Cardiology Service, University Hospital of Geneva, 23, Micheli-du-Crest, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Europace. 2010 Mar;12(3):389-94. doi: 10.1093/europace/eup401. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
The effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) has not been well studied. Furthermore, it is unclear whether baseline RVEF influences response to CRT. To evaluate the acute and chronic effects of CRT on right ventricular systolic function, and to investigate whether baseline RVEF impacts response to CRT.
Forty-four patients with a standard indication for CRT underwent radionuclide angiography at baseline and after at least 6 months' follow-up for measuring RVEF, right ventricular synchrony (using phase analysis), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). In addition, NYHA functional class and 6-min walking distance (6MWD) were evaluated. There were no significant acute changes in RVEF with CRT. After a mean follow-up of 9 +/- 5 months, RVEF was slightly improved (by 1.9 +/- 5.0% in absolute terms, P = 0.016), and to a lesser extent than LVEF (5.1 +/- 9.0%, P = 0.009 compared with RVEF). Right ventricular dyssynchrony was significantly improved at follow-up (P = 0.016). Patients with a baseline RVEF < or = 0.35 (n = 19) were less likely to improve in NYHA class (P = 0.016), and also tended to improve less in 6MWD and LVEF (P < 0.06).
Cardiac resynchronization therapy has no acute effect on RVEF, and only slightly improves RVEF at follow-up. Patients with reduced RVEF at baseline were less likely to respond to CRT, indicating that right ventricular systolic dysfunction may play a role in patient selection.
心脏再同步治疗(CRT)对右心室射血分数(RVEF)的影响尚未得到很好的研究。此外,基线 RVEF 是否影响 CRT 的反应尚不清楚。评估 CRT 对右心室收缩功能的急性和慢性影响,并探讨基线 RVEF 是否影响对 CRT 的反应。
44 例符合 CRT 标准适应证的患者在基线时和至少 6 个月的随访时进行放射性核素血管造影术,以测量 RVEF、右心室同步性(使用相位分析)和左心室射血分数(LVEF)。此外,还评估了纽约心脏协会(NYHA)功能分级和 6 分钟步行距离(6MWD)。CRT 后 RVEF 无明显急性变化。平均随访 9±5 个月后,RVEF 略有改善(绝对值增加 1.9±5.0%,P=0.016),改善程度小于 LVEF(5.1±9.0%,P=0.009 与 RVEF 相比)。右心室不同步在随访时明显改善(P=0.016)。基线 RVEF≤0.35(n=19)的患者在 NYHA 分级改善方面不太可能(P=0.016),在 6MWD 和 LVEF 方面也倾向于改善较少(P<0.06)。
心脏再同步治疗对 RVEF 无急性作用,仅在随访时轻度改善 RVEF。基线 RVEF 降低的患者对 CRT 的反应性较低,表明右心室收缩功能障碍可能在患者选择中起作用。