Department of Psychiatry, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 May;34(6):897-921. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.11.022. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
Categorization of psychotic illnesses into schizophrenic and affective psychoses remains an ongoing controversy. Although Kraepelinian subtyping of psychosis was historically beneficial, modern genetic and neurophysiological studies do not support dichotomous conceptualization of psychosis. Evidence suggests that schizophrenia and bipolar disorder rather present a clinical continuum with partially overlapping symptom dimensions, neurophysiology, genetics and treatment responses. Recent large scale genetic studies have produced inconsistent findings and exposed an urgent need for re-thinking phenomenology-based approach in psychiatric research. Epidemiological, linkage and molecular genetic studies, as well as studies in intermediate phenotypes (neurocognitive, neurophysiological and anatomical imaging) in schizophrenia and bipolar disorders are reviewed in order to support a dimensional conceptualization of psychosis. Overlapping and unique genetic and intermediate phenotypic signatures of the two psychoses are comprehensively recapitulated. Alternative strategies which may be implicated into genetic research are discussed.
将精神病分为精神分裂症和情感性精神病仍然存在争议。虽然精神疾病的克雷佩林亚型在历史上是有益的,但现代遗传和神经生理学研究并不支持精神分裂症的二分法概念。有证据表明,精神分裂症和双相情感障碍呈现出一种临床连续体,部分重叠的症状维度、神经生理学、遗传学和治疗反应。最近的大规模遗传研究得出了不一致的结果,迫切需要重新思考精神科研究中基于现象学的方法。本文综述了精神分裂症和双相情感障碍的流行病学、连锁和分子遗传学研究,以及中间表型(神经认知、神经生理学和解剖影像学)的研究,以支持精神分裂症的维度概念化。全面总结了这两种精神病重叠和独特的遗传和中间表型特征。还讨论了可能涉及遗传研究的替代策略。