• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

职业性哮喘的筛查:一句警示之言。

Screening for occupational asthma: a word of caution.

作者信息

McNutt G M, Schlueter D P, Fink J N

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.

出版信息

J Occup Med. 1991 Jan;33(1):19-22. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199101000-00008.

DOI:10.1097/00043764-199101000-00008
PMID:1995797
Abstract

The diagnosis of occupational asthma may be difficult due to the complex mechanisms inducing the disorder. Identification of the offending agent after historical documentation may be difficult without bronchial challenge. The hallmark of asthma is bronchial hyperreactivity as detected by methacholine challenge, and this test could be considered as a screening test for asthma in the workplace. Four cases are presented that document changes in methacholine airway reactivity dependent on temporal association with exposure to the workplace or the specific offending agent. This indicates a need for a careful evaluation of symptoms relative to exposure in patients suspected for workplace asthma as well as serial determinations of methacholine response to detect potential variability in the airway reactivity.

摘要

由于引发职业性哮喘的机制复杂,其诊断可能存在困难。在没有支气管激发试验的情况下,依据病史记录来确定致病因素可能会有难度。哮喘的标志是通过乙酰甲胆碱激发试验检测到的支气管高反应性,该试验可被视为工作场所哮喘的一项筛查试验。本文介绍了4例病例,这些病例证明了乙酰甲胆碱气道反应性的变化取决于与工作场所暴露或特定致病因素的时间关联。这表明,对于疑似职业性哮喘的患者,需要仔细评估其与暴露相关的症状,并连续测定乙酰甲胆碱反应,以检测气道反应性的潜在变化。

相似文献

1
Screening for occupational asthma: a word of caution.职业性哮喘的筛查:一句警示之言。
J Occup Med. 1991 Jan;33(1):19-22. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199101000-00008.
2
Quantitative skin prick and bronchial provocation tests with platinum salt.铂盐的定量皮肤点刺试验和支气管激发试验。
Br J Ind Med. 1991 Dec;48(12):830-7. doi: 10.1136/oem.48.12.830.
3
Relation between occupational asthma case history, bronchial methacholine challenge, and specific challenge test in patients with suspected occupational asthma.疑似职业性哮喘患者的职业性哮喘病史、支气管乙酰甲胆碱激发试验和特异性激发试验之间的关系。
Am J Ind Med. 1998 Feb;33(2):114-22. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199802)33:2<114::aid-ajim3>3.0.co;2-y.
4
Diagnosis of flour-induced occupational asthma in a cross-sectional study.横断面研究中面粉诱发职业性哮喘的诊断
Respir Med. 2002 Apr;96(4):236-43. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2001.1259.
5
Irritant-induced asthma: clinical and functional aspects.刺激性物质诱发的哮喘:临床与功能方面
J Asthma. 2000 May;37(3):267-74. doi: 10.3109/02770900009055449.
6
Isocyanate-induced asthma: results of inhalation tests with TDI, MDI and methacholine.异氰酸酯诱发的哮喘:甲苯二异氰酸酯、二苯甲烷二异氰酸酯和乙酰甲胆碱吸入试验的结果
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1991;63(1):9-13. doi: 10.1007/BF00406191.
7
Bronchial responsiveness to adenosine-5'-monophosphate and methacholine as predictors for nasal symptoms due to newly introduced allergens. A follow-up study among laboratory animal workers and bakery apprentices.支气管对5'-单磷酸腺苷和乙酰甲胆碱的反应性作为新引入过敏原引起鼻部症状的预测指标。一项针对实验动物工作者和面包店学徒的随访研究。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2003 Jun;33(6):789-94. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2003.01677.x.
8
Interpretation of the "positive" methacholine challenge.“阳性”乙酰甲胆碱激发试验的解读
Am J Ind Med. 2008 Oct;51(10):769-81. doi: 10.1002/ajim.20631.
9
Bronchial responsiveness to ultrasonic "fog" in occupational asthma due to low molecular weight chemicals.低分子量化学物质所致职业性哮喘中支气管对超声“雾”的反应性
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1996 Nov;77(5):378-84. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63336-4.
10
[Absence of association of specific and nonspecific bronchial hyperreactivity in occupational asthma caused by platinum salts].[铂盐所致职业性哮喘中特异性与非特异性支气管高反应性的无关联]
Pneumologie. 1997 Apr;51(4):345-50.

引用本文的文献

1
A new risk of occupational disease: allergic asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis in persons working with beneficial arthropods.一种新的职业病风险:从事益虫工作的人员患过敏性哮喘和鼻结膜炎。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1996;68(2):133-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00381246.