Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Qual Health Res. 2010 Apr;20(4):565-75. doi: 10.1177/1049732309354278. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
In this article, we aim to describe the practical aspects of research actions that should be taken into account when two methods--the think-aloud technique for data collection and protocol analysis as an analysis technique--are combined with research of decision making in acute clinical settings. These methods are rarely used together or written about in health care research. In addition, careful consideration of the pros and cons of study sampling, data collection, data management, and analysis techniques or approaches is still lacking when these methods are used in health care research. We discuss the background of the think-aloud technique and protocol analysis and review previous studies that have used these methods. The examples in the article are based on our study, in which we investigated the decision making of critical care experts. We find that the combination of the think-aloud technique and protocol analysis is applicable when investigating complex and overlapping decision-making processes and rapid, ad hoc decisions made by critical care experts.
在本文中,我们旨在描述在将两种方法(即出声思维技术用于数据收集和协议分析作为分析技术)与急性临床环境中的决策研究相结合时应考虑的实际问题。这些方法在医疗保健研究中很少一起使用或被描述。此外,当这些方法用于医疗保健研究时,对于研究抽样、数据收集、数据管理和分析技术或方法的优缺点的仔细考虑仍然缺乏。我们讨论了出声思维技术和协议分析的背景,并回顾了以前使用这些方法的研究。本文中的示例基于我们的研究,我们研究了重症监护专家的决策制定。我们发现,出声思维技术和协议分析的结合适用于调查复杂和重叠的决策过程以及重症监护专家做出的快速、临时决策。