告质量的系统评价。
Cancer Med. 2020 Jul;9(14):5035-5050. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3095. Epub 2020 May 26.
7
Impact of the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review on provincial concordance with respect to cancer drug funding decisions and time to funding.泛加拿大肿瘤药物审查对各省在癌症药物资金决策和资金到位时间方面的一致性的影响。
Curr Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(5):295-301. doi: 10.3747/co.24.3648. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
8
Approvals in 2016: questioning the clinical benefit of anticancer therapies.2016年的批准情况:质疑抗癌疗法的临床益处。
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb 20;14(3):135-136. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.18.
9
Antitumor Effects of Systemic DNAse I and Proteases in an In Vivo Model.体内模型中系统性脱氧核糖核酸酶I和蛋白酶的抗肿瘤作用
Integr Cancer Ther. 2016 Dec;15(4):NP35-NP43. doi: 10.1177/1534735416631102. Epub 2016 May 4.
10
A Time-Trend Economic Analysis of Cancer Drug Trials.癌症药物试验的时间趋势经济分析。
Oncologist. 2015 Jul;20(7):729-36. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0437. Epub 2015 Jun 1.