Suppr超能文献

使用全国代表性样本评估社交焦虑障碍亚型的有效性。

Assessing the validity of social anxiety disorder subtypes using a nationally representative sample.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

出版信息

J Anxiety Disord. 2010 Mar;24(2):244-9. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.11.003. Epub 2009 Nov 18.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine and validate social anxiety disorder subtypes using the nationally representative National Comorbidity Survey Replication (N=9282). Generalized and non-generalized subtypes were defined as fearing at least 8 (i.e., most) and fewer than 7 of 14 possible social situations, respectively, following the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV-TR). Results indicated that in those with social anxiety disorder, the odds of having comorbid major depression, a comorbid anxiety disorder, and suicidal ideation were significantly greater in the generalized subtype. However, differences were no longer significant when adjusting for the number of feared social situations. Results further indicated that the number of feared social situations was significantly associated with comorbid major depression, a comorbid anxiety disorder, and suicidal ideation. These findings call into question the validity of DSM-IV-defined subtypes and provide additional support for the notion that clinicians and researchers should consider viewing this disorder on a single continuum with greater number of feared situations associated with greater clinical severity.

摘要

本研究旨在使用具有全国代表性的国家共病调查复制品(N=9282)来检验和验证社交焦虑障碍亚型。广义和非广义亚型分别定义为至少害怕 14 种可能社交情境中的 8 种(即大多数)和少于 7 种。遵循《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(DSM-IV-TR)。结果表明,在患有社交焦虑障碍的患者中,患有共病重度抑郁症、共病焦虑症和自杀意念的几率在广义亚型中显著更高。然而,当调整害怕的社交情境数量时,差异不再显著。结果进一步表明,害怕的社交情境数量与共病重度抑郁症、共病焦虑症和自杀意念显著相关。这些发现对 DSM-IV 定义的亚型的有效性提出了质疑,并为以下观点提供了额外支持,即临床医生和研究人员应该考虑将这种障碍视为一个单一的连续体,与更多的害怕情境相关联,与更大的临床严重程度相关联。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验