• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

干旱胁迫下两个玉米自交系的全基因组转录组分析。

Genome-wide transcriptome analysis of two maize inbred lines under drought stress.

机构信息

Institute of Crop Sciences and National Center for Plant Gene Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Southern Street of Zhongguancun 12, 100081 Beijing, China.

出版信息

Plant Mol Biol. 2010 Mar;72(4-5):407-21. doi: 10.1007/s11103-009-9579-6. Epub 2009 Dec 2.

DOI:10.1007/s11103-009-9579-6
PMID:19953304
Abstract

Drought stress greatly affects plant growth and crop yield. To understand the transcriptome dynamics during drought stress in maize seedlings, genome-wide gene expression profiling was compared between the drought-tolerant line Han21 and drought-sensitive line Ye478 using Affymetrix Maize Genome Array containing 17,555 probe sets. The results showed that in response to drought, the Han21 line had fewer probe sets with significant expression change than the Ye478 line and both lines had a common set of ~2,600 regulated probe sets under drought stress. The potential components of the abscisic acid signaling pathway were significantly identified from the common probe sets. A total of 827 probe sets with significantly differential expression between the two lines under drought stress were identified. The differential expression levels of cell wall-related and transporter genes may contribute to the different tolerances of the two lines. Additionally, we found that, compared to the sensitive line Ye478, the transcriptional levels of drought-responsive probe sets in the tolerant line Han21 recovered more quickly after re-watering, and more probe sets in the tolerant line Han21 were exclusively up-regulated at the re-watering stage. Our study provides a global gene expression dynamics of two maize inbred lines during drought stress and re-watering and will be valuable for further study of the molecular mechanisms of drought tolerance in maize.

摘要

干旱胁迫严重影响植物生长和作物产量。为了了解玉米幼苗在干旱胁迫下的转录组动态,我们使用包含 17555 个探针的 Affymetrix Maize Genome Array 比较了耐旱系 Han21 和干旱敏感系 Ye478 之间的全基因组基因表达谱。结果表明,在干旱胁迫下,Han21 系中具有显著表达变化的探针数比 Ye478 系少,而且两条系都有一个共同的约 2600 个受调控的探针集。从共同的探针集中显著鉴定出脱落酸信号途径的潜在成分。在干旱胁迫下,两条系之间共鉴定出 827 个差异表达的探针集。细胞壁相关和转运基因的差异表达水平可能导致两条系的不同耐受性。此外,我们发现,与敏感系 Ye478 相比,耐旱系 Han21 中干旱响应探针集的转录水平在重新浇水后恢复得更快,耐旱系 Han21 中更多的探针集在重新浇水阶段被特异性地上调。我们的研究提供了两个玉米自交系在干旱胁迫和再浇水过程中的全基因表达动态,这将有助于进一步研究玉米耐旱的分子机制。

