Suppr超能文献

闭环电子处方与给药系统对处方错误、给药错误及员工时间的影响:一项前后对照研究。

The impact of a closed-loop electronic prescribing and administration system on prescribing errors, administration errors and staff time: a before-and-after study.

作者信息

Franklin Bryony Dean, O'Grady Kara, Donyai Parastou, Jacklin Ann, Barber Nick

机构信息

Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Aug;16(4):279-84. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019497.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of a closed-loop electronic prescribing, automated dispensing, barcode patient identification and electronic medication administration record (EMAR) system on prescribing and administration errors, confirmation of patient identity before administration, and staff time.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Before-and-after study in a surgical ward of a teaching hospital, involving patients and staff of that ward.

INTERVENTION

Closed-loop electronic prescribing, automated dispensing, barcode patient identification and EMAR system.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Percentage of new medication orders with a prescribing error, percentage of doses with medication administration errors (MAEs) and percentage given without checking patient identity. Time spent prescribing and providing a ward pharmacy service. Nursing time on medication tasks.

RESULTS

Prescribing errors were identified in 3.8% of 2450 medication orders pre-intervention and 2.0% of 2353 orders afterwards (p<0.001; chi(2) test). MAEs occurred in 7.0% of 1473 non-intravenous doses pre-intervention and 4.3% of 1139 afterwards (p = 0.005; chi(2) test). Patient identity was not checked for 82.6% of 1344 doses pre-intervention and 18.9% of 1291 afterwards (p<0.001; chi(2) test). Medical staff required 15 s to prescribe a regular inpatient drug pre-intervention and 39 s afterwards (p = 0.03; t test). Time spent providing a ward pharmacy service increased from 68 min to 98 min each weekday (p = 0.001; t test); 22% of drug charts were unavailable pre-intervention. Time per drug administration round decreased from 50 min to 40 min (p = 0.006; t test); nursing time on medication tasks outside of drug rounds increased from 21.1% to 28.7% (p = 0.006; chi(2) test).

CONCLUSIONS

A closed-loop electronic prescribing, dispensing and barcode patient identification system reduced prescribing errors and MAEs, and increased confirmation of patient identity before administration. Time spent on medication-related tasks increased.

摘要

目的

评估闭环电子处方、自动配药、条形码患者识别和电子用药记录(EMAR)系统对处方和用药错误、用药前患者身份确认以及工作人员时间的影响。

设计、场所和参与者:在一家教学医院的外科病房进行前后对照研究,涉及该病房的患者和工作人员。

干预措施

闭环电子处方、自动配药、条形码患者识别和EMAR系统。

主要观察指标

有处方错误的新用药医嘱百分比、有用药错误(MAE)的剂量百分比以及未核对患者身份就给药的百分比。开处方和提供病房药房服务所花费的时间。护理人员在用药任务上花费的时间。

结果

干预前2450份用药医嘱中有3.8%存在处方错误,干预后2353份医嘱中有2.0%存在处方错误(p<0.001;卡方检验)。干预前1473份非静脉用药剂量中有7.0%发生MAE,干预后1139份中有4.3%发生MAE(p = 0.005;卡方检验)。干预前1344剂中有82.6%未核对患者身份,干预后1291剂中有18.9%未核对(p<0.001;卡方检验)。干预前医护人员开一份普通住院患者药物处方需要15秒,干预后需要39秒(p = 0.03;t检验)。每个工作日提供病房药房服务的时间从68分钟增加到98分钟(p = 0.001;t检验);干预前22%的药历无法获取。每次用药查房时间从50分钟减少到40分钟(p = 0.006;t检验);护理人员在非用药查房期间的用药任务时间从21.1%增加到28.7%(p = 0.006;卡方检验)。

结论

闭环电子处方、配药和条形码患者识别系统减少了处方错误和MAE,并增加了用药前患者身份的确认。与用药相关任务所花费的时间增加了。

相似文献

3
Qualitative evaluation of an electronic prescribing and administration system.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Aug;16(4):271-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019505.
4
Influence of computerised medication charts on medication errors in a hospital.
Drug Saf. 2005;28(12):1119-29. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200528120-00006.
5
[Closed-loop medication management: Results of a user survey].
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Oct;146:43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.08.005. Epub 2019 Sep 14.
7
Integration of a Commercial Barcode-Assisted Medication Dispensing System in a Teaching Hospital.
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Aug;10(4):615-624. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1694749. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
8
Effectiveness of an electronic inpatient medication record in reducing medication errors in Singapore.
Nurs Health Sci. 2014 Jun;16(2):245-54. doi: 10.1111/nhs.12078. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
9
Prescribing errors resulting in adverse drug events: how can they be prevented?
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2006 Jul;5(4):489-93. doi: 10.1517/14740338.5.4.489.

引用本文的文献

2
Electronic medicine management systems in developing countries: A landscape review.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Sep;91(9):2507-2514. doi: 10.1002/bcp.70156. Epub 2025 Jul 1.
3
Electronic Transfusion Safety System: Characterization of Patient Safety Incidents.
Port J Public Health. 2025 Apr 15:1-17. doi: 10.1159/000543841.
4
Automated dispensing cabinets and the effect on omitted doses of ward stock medicines; can implementation reduce delays to first dose antimicrobials?
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2025 Feb 24;18:100583. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100583. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Introducing Unit Dose Dispensing in a University Hospital - Effects on Medication Safety and Dispensing Time.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2025 Mar 11;18:843-854. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S497454. eCollection 2025.
6
Effect of a closed-loop medication order executive system on safe medication administration at a tertiary hospital: a quasi-experimental study.
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2024 Oct 13;15:20420986241288421. doi: 10.1177/20420986241288421. eCollection 2024.
7
Comparing nursing medication rounds before and after implementation of automated dispensing cabinets: A time and motion study.
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Sep 7;16:100504. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100504. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
Prescription Precision: A Comprehensive Review of Intelligent Prescription Systems.
Curr Pharm Des. 2024;30(34):2671-2684. doi: 10.2174/0113816128321623240719104337.
9
Automated dispensing cabinets and their impact on the rate of omitted and delayed doses: A systematic review.
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 May 8;14:100451. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100451. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Introduction of Unit-Dose Care in the 1,125 Bed Teaching Hospital: Practical Experience and Time Saving on Wards.
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Mar 14;17:1137-1145. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S450203. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Qualitative evaluation of an electronic prescribing and administration system.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Aug;16(4):271-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019505.
3
The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Sep-Oct;12(5):505-16. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1700. Epub 2005 May 19.
4
Improving prescribing using a rule based prescribing system.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Jun;13(3):186-90. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.3.186.
5
Computerized physician order entry and medication errors in a pediatric critical care unit.
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 1):59-63. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.1.59.
6
Ethnographic study of incidence and severity of intravenous drug errors.
BMJ. 2003 Mar 29;326(7391):684. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7391.684.
7
Information technology and medication safety: what is the benefit?
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Sep;11(3):261-5. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.3.261.
8
Prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: their incidence and clinical significance.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Dec;11(4):340-4. doi: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.340.
9
Guided medication dosing for inpatients with renal insufficiency.
JAMA. 2001 Dec 12;286(22):2839-44. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.22.2839.
10
Validity and reliability of observational methods for studying medication administration errors.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2001 Jan 1;58(1):54-9. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/58.1.54.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验