• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Agricultural intensification and changes in cultivated areas, 1970-2005.农业集约化和耕地面积变化,1970-2005 年。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 8;106(49):20675-80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812540106. Epub 2009 Dec 1.
2
Population growth, internal migration, and environmental degradation in rural areas of developing countries.发展中国家农村地区的人口增长、内部迁移与环境退化。
Eur J Popul. 1992;8(2):125-48. doi: 10.1007/BF01797549.
3
Agricultural intensification in Brazil and its effects on land-use patterns: an analysis of the 1975-2006 period.巴西农业集约化及其对土地利用模式的影响:1975-2006 年期间的分析。
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Jun;19(6):1804-15. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12174. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
4
Pasture intensification is insufficient to relieve pressure on conservation priority areas in open agricultural markets.在开放的农产品市场中,加强牧场管理不足以缓解对保护优先地区的压力。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Jul;24(7):3199-3213. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14272. Epub 2018 May 4.
5
Winners and losers of national and global efforts to reconcile agricultural intensification and biodiversity conservation.国家和全球努力协调农业集约化和生物多样性保护的赢家和输家。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 May;24(5):2212-2228. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14076. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
6
A long-term forecast analysis on worldwide land uses.全球土地利用的长期预测分析。
Environ Monit Assess. 2006 Aug;119(1-3):609-20. doi: 10.1007/s10661-005-9046-z. Epub 2006 Jun 2.
7
Projected water consumption in future global agriculture: scenarios and related impacts.未来全球农业的预计耗水量:情景与相关影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2011 Sep 15;409(20):4206-16. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.07.019. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
8
Global cropland intensification surpassed expansion between 2000 and 2010: A spatio-temporal analysis based on GlobeLand30.2000 年至 2010 年间,全球耕地集约化程度超过了耕地扩张速度:基于 GlobeLand30 的时空分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Dec 1;746:141035. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141035. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
9
Land-use change from market responses to oil palm intensification in Indonesia.印尼市场应对油棕集约化的土地利用变化。
Conserv Biol. 2024 Feb;38(1):e14149. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14149. Epub 2023 Sep 26.
10
Spatio-temporal pattern and rationality of land reclamation and cropland abandonment in mid-eastern Inner Mongolia of China in 1990-2005.1990-2005 年中国内蒙古中东部耕地开垦与撂荒的时空格局及其合理性。
Environ Monit Assess. 2011 Aug;179(1-4):137-53. doi: 10.1007/s10661-010-1724-9. Epub 2010 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Adoption of improved crop varieties limited biodiversity losses, terrestrial carbon emissions, and cropland expansion in the tropics.采用改良作物品种限制了热带地区的生物多样性丧失、陆地碳排放和农田扩张。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Feb 11;122(6):e2404839122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2404839122. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
2
Using the natural capital framework to integrate biodiversity into sustainable, efficient and equitable environmental-economic decision-making.利用自然资本框架将生物多样性纳入可持续、高效和公平的环境经济决策。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Jan 9;380(1917):20230215. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0215.
3
Population declines of a widespread amphibian in agricultural landscapes.农业景观中广泛分布的两栖动物数量下降。
Naturwissenschaften. 2024 Mar 18;111(2):17. doi: 10.1007/s00114-024-01905-9.
4
Health burden from food systems is highly unequal across income groups.各收入组人群因食物系统导致的健康负担存在严重的不平等。
Nat Food. 2024 Mar;5(3):251-261. doi: 10.1038/s43016-024-00946-7. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
5
Agriculture land use transformation: A threat to sustainable food production systems, rural food security, and farmer well-being?农业土地利用转型:对可持续粮食生产系统、农村粮食安全和农民福祉的威胁?
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 24;19(1):e0296332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296332. eCollection 2024.
6
Benefits and trade-offs of optimizing global land use for food, water, and carbon.优化全球土地用于粮食、水和碳的益处与权衡。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 17;120(42):e2220371120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2220371120. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
7
Impact of small farmers' access to improved seeds and deforestation in DR Congo.刚果民主共和国小农获取改良种子与森林砍伐的影响。
Nat Commun. 2023 Mar 23;14(1):1603. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37278-2.
8
Recent and future declines of a historically widespread pollinator linked to climate, land cover, and pesticides.近年来,由于气候、土地覆盖和农药的影响,一种历史上广泛分布的传粉媒介数量出现了下降,这种情况在未来还将继续。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Jan 31;120(5):e2211223120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2211223120. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
9
Mapping abandoned cropland using Within-Year Sentinel-2 time series.利用年内哨兵-2时间序列绘制废弃农田地图。
Catena (Amst). 2023 Apr;223:106924. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2023.106924. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
10
Testing the niche reduction hypothesis for a fossorial rodent () experiencing agricultural intensification.检验一个经历农业集约化的穴居啮齿动物()的生态位缩减假说。
Ecol Evol. 2022 Dec 12;12(12):e9559. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9559. eCollection 2022 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Dematerialization: Variety, caution, and persistence.非物质化:多样性、谨慎与坚持。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 2;105(35):12774-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806099105. Epub 2008 Aug 26.
2
Climate. Food security under climate change.气候。气候变化下的粮食安全。
Science. 2008 Feb 1;319(5863):580-1. doi: 10.1126/science.1154102.
3
Difficulties in tracking the long-term global trend in tropical forest area.追踪热带森林面积长期全球趋势存在困难。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 15;105(2):818-23. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703015105. Epub 2008 Jan 9.
4
Feeding a hungry world.养活饥饿的世界。
Science. 2007 Oct 19;318(5849):359. doi: 10.1126/science.1151062.
5
Agricultural intensification: will land spared from farming be land spared for nature?农业集约化:从农业中腾出的土地会成为留给自然的土地吗?
Conserv Biol. 2006 Jun;20(3):709-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00442.x.
6
Agriculture. Losing the links between livestock and land.农业。失去牲畜与土地之间的联系。
Science. 2005 Dec 9;310(5754):1621-2. doi: 10.1126/science.1117856.
7
Farming and the fate of wild nature.农业与野生自然的命运。
Science. 2005 Jan 28;307(5709):550-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1106049. Epub 2004 Dec 23.

