arc Epidemiology Unit, School of Translational Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
J Rheumatol. 2010 Feb;37(2):322-9. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.090306. Epub 2009 Dec 1.
Accelerated atherosclerosis and premature coronary heart disease (CHD) are recognized complications of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), but the exact etiology remains unclear and is likely to be multifactorial. We hypothesized that SLE patients with CHD have increased exposure to traditional risk factors as well as differing disease phenotype and therapy-related factors compared to SLE patients free of CHD. Our aim was to examine risk factors for development of clinical CHD in SLE in the clinical setting.
In a UK-wide multicenter retrospective case-control study we recruited 53 SLE patients with verified clinical CHD (myocardial infarction or angina pectoris) and 96 SLE patients without clinical CHD. Controls were recruited from the same center as the case and matched by disease duration. Charts were reviewed up to time of event for cases, or the same "dummy-date" in controls.
SLE patients with clinical CHD were older at the time of event [mean (SD) 53 (10) vs 42 (10) yrs; p < 0.001], more likely to be male [11 (20%) vs 3 (7%); p < 0.001], and had more exposure to all classic CHD risk factors compared to SLE patients without clinical CHD. They were also more likely to have been treated with corticosteroids (OR 2.46; 95% CI 1.03, 5.88) and azathioprine (OR 2.33; 95% CI 1.16, 4.67) and to have evidence of damage on the pre-event SLICC damage index (SDI) (OR 2.20; 95% CI 1.09, 4.44). There was no difference between groups with regard to clinical organ involvement or autoantibody profile.
Our study highlights the need for clinical vigilance to identify modifiable risk factors in the clinical setting and in particular with male patients. The pattern of organ involvement did not differ in SLE patients with CHD events. However, the higher pre-event SDI, azathioprine exposure, and pattern of damage items (disease-related rather than therapy-related) in cases suggests that a persistent active lupus phenotype contributes to CHD risk. In this regard, corticosteroids and azathioprine may not control disease well enough to prevent CHD. Clinical trials are needed to determine whether classic risk factor modification will have a role in primary prevention of CHD in SLE patients and whether new therapies that control disease activity can better reduce CHD risk.
加速的动脉粥样硬化和过早的冠心病(CHD)是系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)公认的并发症,但确切的病因仍不清楚,可能是多因素的。我们假设,与没有 CHD 的 SLE 患者相比,患有 CHD 的 SLE 患者暴露于传统危险因素以及不同的疾病表型和治疗相关因素的可能性更大。我们的目的是在临床环境中检查 SLE 患者发生临床 CHD 的危险因素。
在一项英国范围内的多中心回顾性病例对照研究中,我们招募了 53 名经证实患有临床 CHD(心肌梗死或心绞痛)的 SLE 患者和 96 名无临床 CHD 的 SLE 患者。对照组是从病例的同一中心招募的,并按疾病持续时间进行匹配。对病例的时间到事件进行图表审查,或对对照组的相同“虚拟日期”进行审查。
患有临床 CHD 的 SLE 患者在事件发生时年龄更大[平均(SD)53(10)岁与 42(10)岁;p <0.001],更可能是男性[11(20%)与 3(7%);p <0.001],与无临床 CHD 的 SLE 患者相比,他们接触所有经典 CHD 危险因素的可能性更大。他们也更有可能接受皮质类固醇(OR 2.46;95%CI 1.03,5.88)和硫唑嘌呤(OR 2.33;95%CI 1.16,4.67)治疗,并且在事件发生前的 SLICC 损害指数(SDI)上有损害证据(OR 2.20;95%CI 1.09,4.44)。两组之间在临床器官受累或自身抗体谱方面没有差异。
我们的研究强调了在临床环境中识别可改变的危险因素的必要性,特别是对于男性患者。在患有 CHD 事件的 SLE 患者中,器官受累的模式没有差异。然而,病例中更高的预事件 SDI、硫唑嘌呤暴露以及损害项目的模式(与疾病相关而不是与治疗相关)表明持续的活跃狼疮表型会增加 CHD 风险。在这方面,皮质类固醇和硫唑嘌呤可能无法很好地控制疾病,从而无法预防 SLE 患者的 CHD。需要进行临床试验以确定经典危险因素的改变是否在 SLE 患者的 CHD 一级预防中发挥作用,以及控制疾病活动的新疗法是否可以更好地降低 CHD 风险。