• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

泛加拿大肿瘤药物审查对各省在癌症药物资金决策和资金到位时间方面的一致性的影响。

Impact of the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review on provincial concordance with respect to cancer drug funding decisions and time to funding.

作者信息

Srikanthan A, Mai H, Penner N, Amir E, Laupacis A, Sabharwal M, Chan K K W

机构信息

Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC; and.

Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review, Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(5):295-301. doi: 10.3747/co.24.3648. Epub 2017 Oct 25.

DOI:10.3747/co.24.3648
PMID:29089796
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5659150/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review (pcodr) was implemented in 2011 to address uneven drug coverage and lack of transparency with respect to the various provincial cancer drug review processes in Canada. We evaluated the impact of the pcodr on provincial decision concordance and time from Notice of Compliance (noc) to drug funding.

METHODS

In a retrospective review, Health Canada's Drug Product Database was used to identify new indications for cancer drugs between January 2003 and May 2014, and provincial formulary listings for drug-funding dates and decisions between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2014 were retrieved. Multiple linear models and quantile regressions were used to evaluate changes in time to decision-making before and after the implementation of the pcodr. Agreement of decisions between provinces was evaluated using kappa statistics.

RESULTS

Data were available from 9 provinces (all Canadian provinces except Quebec), identifying 88 indications that represented 51 unique cancer drugs. Two provinces lacked available data for all 88 indications at the time of data collection. Interprovincial concordance in drug funding decisions significantly increased after the pcodr's implementation (Brennan-Prediger coefficient: 0.54 pre-pcodr vs. 0.78 post-pcodr; = 0.002). Nationwide, the median number of days from Health Canada's noc date to the date of funding significantly declined (to 393 days from 522 days, < 0.001). Exploratory analyses excluding provinces with incomplete data did not change the results.

CONCLUSIONS

After the implementation of the pcodr, greater concordance in cancer drug funding decisions between provinces and decreased time to funding decisions were observed.

摘要

背景

泛加拿大肿瘤药物审查(pcodr)于2011年实施,旨在解决加拿大各省癌症药物审查程序中药物覆盖不均衡和缺乏透明度的问题。我们评估了pcodr对省级决策一致性以及从合规通知(noc)到药物资助时间的影响。

方法

在一项回顾性研究中,利用加拿大卫生部的药品数据库确定2003年1月至2014年5月期间癌症药物的新适应症,并检索2003年1月1日至2014年12月31日期间各省药品目录中药物资助日期和决策信息。使用多元线性模型和分位数回归评估pcodr实施前后决策时间的变化。使用kappa统计量评估各省之间决策的一致性。

结果

有来自9个省(加拿大除魁北克省外的所有省份)的数据,确定了88个适应症,代表51种独特的癌症药物。在数据收集时,有两个省缺乏所有88个适应症的可用数据。pcodr实施后,省际药物资助决策的一致性显著提高(布伦南 - 普雷迪格系数:pcodr实施前为0.54,实施后为0.7

