Research Division, United Heart & Vascular Clinic, 225 N. Smith Avenue, #400, St Paul, MN, USA.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2014 Nov;16(11):1199-205. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.143. Epub 2014 Jul 31.
Right ventricular pacing (RVp) results in an electrocardiographic left bundle branch block pattern and can lead to heart failure. This study aimed to evaluate echocardiographic and clinical outcomes of heart failure patients with RVp upgraded to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), as they are frequently excluded from multicentre studies.
This observational study assessed 655 consecutive patients with QRS ≥120 ms and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%. There were 465 patients without significant previous RVp and 190 with RVp >40%. Echocardiograms were analysed pre-CRT and ∼ 1 year post-CRT. Death and heart failure hospitalizations were analysed using Cox regression, adjusted for baseline characteristics. The RVp patients had smaller end-systolic volume (P = 0.002), were older (P < 0.001), and had more atrial fibrillation (P < 0.001) pre-CRT. Ejection fraction and proportion of ischaemic aetiology were similar. One year following CRT implantation the ejection fraction response was greater in the RVp group (8.3 ± 9 vs. 5.8 ± 9 units, P = 0.005). The RVp patients had an adjusted 33% lower risk of death or heart failure hospitalization [hazard ratio (HR) 0.67 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-0.89, P = 0.005], while tending to have an adjusted lower risk of death (HR 0.73 95% CI 0.53-1.01, P = 0.055).
Despite similar ejection fraction pre-CRT, patients upgraded to CRT with previous RVp have smaller end-systolic volume and respond to CRT at least as well as, if not better than, other wide QRS heart failure patients. A greater improvement in ejection fraction and a lower risk of death or heart failure hospitalization when adjusted for baseline characteristics were seen in those with previous RVp.
右心室起搏(RVp)导致心电图左束支传导阻滞模式,并可能导致心力衰竭。本研究旨在评估因 RVp 升级为心脏再同步治疗(CRT)而被排除在多中心研究之外的心力衰竭患者的超声心动图和临床结局。
本观察性研究评估了 655 例 QRS≥120ms 和左心室射血分数≤35%的连续患者。其中 465 例无明显既往 RVp,190 例有 RVp>40%。在 CRT 前和 CRT 后约 1 年分析超声心动图。使用 Cox 回归分析死亡和心力衰竭住院情况,调整基线特征。RVp 患者 CRT 前左室收缩末期容积较小(P=0.002),年龄较大(P<0.001),心房颤动更多(P<0.001)。射血分数和缺血病因比例相似。CRT 植入后 1 年,RVp 组射血分数反应更大(8.3±9 比 5.8±9 单位,P=0.005)。RVp 患者死亡或心力衰竭住院风险调整后降低 33%(风险比[HR]0.67,95%置信区间[CI]0.51-0.89,P=0.005),而死亡风险调整后有降低趋势(HR 0.73,95%CI 0.53-1.01,P=0.055)。
尽管 CRT 前射血分数相似,但升级为 CRT 的既往 RVp 患者左室收缩末期容积较小,对 CRT 的反应至少与其他宽 QRS 心力衰竭患者一样好,如果不是更好的话。在调整基线特征后,既往 RVp 患者的射血分数改善更大,死亡或心力衰竭住院风险降低。