• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成本效益:胆碱酯酶抑制剂和美金刚在血管性痴呆中的应用

Cost-effectiveness: cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in vascular dementia.

作者信息

Wong Camilla L, Bansback Nick, Lee Philip E, Anis Aslam H

机构信息

Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Neurol Sci. 2009 Nov;36(6):735-9. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100008350.

DOI:10.1017/s0317167100008350
PMID:19960752
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several randomized controlled trials of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in mild to moderate vascular dementia have demonstrated the efficacy of these treatments. However, given these drugs incur considerable cost, the economic argument for their use is less clear.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incremental cost-effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine for mild to moderate vascular dementia.

DESIGN

A decision analysis model using a 24-28 week time horizon was developed. Outcomes of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine and probabilities of adverse events were extracted from a systematic review. Costs of adverse events, medications, and physician visits were obtained from local estimates. Robustness was tested with probabilistic sensitivity analysis using a Monte Carlo simulation.

INTERVENTIONS

Donepezil 5 mg daily, donepezil 10 mg daily, galantamine 16-24 mg daily, rivastigmine flexible dosing up to 6 mg twice daily, or memantine 10 mg twice daily versus standard care.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) expressed as cost per unit decrease in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive (ADAS-cog) subscale.

RESULTS

Donepezil 10 mg daily was found to be the most cost-effective treatment with an ICER of $400.64 (95%CI, $281.10-$596.35) per unit decline in the ADAS-cog subscale. All other treatments were dominated by donepezil 10 mg, that is, more costly and less effective.

CONCLUSION

From a societal perspective, treatment with cholinesterase inhibitors or memantine was more effective but also more costly than standard care for mild to moderate vascular dementia. The donepezil 10 mg strategy was the most cost-effective and also dominated the other alternatives.

摘要

背景

多项关于胆碱酯酶抑制剂和美金刚用于轻至中度血管性痴呆的随机对照试验已证明了这些治疗方法的有效性。然而,鉴于这些药物成本高昂,其使用的经济学依据尚不明晰。

目的

确定胆碱酯酶抑制剂和美金刚用于轻至中度血管性痴呆的增量成本效果。

设计

开发了一个使用24 - 28周时间范围的决策分析模型。从一项系统评价中提取了胆碱酯酶抑制剂和美金刚的疗效以及不良事件的概率。不良事件、药物和医生诊疗的成本来自当地估计值。通过使用蒙特卡洛模拟的概率敏感性分析来测试稳健性。

干预措施

每日5毫克多奈哌齐、每日10毫克多奈哌齐、每日16 - 24毫克加兰他敏、每日两次灵活剂量最高达6毫克的卡巴拉汀,或每日两次10毫克美金刚与标准治疗进行对比。

主要结局指标

以阿尔茨海默病评估量表认知(ADAS - cog)子量表每单位下降的成本表示的增量成本效果比(ICER)。

结果

发现每日10毫克多奈哌齐是最具成本效益的治疗方法,ADAS - cog子量表每下降一个单位的ICER为400.64美元(95%CI,281.10美元 - 596.35美元)。所有其他治疗方法均被每日10毫克多奈哌齐所主导,即成本更高且效果更差。

结论

从社会角度来看,对于轻至中度血管性痴呆,胆碱酯酶抑制剂或美金刚治疗比标准治疗更有效,但成本也更高。每日10毫克多奈哌齐策略是最具成本效益的,并且也优于其他替代方案。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness: cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in vascular dementia.成本效益:胆碱酯酶抑制剂和美金刚在血管性痴呆中的应用
Can J Neurol Sci. 2009 Nov;36(6):735-9. doi: 10.1017/s0317167100008350.
2
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of donepezil, galantamine, rivastigmine and memantine for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (review of Technology Appraisal No. 111): a systematic review and economic model.多奈哌齐、加兰他敏、利伐斯的明和美金刚治疗阿尔茨海默病的有效性和成本效果(技术评估第 111 号回顾):系统评价和经济模型。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(21):1-470. doi: 10.3310/hta16210.
3
Efficacy and adverse effects of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine in vascular dementia: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.胆碱酯酶抑制剂和美金刚在血管性痴呆中的疗效及不良反应:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Lancet Neurol. 2007 Sep;6(9):782-92. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70195-3.
4
The clinical and cost-effectiveness of donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine and memantine for Alzheimer's disease.多奈哌齐、卡巴拉汀、加兰他敏和美金刚用于治疗阿尔茨海默病的临床疗效及成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jan;10(1):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-160. doi: 10.3310/hta10010.
5
Economic evaluation of treatment options in patients with Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses.阿尔茨海默病患者治疗方案的经济评价:成本效益分析的系统评价。
Drugs. 2012 Apr 16;72(6):789-802. doi: 10.2165/11631830-000000000-00000.
6
Evaluating the cost effectiveness of donepezil in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease in Germany using discrete event simulation.使用离散事件模拟评估多奈哌齐在德国治疗阿尔茨海默病的成本效益。
BMC Neurol. 2012 Feb 8;12:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-2.
7
Alzheimer's dementia: budget impact and cost-utility analysis of a combination treatment of a cholinesterase inhibitor and memantine in Switzerland.阿尔茨海默病痴呆:在瑞士,使用胆碱酯酶抑制剂与美金刚联合治疗的预算影响和成本-效用分析。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2012 Nov 21;142:w13676. doi: 10.4414/smw.2012.13676. eCollection 2012.
8
Evolution of the evidence on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and memantine for Alzheimer's disease: systematic review and economic model.阿尔茨海默病乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂和美金刚有效性和成本效益的证据演变:系统评价和经济模型。
Age Ageing. 2013 Jan;42(1):14-20. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afs165. Epub 2012 Nov 22.
9
10
Effectiveness of cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine for treating dementia: evidence review for a clinical practice guideline.胆碱酯酶抑制剂和美金刚治疗痴呆的有效性:临床实践指南的证据综述
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Mar 4;148(5):379-97. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-5-200803040-00009.

引用本文的文献

1
The appropriate use of neuroimaging in the diagnostic work-up of dementia: an economic literature review and cost-effectiveness analysis.神经影像学在痴呆诊断检查中的合理应用:一项经济学文献综述与成本效益分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2014 Feb 1;14(2):1-67. eCollection 2014.
2
Genetic testing in combination with preventive donepezil treatment for patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment: an exploratory economic evaluation of personalized medicine.遗传性检测联合多奈哌齐预防治疗遗忘型轻度认知障碍患者:个体化药物的经济学探索性评价。
Mol Diagn Ther. 2012 Dec;16(6):389-99. doi: 10.1007/s40291-012-0010-7.
3
Economic evaluation of treatment options in patients with Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses.
阿尔茨海默病患者治疗方案的经济评价:成本效益分析的系统评价。
Drugs. 2012 Apr 16;72(6):789-802. doi: 10.2165/11631830-000000000-00000.
4
Vascular cognitive impairment: disease mechanisms and therapeutic implications.血管性认知障碍:疾病机制与治疗意义。
Neurotherapeutics. 2011 Jul;8(3):361-73. doi: 10.1007/s13311-011-0047-z.