相似文献

1
Impact of the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review on provincial concordance with respect to cancer drug funding decisions and time to funding.泛加拿大肿瘤药物审查对各省在癌症药物资金决策和资金到位时间方面的一致性的影响。
Curr Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(5):295-301. doi: 10.3747/co.24.3648. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
2
Understanding the reasons for provincial discordance in cancer drug funding-a survey of policymakers.了解省级癌症药物资金不一致的原因——对政策制定者的一项调查
Curr Oncol. 2018 Aug;25(4):257-261. doi: 10.3747/co.25.3993. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
3
Provincial elections and timing of cancer drug funding.省级选举与癌症药物资金的时机
Curr Oncol. 2016 Jun;23(3):154-63. doi: 10.3747/co.23.3024. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
4
Determinants of the Cancer Drug Funding Process in Canada.加拿大癌症药物资助流程的决定因素。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Mar 15;29(3):1997-2007. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29030162.
5
Challenges in striving to simultaneously achieve multiple resource allocation goals: the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review (pCODR) example.在努力同时实现多个资源分配目标时面临的挑战:以泛加拿大肿瘤药物审查(pCODR)为例。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2016 Jul 21;4. doi: 10.3402/jmahp.v4.31463. eCollection 2016.
6
Financial conflicts of interest of clinicians making submissions to the pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: a descriptive study.临床医生在向加拿大泛癌症药物审查机构提交申请时的财务利益冲突:一项描述性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 26;9(7):e030750. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030750.
7
Impact of rarity on Canadian oncology health technology assessment and funding.罕见性对加拿大肿瘤学卫生技术评估及资金投入的影响。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Aug 11:1-6. doi: 10.1017/S0266462320000483.
8
New Cancer Drug Approvals From the Perspective of a Universal Healthcare System: Analyses of the Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review Recommendations.从全民医疗保健系统的角度看新癌症药物的审批:对全加肿瘤药物评审建议的分析。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2018 Dec;16(12):1460-1466. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7084.
9
Methodological Issues in Economic Evaluations Submitted to the Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review (pCODR).提交给泛加拿大肿瘤药物评审(pCODR)的经济评估中的方法学问题。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2017 Dec;1(4):255-263. doi: 10.1007/s41669-017-0018-3.
10
Factors Influencing Delays in Patient Access to New Medicines in Canada: A Retrospective Study of Reimbursement Processes in Public Drug Plans.影响加拿大患者获取新药延迟的因素:公共药品计划报销流程的回顾性研究
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Mar 29;10:196. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00196. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
CAR-T Cells in Canada; Perspective on How to Ensure We Get Our Value's Worth.加拿大的 CAR-T 细胞疗法;如何确保物有所值的观点。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Apr 3;30(4):4033-4040. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30040305.
2
Conditional Funding Recommendations for Drugs in Canada: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.加拿大药品有条件资助建议:一项横断面分析。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 Jul;21(4):673-681. doi: 10.1007/s40258-022-00781-6. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
3
Not All Canadian Cancer Patients Are Equal-Disparities in Public Cancer Drug Funding across Canada.并非所有加拿大癌症患者都平等——加拿大各地公共癌症药物资金的差异。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Mar 17;29(3):2064-2072. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29030166.
4
Determinants of the Cancer Drug Funding Process in Canada.加拿大癌症药物资助流程的决定因素。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Mar 15;29(3):1997-2007. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29030162.
5
Potential Life-Years Lost: The Impact of the Cancer Drug Regulatory and Funding Process in Canada.潜在生命年损失:加拿大癌症药物监管和筹资过程的影响。
Oncologist. 2020 Jan;25(1):e130-e137. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0314. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
6
Developing a model of a patient-group pathway to accessing cancer clinical trials in Canada.构建加拿大癌症临床试验患者群体准入途径模型。
Curr Oncol. 2018 Dec;25(6):e597-e609. doi: 10.3747/co.25.4213. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
7
Timeliness of the oncology drug review process for public funding in Canada.加拿大公共资金支持的肿瘤药物审评流程的及时性。
Curr Oncol. 2017 Oct;24(5):279-281. doi: 10.3747/co.24.3825. Epub 2017 Oct 25.

本文引用的文献

1
The Urgent Need for Clinical Research Reform to Permit Faster, Less Expensive Access to New Therapies for Lethal Diseases.临床研究改革的迫切需要,以更快、更廉价地为致命疾病提供新疗法。
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Oct 15;21(20):4561-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-3246.
2
Cancer statistics, 2015.癌症统计数据,2015 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2015 Jan-Feb;65(1):5-29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
3
Informing Canada's cancer drug funding decisions with scientific evidence and patient perspectives: the Pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review.利用科学证据和患者观点为加拿大癌症药物资助决策提供信息:泛加拿大肿瘤药物审查
Curr Oncol. 2013 Apr;20(2):121-4. doi: 10.3747/co.20.1315.
4
Alignment of practice guidelines with targeted-therapy drug funding policies in Ontario.安大略省实践指南与靶向治疗药物资助政策的一致性。
Curr Oncol. 2013 Feb;20(1):e21-33. doi: 10.3747/co.20.1166.
5
Technology assessment for new oncology drugs.肿瘤新药的技术评估。
Clin Cancer Res. 2013 Jan 1;19(1):6-11. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1819.
6
Absolute benefits of medical therapies in phase III clinical trials for breast and colorectal cancer.乳腺癌和结直肠癌 III 期临床试验中医疗疗法的绝对获益。
Ann Oncol. 2010 Jul;21(7):1411-1418. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp552. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
7
American Society of Clinical Oncology guidance statement: the cost of cancer care.美国临床肿瘤学会指导声明:癌症护理的成本
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 10;27(23):3868-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.1183. Epub 2009 Jul 6.