• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西生物伦理学家与国家卫生系统中的普遍性和完整性原则。

Brazilian bioethicists and the principles of universality and integrality in the National Health System.

机构信息

Departamento de Prática de Saúde Pública, Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Dr. Arnaldo 715, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Rev Saude Publica. 2009 Dec;43(6):1054-8. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102009005000067. Epub 2009 Dec 4.

DOI:10.1590/s0034-89102009005000067
PMID:19967253
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To understand the meanings attributed by Brazilian bioethicists to the principles of universality and integrality in the Brazilian public health system.

METHODOLOGICAL PROCEDURES

A qualitative and exploratory research was carried out with 20 Bioethics professors in the field of public health from July 2007 to July 2008. Participants were directors and former directors of the Brazilian Bioethics Society and of its local departments. Semi-structured interviews with open questions were conducted and followed by content analysis.

ANALYSIS OF RESULTS

With regard to the principle of the universal access of Brazilians to the public system, most of interviewees were in favor of maintaining it. However, there were divergences of the principle of integrality, with the majority being inclined to restrict it.

CONCLUSIONS

Bioethicists hold a plurality of moral values and difficulties to morally decide on what would be a fair health system.

摘要

目的

了解巴西生物伦理学家对巴西公共卫生系统中普遍性和整体性原则的理解。

方法

2007 年 7 月至 2008 年 7 月,对公共卫生领域的 20 名生物伦理学家进行了定性和探索性研究。参与者是巴西生物伦理学会及其地方部门的主任和前任主任。采用开放式半结构访谈进行访谈,并进行内容分析。

分析结果

关于巴西人普遍获得公共系统的原则,大多数受访者赞成维持该原则。然而,整体性原则存在分歧,大多数人倾向于限制该原则。

结论

生物伦理学家持有多种道德价值观,难以在道德上决定什么是公平的卫生系统。

相似文献

1
Brazilian bioethicists and the principles of universality and integrality in the National Health System.巴西生物伦理学家与国家卫生系统中的普遍性和完整性原则。
Rev Saude Publica. 2009 Dec;43(6):1054-8. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102009005000067. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
2
[Equity in the health system according to Brazilian bioethicists].[巴西生物伦理学家眼中的卫生系统公平性]
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2010 Jan-Feb;56(1):47-50. doi: 10.1590/s0104-42302010000100015.
3
[Bioethics and Brazilian health policies].[生物伦理学与巴西卫生政策]
J Int Bioethique. 2008 Mar-Jun;19(1-2):121-8, 199. doi: 10.3917/jib.191.0121.
4
Integrality of the therapeutic and pharmaceutical care: a necessary debate.治疗与药学护理的整体性:一场必要的辩论。
Rev Saude Publica. 2017 Dec 11;51:126. doi: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051000185.
5
[Managing comprehensive care: a case study in a health district in Bahia State, Brazil].[管理综合护理:巴西巴伊亚州一个健康区的案例研究]
Cad Saude Publica. 2016 Mar;32(3):e00172214. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00172214. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
6
Integrality in cervical cancer care: evaluation of access.宫颈癌护理的完整性:可及性评估
Rev Saude Publica. 2014 Apr;48(2):240-8. doi: 10.1590/s0034-8910.2014048004852.
7
[Organization of the health system from the perspective of home care professionals].[从家庭护理专业人员角度看卫生系统的组织]
Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2013 Jun;34(2):111-7. doi: 10.1590/s1983-14472013000200014.
8
Integrality in the population's health care programs.
Cien Saude Colet. 2007 Mar-Apr;12(2):343-9. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232007000200010.
9
Brazilian Health Surveillance: reflections and contribution to the debate of the First National Conference on Health Surveillance.巴西卫生监督:对第一次全国卫生监督会议辩论的思考与贡献
Cien Saude Colet. 2017 Oct;22(10):3137-3148. doi: 10.1590/1413-812320172210.18092017.
10
Austerity and the future of the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS): health in perspective.紧缩政策与巴西统一卫生系统(SUS)的未来:透视健康
Health Promot Int. 2019 Mar 1;34(Supplement_1):i20-i27. doi: 10.1093/heapro/day075.

引用本文的文献

1
Integrality of the therapeutic and pharmaceutical care: a necessary debate.治疗与药学护理的整体性:一场必要的辩论。
Rev Saude Publica. 2017 Dec 11;51:126. doi: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051000185.