相似文献

1
Genome-wide transcriptome analysis of two maize inbred lines under drought stress.干旱胁迫下两个玉米自交系的全基因组转录组分析。
Plant Mol Biol. 2010 Mar;72(4-5):407-21. doi: 10.1007/s11103-009-9579-6. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
2
Key Maize Drought-Responsive Genes and Pathways Revealed by Comparative Transcriptome and Physiological Analyses of Contrasting Inbred Lines.关键玉米抗旱响应基因和途径通过对比自交系的比较转录组和生理分析揭示。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Mar 13;20(6):1268. doi: 10.3390/ijms20061268.
3
Comparative Proteomic and Physiological Analyses of Two Divergent Maize Inbred Lines Provide More Insights into Drought-Stress Tolerance Mechanisms.两种不同玉米自交系的比较蛋白质组学和生理分析为耐旱性机制提供了更多的见解。
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Oct 18;19(10):3225. doi: 10.3390/ijms19103225.
4
Transcriptome Analysis of Tolerant and Susceptible Maize Genotypes Reveals Novel Insights about the Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Drought Responses in Leaves.转录组分析耐旱和敏感型玉米基因型揭示了叶片抗旱响应分子机制的新见解。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jun 29;22(13):6980. doi: 10.3390/ijms22136980.
5
Transcriptome analysis of maize inbred lines differing in drought tolerance provides novel insights into the molecular mechanisms of drought responses in roots.玉米自交系耐旱性差异的转录组分析为根系抗旱响应的分子机制提供了新的见解。
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2020 Apr;149:11-26. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.01.027. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
6
Genome-wide identification of gene expression in contrasting maize inbred lines under field drought conditions reveals the significance of transcription factors in drought tolerance.在田间干旱条件下对不同玉米自交系基因表达进行全基因组鉴定,揭示了转录因子在耐旱性中的重要性。
PLoS One. 2017 Jul 12;12(7):e0179477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179477. eCollection 2017.
7
Comparative transcriptomic analysis of contrasting hybrid cultivars reveal key drought-responsive genes and metabolic pathways regulating drought stress tolerance in maize at various stages.对比分析不同杂交品种的转录组学研究揭示了调控玉米在不同阶段对干旱胁迫耐受性的关键抗旱响应基因和代谢途径。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0240468. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240468. eCollection 2020.
8
Effects of drought stress and water recovery on physiological responses and gene expression in maize seedlings.干旱胁迫及复水对玉米幼苗生理响应和基因表达的影响。
BMC Plant Biol. 2018 Apr 23;18(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1281-x.
9
Transcriptome and GWAS analyses reveal candidate gene for seminal root length of maize seedlings under drought stress.转录组和 GWAS 分析揭示了干旱胁迫下玉米幼苗初生根长的候选基因。
Plant Sci. 2020 Mar;292:110380. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.110380. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
10
Comparative transcriptomic and physiological analyses of contrasting hybrid cultivars ND476 and ZX978 identify important differentially expressed genes and pathways regulating drought stress tolerance in maize.对对比杂交品种ND476和ZX978的转录组和生理分析确定了调控玉米耐旱性的重要差异表达基因和途径。
Genes Genomics. 2020 Aug;42(8):937-955. doi: 10.1007/s13258-020-00962-4. Epub 2020 Jul 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Elimination of Intraspecific Competition Does Not Improve Maize Leaf Physiological and Biochemical Responses to Topsoil Degradation.消除种内竞争并不能改善玉米叶片对表土退化的生理生化响应。
Plants (Basel). 2025 Aug 9;14(16):2470. doi: 10.3390/plants14162470.
2
Identification of Drought-Resistant Response in Proso Millet ( L.) Root through Physiological and Transcriptomic Analysis.通过生理和转录组学分析鉴定黍稷(Panicum miliaceum L.)根系的抗旱响应
Plants (Basel). 2024 Jun 19;13(12):1693. doi: 10.3390/plants13121693.
3
Possible melatonin-induced salt stress tolerance pathway in Phaseolus vulgaris L. using transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses.

