Department of Psychology, Illinois College Jacksonville, IL 62650, USA.
Life Sci. 2010 Jan 30;86(5-6):158-69. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2009.11.019. Epub 2009 Dec 1.
The type 2 muscarinic receptor (M2R) differs from the other G-protein-coupled muscarinic receptor (type 4, or M4R) in tissue distribution and physiologic effects. We studied the impact of these receptors on sleep and arousal by using M2R and M4R knock-out (KO) mice.
M2R and M4R KO and genetically intact mice were compared in terms of normal patterns of sleep, responses to sleep loss, infectious challenge and acoustic startle, and acoustic prepulse inhibition of startle (PPI).
Under basal conditions, M2R and M4R KO mice do not differ from the background strain or each other in the amount or diurnal pattern of sleep, locomotor activity, and body temperature. After enforced sleep loss, M2R KO mice, in contrast to the other two strains, show no rebound in slow-wave sleep (SWS) time, although their SWS is consolidated, and they show a greater rebound in time spent in REMS (rapid-eye-movement sleep) and REMS consolidation. During influenza infection, M2R KO mice, as compared with the other strains, show marked hypothermia and a less robust increase in SWS. During Candida albicans infection, M2R KO mice show a greater increase in SWS and a greater inflammatory response than do the other strains. M2R KO mice also show greater acoustic startle amplitude than does the background strain, although PPI was not different across the 3 strains over a range of stimulus intensities.
Taken together, these findings support different roles for M2R and M4R in the modulation of sleep and arousal during homeostatic challenge.
与其他 G 蛋白偶联毒蕈碱受体(M4R)相比,M2R 在组织分布和生理效应上存在差异。我们通过使用 M2R 和 M4R 敲除(KO)小鼠研究了这些受体对睡眠和觉醒的影响。
在正常睡眠模式、睡眠剥夺反应、感染性挑战和听觉惊跳反应以及听觉惊跳反射(PPI)预脉冲抑制方面,比较了 M2R 和 M4R KO 和基因完整的小鼠。
在基础条件下,M2R 和 M4R KO 小鼠与背景品系或彼此之间在睡眠量、昼夜模式、运动活动和体温方面没有差异。在强制睡眠剥夺后,与其他两种品系相比,M2R KO 小鼠的慢波睡眠(SWS)时间没有反弹,尽管它们的 SWS 得到了巩固,并且 REM 睡眠时间和 REM 巩固时间的反弹更大。在流感感染期间,与其他品系相比,M2R KO 小鼠表现出明显的体温过低和 SWS 增加幅度较小。在白色念珠菌感染期间,与其他品系相比,M2R KO 小鼠的 SWS 增加幅度更大,炎症反应更强。与背景品系相比,M2R KO 小鼠的听觉惊跳幅度也更大,尽管在一系列刺激强度下,这 3 个品系的 PPI 没有差异。
总的来说,这些发现支持 M2R 和 M4R 在稳态挑战期间调节睡眠和觉醒方面的不同作用。