• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准用药图表对处方错误的影响:一项前后对照审计

Impact of a standard medication chart on prescribing errors: a before-and-after audit.

作者信息

Coombes I D, Stowasser D A, Reid C, Mitchell C A

机构信息

Safe Medication Practice Unit, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Level 13, Block 7, Herston Rd, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Dec;18(6):478-85. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.025296.

DOI:10.1136/qshc.2007.025296
PMID:19955461
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

(1) To develop and implement a standard medication chart, for recording prescribing (medication orders) and administration of medication in public hospitals in Queensland. (2) To assess the chart's impact on the frequency and type of prescribing errors, adverse drug reaction (ADR) documentation and safety of warfarin prescribing. (3) To use the chart to facilitate safe medication management training.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The medication chart was developed through a process of incident analysis and work practice mapping by a multidisciplinary collaborative. Observational audits by nurse and pharmacist pairs, of all available prescriptions before and after introduction of the standard medication chart, were undertaken in five sites.

RESULTS

Similar numbers of both patients (730 pre-implementation and 751 post-implementation; orders, 9772 before and 10 352 after) were observed. The prescribing error rate decreased from 20.0% of orders per patient before to 15.8% after (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.03). Previous ADRs were not documented for 19.5% of 185 patients before and 11.2% of 197 patients after (chi(2), p = 0.032). Prescribing errors involving selection of a drug to which a patient had had a previous ADR decreased from 11.3% of patients before to 4.6% after (chi(2), p = 0.021). International normalised ratios (INRs) >5 decreased from 1.9% of 14 405 INRs in the 12 months before to 1.45% of 15 090 INRs after (chi(2), p = 0.004). After minor modifications, the chart was introduced into all hospitals statewide, which enabled standardised medication training and safer rotation of staff. The chart also formed the basis for the National Inpatient Medication Chart.

CONCLUSION

Introduction of a standard revised medication chart significantly reduced the frequency of prescribing errors, improved ADR documentation and decreased the potential risks associated with warfarin management. The standard chart has enabled uniform training in medicine management.

摘要

目的

(1)制定并实施一份标准用药图表,用于记录昆士兰州公立医院的处方开具(用药医嘱)及用药情况。(2)评估该图表对处方错误的频率和类型、药物不良反应(ADR)记录以及华法林处方安全性的影响。(3)使用该图表促进安全用药管理培训。

设计、地点和参与者:通过多学科协作进行事件分析和工作流程映射的过程制定了用药图表。护士和药剂师对在五个地点对标准用药图表引入前后所有可用处方进行了观察性审核。

结果

观察到的患者数量相似(实施前730例,实施后751例;医嘱数量,实施前9772条,实施后10352条)。处方错误率从每位患者医嘱的20.0%降至实施后的15.8%(曼 - 惠特尼U检验,p = 0.03)。在185例患者中,之前有19.5%的患者未记录ADR,实施后在197例患者中这一比例为11.2%(卡方检验,p = 0.032)。涉及选择患者曾有ADR的药物的处方错误从之前患者的11.3%降至实施后的4.6%(卡方检验,p = 0.021)。国际标准化比值(INR)>5的情况从实施前12个月14405个INR中的1.9%降至实施后15090个INR中的1.45%(卡方检验,p = 0.004)。经过微小修改后,该图表在全州所有医院推行,这使得用药培训标准化且工作人员轮岗更安全。该图表还构成了国家住院患者用药图表的基础。

