Department of Human Ecology, Rutgers University, 55 Dudley Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Dec 8;106(49):20675-80. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812540106. Epub 2009 Dec 1.
Does the intensification of agriculture reduce cultivated areas and, in so doing, spare some lands by concentrating production on other lands? Such sparing is important for many reasons, among them the enhanced abilities of released lands to sequester carbon and provide other environmental services. Difficulties measuring the extent of spared land make it impossible to investigate fully the hypothesized causal chain from agricultural intensification to declines in cultivated areas and then to increases in spared land. We analyze the historical circumstances in which rising yields have been accompanied by declines in cultivated areas, thereby leading to land-sparing. We use national-level United Nations Food and Agricultural Organization data on trends in cropland from 1970-2005, with particular emphasis on the 1990-2005 period, for 10 major crop types. Cropland has increased more slowly than population during this period, but paired increases in yields and declines in cropland occurred infrequently, both globally and nationally. Agricultural intensification was not generally accompanied by decline or stasis in cropland area at a national scale during this time period, except in countries with grain imports and conservation set-aside programs. Future projections of cropland abandonment and ensuing environmental services cannot be assumed without explicit policy intervention.
农业集约化是否会减少耕地面积,从而通过将生产集中在其他土地上来腾出一些土地?这种腾出对于许多原因来说很重要,其中包括释放土地封存碳和提供其他环境服务的能力增强。由于难以衡量腾出土地的程度,因此无法全面调查农业集约化导致耕地面积减少,然后导致腾出土地增加的假设因果链。我们分析了在这种情况下,为什么产量的上升伴随着耕地面积的下降,从而导致了土地腾出。我们使用联合国粮食及农业组织(FAO)1970-2005 年各国关于耕地趋势的数据,重点是 1990-2005 年期间,涵盖 10 种主要作物类型。在此期间,耕地的增长速度慢于人口增长速度,但全球和各国的产量增长与耕地减少同时发生的情况并不常见。在此期间,除了粮食进口国和保护预留计划的国家外,农业集约化通常不会导致国家范围内耕地面积的减少或停滞。如果没有明确的政策干预,未来对耕地废弃和随之而来的环境服务的预测是不可靠的。