Tsamis Vasiliki J, Rebok George W, Montague David R
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health.
Appl Psychol Crim Justice. 2009 Mar 26;5(1):57-72.
While past research efforts have reported a relationship between encoding ability and aggressive behavior in children, the relationship between encoding ability and adult aggressiveness has not been examined. Encoding, an element of attention, refers to the ability to recall and reorder information stored in memory. Using selected cognitive tests and a self-report measure of aggressive behavior in a sample of community college students (n=55), this study investigated the relationship between encoding ability and aggressive behavior, (i.e., physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger, hostility, indirect aggression, and total aggression). Aggressive behavior was assessed by the Aggression Questionnaire of the Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory, a widely-used measure of aggressive behavior. Encoding was measured using the WAIS-III Digit Span and Arithmetic subtests. Initial analyses showed no significant correlations between the cognitive measures and the five scales of aggressive behavior. However, there was a significant age-related association between scores on the cognitive measures and the indices of aggressive behavior. Two groups were created, those who reported attention problems and those who did not report attention problems. When the two groups were compared, participants who had a history of attention problems were verbally more aggressive than participants with a negative history of attention problems, and they were generally more aggressive. A composite score, called an "encoding score," was related to scores on the aggressive behavior scales. Moreover, the age-related relationship between these two variables suggests that the relationship is maturational and may disappear as an individual ages. Concerning the latter, participants in the current study were enrolled in junior college. Therefore, persons who had attention problems and were aggressive may not have pursued higher education.
虽然过去的研究报告了儿童的编码能力与攻击行为之间的关系,但编码能力与成人攻击性之间的关系尚未得到研究。编码是注意力的一个要素,指的是回忆和重新排列存储在记忆中的信息的能力。本研究在一个社区大学生样本(n = 55)中,使用选定的认知测试和攻击行为的自我报告测量方法,调查了编码能力与攻击行为(即身体攻击、言语攻击、愤怒、敌意、间接攻击和总体攻击)之间的关系。攻击行为通过Buss-Durkee敌意量表中的攻击问卷进行评估,这是一种广泛使用的攻击行为测量方法。编码使用韦氏成人智力量表第三版数字广度和算术分测验进行测量。初步分析显示,认知测量与攻击行为的五个量表之间没有显著相关性。然而,认知测量得分与攻击行为指标之间存在显著的年龄相关关联。创建了两组,一组报告有注意力问题,另一组没有报告注意力问题。当对两组进行比较时,有注意力问题史的参与者在言语上比没有注意力问题史的参与者更具攻击性,而且他们总体上更具攻击性。一个称为“编码分数”的综合分数与攻击行为量表的得分相关。此外,这两个变量之间与年龄相关的关系表明,这种关系是成熟性的,可能会随着个体年龄的增长而消失。关于后者,本研究中的参与者就读于大专院校。因此,有注意力问题且具有攻击性的人可能没有接受高等教育。