Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Jan 1;171(1):24-6. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp379. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
Over the past decade, leading epidemiologists have noted the importance of social factors in studying and understanding the distribution and determinants of disease in human populations; but to what extent are epidemiologic studies integrating genetic information and other biologic variables with information about individual-level risk factors and group-level or societal factors related to the broader residential, behavioral, or cultural context? There remains a need to consider ways to integrate genetic information with social and contextual information in epidemiologic studies, partly to combat the overemphasis on the importance of genetic factors as determinants of disease in human populations. Even in genome-wide association studies of coronary heart disease and other common complex diseases, only a small proportion of heritability is explained by the genetic variants identified to date. It is possible that familial clustering due to genetic factors has been overestimated and that important environmental or social influences (acting alone or in combination with genetic variants) have been overlooked. The accompanying article by Bressler et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2010;171(1):14-23) highlights some of these important issues.
在过去的十年中,主要的流行病学家已经注意到社会因素在研究和理解人类群体中疾病的分布和决定因素方面的重要性;但是,流行病学研究在多大程度上将遗传信息和其他生物学变量与个体水平的危险因素以及与更广泛的居住、行为或文化背景相关的群体水平或社会因素信息相结合?仍然需要考虑如何将遗传信息与流行病学研究中的社会和背景信息相结合,部分是为了克服过分强调遗传因素作为人类群体中疾病决定因素的重要性。即使在针对冠心病和其他常见复杂疾病的全基因组关联研究中,迄今为止确定的遗传变异也只能解释一小部分可遗传性。由于遗传因素导致的家族聚集可能被高估了,而重要的环境或社会影响(单独或与遗传变异结合)可能被忽视了。Bressler 等人的随附文章(Am J Epidemiol. 2010;171(1):14-23)强调了其中的一些重要问题。