结论

引入标准修订用药图表显著降低了处方错误的频率,改善了ADR记录,并降低了与华法林管理相关的潜在风险。该标准图表实现了用药管理的统一培训。

相似文献

1
Impact of a standard medication chart on prescribing errors: a before-and-after audit.标准用药图表对处方错误的影响:一项前后对照审计
Qual Saf Health Care. 2009 Dec;18(6):478-85. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2007.025296.
2
Pilot of a National Inpatient Medication Chart in Australia: improving prescribing safety and enabling prescribing training.澳大利亚国家住院患者用药图表的试点工作:提高处方安全性并为处方培训提供支持。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Aug;72(2):338-49. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.03967.x.
3
The national inpatient medication chart: critical audit of design and performance at a tertiary hospital.国家住院患者用药图表:对一家三级医院的设计与性能的严格审核
Med J Aust. 2008 Jan 21;188(2):95-9. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01863.x.
4
Adherence to the Australian National Inpatient Medication Chart: the efficacy of a uniform national drug chart on improving prescription error.澳大利亚国家住院患者用药图表依从性:统一国家药物图表对减少处方错误的效果。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Oct;19(5):769-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01847.x. Epub 2012 May 8.
5
Long-term reduction in adverse drug events: an evidence-based improvement model.长期减少药物不良事件:基于证据的改进模型。
Pediatrics. 2012 May;129(5):e1334-42. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1902. Epub 2012 Apr 2.
6
The impact of a closed-loop electronic prescribing and administration system on prescribing errors, administration errors and staff time: a before-and-after study.闭环电子处方与给药系统对处方错误、给药错误及员工时间的影响:一项前后对照研究。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Aug;16(4):279-84. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019497.
7
What are incident reports telling us? A comparative study at two Australian hospitals of medication errors identified at audit, detected by staff and reported to an incident system.事件报告告诉了我们什么?对澳大利亚两家医院进行的一项比较研究,该研究涉及在审计中发现、由工作人员检测到并报告给事件系统的用药错误。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Feb;27(1):1-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu098. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
8
The epidemiology of prescribing errors: the potential impact of computerized prescriber order entry.处方错误的流行病学:计算机化医嘱录入的潜在影响。
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Apr 12;164(7):785-92. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.7.785.
9
Improving the quality of written prescriptions in a general hospital: the influence of 10 years of serial audits and targeted interventions.提高综合医院手写处方质量:连续十年的系列审核及针对性干预的影响
Intern Med J. 2008 Apr;38(4):243-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2007.01518.x. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
10
Assessing medication prescribing errors in pediatric intensive care units.评估儿科重症监护病房的用药处方错误。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004 Mar;5(2):124-32. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000112371.26138.E8.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences in medication reconciliation interventions between six hospitals: a mixed method study.六家医院之间药物重整干预措施的差异:一项混合方法研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 31;22(1):722. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08118-8.
2
Benefits of medication charts provided at transitions of care: a narrative systematic review.在护理转接时提供用药图表的益处:一项叙述性系统评价
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 22;10(10):e037668. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037668.
3
Medication-related issues associated with the documentation and administration of long-acting injectable antipsychotics.
与长效注射抗精神病药物的记录和管理相关的药物问题。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Jun;41(3):623-629. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00814-6. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
4
Prescribing errors by junior doctors- A comparison of errors with high risk medicines and non-high risk medicines.初级医生的处方错误——高风险药物与非高风险药物的错误比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 31;14(1):e0211270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211270. eCollection 2019.
5
Fatal prescription charts.致命的处方图表。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Mar;84(3):417-418. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13473. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
6
Methods to reduce prescribing errors in elderly patients with multimorbidity.减少老年多病患者处方错误的方法。
Clin Interv Aging. 2016 Jun 23;11:857-66. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S80280. eCollection 2016.
7
Improving Medication Reconciliation on the Surgical Wards of a District General Hospital.改善地区综合医院外科病房的用药核对工作。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2012 Dec 18;1(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u200373.w323. eCollection 2012.
8
Redesigning the 'choice architecture' of hospital prescription charts: a mixed methods study incorporating in situ simulation testing.重新设计医院处方笺的“选择架构”:一项纳入现场模拟测试的混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 4;4(12):e005473. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005473.
9
Use of the Delphi technique to determine safety features to be included in a neonatal and paediatric prescription chart.运用德尔菲法确定新生儿及儿科处方笺应包含的安全特征。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2014 Dec;36(6):1179-89. doi: 10.1007/s11096-014-0014-y. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
10
Initiatives promoting seamless care in medication management: an international review of the grey literature.促进药物管理无缝护理的举措:灰色文献的国际综述。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2013 Dec;35(6):1040-52. doi: 10.1007/s11096-013-9844-2.