Jürgens Ralf, Cohen Jonathan, Cameron Edwin, Burris Scott, Clayton Michaela, Elliott Richard, Pearshouse Richard, Gathumbi Anne, Cupido Delme
HIV/AIDS, Health, Policy and Human Rights, Mille-Isles, Quebec, Canada.
Reprod Health Matters. 2009 Nov;17(34):163-72. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(09)34462-6.
Recent years have seen a push to apply criminal law to HIV exposure and transmission, often driven by the wish to respond to concerns about the ongoing rapid spread of HIV in many countries. Particularly in Africa, some groups have begun to advocate for criminalization in response to the serious phenomenon of women being infected with HIV through sexual violence or by partners who do not reveal their HIV diagnoses to them. While these issues must be urgently addressed, a closer analysis of the complex issues raised by criminalization of HIV exposure or transmission reveals that criminalization is unlikely to prevent new infections or reduce women's vulnerability to HIV. In fact, it may harm women rather than assist them, and have a negative impact on public health and human rights. This paper is a slightly revised version of a document originally released in December 2008 by a coalition of HIV, women's and human rights organizations. It provides ten reasons why criminalizing HIV exposure or transmission is generally an unjust and ineffective public policy. The obvious exception involves cases where individuals purposely or maliciously transmit HIV with the intent to harm others. In these rare cases, existing criminal laws - rather than new, HIV-specific laws - can and should be used.
近年来,出现了将刑法应用于艾滋病毒暴露与传播问题的趋势,这一趋势往往是受应对许多国家艾滋病毒持续快速传播问题的愿望所驱动。特别是在非洲,一些团体已开始倡导将其定罪,以应对妇女因性暴力或伴侣未向其透露艾滋病毒诊断情况而感染艾滋病毒这一严重现象。虽然这些问题必须紧急加以解决,但对艾滋病毒暴露或传播定罪所引发的复杂问题进行更深入分析后发现,定罪不太可能预防新的感染或降低妇女感染艾滋病毒的易感性。事实上,这可能会伤害妇女而非帮助她们,并且会对公共卫生和人权产生负面影响。本文是艾滋病毒、妇女和人权组织联盟于2008年12月最初发布的一份文件的略微修订版。它阐述了将艾滋病毒暴露或传播定罪为何通常是一项不公正且无效的公共政策的十个原因。明显的例外情况涉及个人故意或恶意传播艾滋病毒以伤害他人的案例。在这些罕见案例中,可以且应当适用现行刑法,而非新的、专门针对艾滋病毒的法律。