农业集约化和耕地面积变化,1970-2005 年。

Agricultural intensification and changes in cultivated areas, 1970-2005.

机构信息

Department of Human Ecology, Rutgers University, 55 Dudley Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 8;106(49):20675-80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812540106. Epub 2009 Dec 1.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.0812540106
PMID:19955435
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2791618/
Abstract

Does the intensification of agriculture reduce cultivated areas and, in so doing, spare some lands by concentrating production on other lands? Such sparing is important for many reasons, among them the enhanced abilities of released lands to sequester carbon and provide other environmental services. Difficulties measuring the extent of spared land make it impossible to investigate fully the hypothesized causal chain from agricultural intensification to declines in cultivated areas and then to increases in spared land. We analyze the historical circumstances in which rising yields have been accompanied by declines in cultivated areas, thereby leading to land-sparing. We use national-level United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization data on trends in cropland from 1970-2005, with particular emphasis on the 1990-2005 period, for 10 major crop types. Cropland has increased more slowly than population during this period, but paired increases in yields and declines in cropland occurred infrequently, both globally and nationally. Agricultural intensification was not generally accompanied by decline or stasis in cropland area at a national scale during this time period, except in countries with grain imports and conservation set-aside programs. Future projections of cropland abandonment and ensuing environmental services cannot be assumed without explicit policy intervention.

摘要

农业集约化是否会减少耕地面积,从而通过将生产集中在其他土地上来腾出一些土地?这种腾出对于许多原因来说很重要,其中包括释放土地封存碳和提供其他环境服务的能力增强。由于难以衡量腾出土地的程度,因此无法全面调查农业集约化导致耕地面积减少,然后导致腾出土地增加的假设因果链。我们分析了在这种情况下,为什么产量的上升伴随着耕地面积的下降,从而导致了土地腾出。我们使用联合国粮食及农业组织(FAO)1970-2005 年各国关于耕地趋势的数据,重点是 1990-2005 年期间,涵盖 10 种主要作物类型。在此期间,耕地的增长速度慢于人口增长速度,但全球和各国的产量增长与耕地减少同时发生的情况并不常见。在此期间,除了粮食进口国和保护预留计划的国家外,农业集约化通常不会导致国家范围内耕地面积的减少或停滞。如果没有明确的政策干预,未来对耕地废弃和随之而来的环境服务的预测是不可靠的。