Is a nonstented duct-to-mucosa anastomosis using the modified Kakita method a safe procedure?

OBJECTIVES

After standardization of the perioperative management of pancreaticoduodenectomy, we retrospectively compared results in nonstented pancreaticojejunostomy with external-stented pancreaticojejunostomy.

METHODS

The study population included 129 consecutive patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy between 2004 and 2008. The postoperative mortality and morbidity were compared between 51 patients with restrictive use of external stenting (group A) and 78 patients without external stenting (group B). The patient with a pancreatic duct of less than 3 mm in diameter was 31% in group A and 46% in group B.

RESULTS

There were no differences in postoperative morbidity and mortality between the 2 groups. Although the frequency of overall postoperative pancreatic fistula development was significantly higher in group B than in group A (44% vs 27%, P = 0.0004), there was no difference in grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula rate (group A: 5.9% vs group B: 14.1%). The length of in-hospital stay in group B was significantly shorter than group A (13 vs 24 days, P < 0.0001). There were no differences in postoperative morbidity and mortality between subgroups that were consisted of patients with small pancreatic duct diameter.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective single-center study showed that nonstented duct-to-mucosa anastomosis was a safe procedure and was associated with a shortened in-hospital stay.