Suppr超能文献

创伤的严重程度决定了对 PF4/肝素的免疫反应和肝素诱导的血小板减少症的发生频率。

The severity of trauma determines the immune response to PF4/heparin and the frequency of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

机构信息

Institut für Immunologie und Transfusionsmedizin, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität, Greifswald.

出版信息

Blood. 2010 Mar 4;115(9):1797-803. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-07-231506. Epub 2009 Nov 20.

Abstract

Heparin can induce heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). The combined effect of type of surgery (major vs minor) and heparin on this prothrombotic immune reaction to platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin was analyzed. In a randomized, double-blind study, trauma patients receiving low-molecular-weight (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) for thrombosis prophylaxis were assessed for PF4/heparin-antibody seroconversion, HIT, and thrombosis according to type of surgery. The risk for seroconversion was higher than major versus minor surgery odds ratio, 7.98 [95% confidence interval, 2.06-31.00], P = .003, controlled for potential confounders, as was the risk for HIT (2.2% [95% confidence interval, 0.3%-4.1%] vs 0.0%, P = .010). During LMWH compared with UFH thromboprophylaxis, HIT (1 of 298 vs 4 of 316; P = .370) and PF4/heparin seroconversion (1.7% vs 6.6%; P = .002) were less frequent, driven by differences in patients undergoing major surgery (incidence of HIT: LMWH 0.8% vs UFH 4.0%; P = .180; seroconversion rates: 4.0% vs 17.0%; P = .001). After minor surgery, no case of HIT occurred. The severity of trauma and the need for major surgery strongly influence the risk of an anti-PF4/heparin immune response, which is then increased by UFH. In major trauma certoparin may be safer than UFH because it induces HIT-antibody seroconversion, and the corresponding risk of HIT, less frequently.

摘要

肝素可诱发肝素诱导的血小板减少症(HIT)。本研究分析了手术类型(主要手术与小手术)和肝素对血小板因子 4(PF4)/肝素这种抗血小板反应的联合影响。在一项随机、双盲研究中,接受低分子肝素(LMWH)或未分级肝素(UFH)预防血栓形成的创伤患者根据手术类型评估 PF4/肝素抗体血清转化率、HIT 和血栓形成。与小手术相比,大手术的血清转化率更高(比值比 7.98,95%置信区间 2.06-31.00,P=0.003),控制了潜在混杂因素,HIT 的风险也更高(2.2%[95%置信区间 0.3%-4.1%] vs 0.0%,P=0.010)。与 UFH 相比,LMWH 用于预防血栓形成时,HIT(298 例中有 1 例 vs 316 例中有 4 例;P=0.370)和 PF4/肝素抗体血清转化率(1.7% vs 6.6%;P=0.002)发生率更低,这主要是由于大手术患者的差异(HIT 发生率:LMWH 0.8% vs UFH 4.0%;P=0.180;血清转化率:4.0% vs 17.0%;P=0.001)。小手术后未发生 HIT。创伤严重程度和大手术的需要强烈影响抗 PF4/肝素免疫反应的风险,UFH 则增加了这种风险。在严重创伤中,依诺肝素可能比 UFH 更安全,因为它诱导 PF4/肝素抗体血清转化率和相应的 HIT 风险更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验