本文引用的文献

1
Distinctive transcriptome responses to adverse environmental conditions in Zea mays L.玉米对不利环境条件的独特转录组反应
Plant Biotechnol J. 2008 Oct;6(8):782-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2008.00360.x. Epub 2008 Jul 8.
2
Arabidopsis DREB2A-interacting proteins function as RING E3 ligases and negatively regulate plant drought stress-responsive gene expression.拟南芥中与DREB2A相互作用的蛋白作为环状E3连接酶发挥作用,并负向调控植物干旱胁迫响应基因的表达。
Plant Cell. 2008 Jun;20(6):1693-707. doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.057380. Epub 2008 Jun 13.
3
Activated expression of an Arabidopsis HD-START protein confers drought tolerance with improved root system and reduced stomatal density.
利用转录组学和代谢组学分析研究菜豆对褪黑素诱导盐胁迫耐受的可能途径。
BMC Plant Biol. 2024 Jan 25;24(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12870-023-04705-x.
4
Transcriptional survey of abiotic stress response in maize () in the level of gene co-expression network and differential gene correlation analysis.基于基因共表达网络水平和差异基因相关性分析的玉米非生物胁迫响应转录组学研究
AoB Plants. 2023 Dec 22;16(1):plad087. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plad087. eCollection 2024 Jan.
5
Expression complementation of gene presence/absence polymorphisms in hybrids contributes importantly to heterosis in sunflower.杂种中基因存在/缺失多态性的表达互补对向日葵杂种优势的形成有重要贡献。
J Adv Res. 2022 Dec;42:83-98. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2022.04.008. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
6
Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Symbiosis Differentially Affects the Nutritional Status of Two Durum Wheat Genotypes under Drought Conditions.丛枝菌根共生在干旱条件下对两种硬粒小麦基因型的营养状况有不同影响。
Plants (Basel). 2022 Mar 17;11(6):804. doi: 10.3390/plants11060804.
7
Rehydration Compensation of Winter Wheat Is Mediated by Hormone Metabolism and De-Peroxidative Activities Under Field Conditions.田间条件下冬小麦的复水补偿作用由激素代谢和抗过氧化活性介导。
Front Plant Sci. 2022 Feb 24;13:823846. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.823846. eCollection 2022.
8
Differential response of physiology and metabolic response to drought stress in different sweetpotato cultivars.不同甘薯品种对干旱胁迫的生理和代谢响应差异
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 10;17(3):e0264847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264847. eCollection 2022.
9
Key Soybean Seedlings Drought-Responsive Genes and Pathways Revealed by Comparative Transcriptome Analyses of Two Cultivars.两种栽培品种比较转录组分析揭示的大豆幼苗抗旱相关基因及途径。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Mar 7;23(5):2893. doi: 10.3390/ijms23052893.
10
Comparative Transcriptomics and Gene Knockout Reveal Virulence Factors of in .比较转录组学和基因敲除揭示了[具体物种名称]中的毒力因子。 (你提供的原文中“in.”后面缺少具体内容,我根据语境补充了这部分以使译文更完整)
J Fungi (Basel). 2021 Nov 24;7(12):1001. doi: 10.3390/jof7121001.
拟南芥HD-START蛋白的激活表达赋予了耐旱性,其根系得到改善,气孔密度降低。
Plant Cell. 2008 Apr;20(4):1134-51. doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.058263. Epub 2008 Apr 30.
4
Plant nuclear factor Y (NF-Y) B subunits confer drought tolerance and lead to improved corn yields on water-limited acres.植物核因子Y(NF-Y)B亚基赋予植物耐旱性,并能在水资源有限的土地上提高玉米产量。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 16;104(42):16450-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707193104. Epub 2007 Oct 8.
5
Perception and transduction of abscisic acid signals: keys to the function of the versatile plant hormone ABA.脱落酸信号的感知与转导:多功能植物激素脱落酸功能的关键
Trends Plant Sci. 2007 Aug;12(8):343-51. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.06.013. Epub 2007 Jul 12.
6
Identification of two protein kinases required for abscisic acid regulation of seed germination, root growth, and gene expression in Arabidopsis.鉴定拟南芥中脱落酸调控种子萌发、根系生长和基因表达所需的两种蛋白激酶。
Plant Cell. 2007 Feb;19(2):485-94. doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.048538. Epub 2007 Feb 16.
7
Oxidative modifications to cellular components in plants.植物细胞成分的氧化修饰。
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2007;58:459-81. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.103946.
8
Overexpressing a NAM, ATAF, and CUC (NAC) transcription factor enhances drought resistance and salt tolerance in rice.过表达一个NAM、ATAF和CUC(NAC)转录因子可增强水稻的抗旱性和耐盐性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Aug 29;103(35):12987-92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0604882103. Epub 2006 Aug 21.
9
Role of DREB transcription factors in abiotic and biotic stress tolerance in plants.DREB转录因子在植物非生物和生物胁迫耐受性中的作用。
Plant Cell Rep. 2006 Dec;25(12):1263-74. doi: 10.1007/s00299-006-0204-8. Epub 2006 Jul 21.
10
Transcriptional regulatory networks in cellular responses and tolerance to dehydration and cold stresses.细胞对脱水和冷胁迫响应及耐受性中的转录调控网络。
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:781-803. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105444.