Ryan J M, Cooper G J, Haywood I R, Milner S M
Royal College of Surgeons of England, London.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1991 Jan;73(1):13-20.
Most papers appearing in the surgical literature dealing with wound ballistics concern themselves with wound management in the civilian setting. The pathophysiology of modern war wounds is contrasted with ballistic wounds commonly encountered in peacetime, but it should be noted that even in peacetime the modern terrorist may have access to sophisticated military weaponry, and that patients injured by them may fall within the catchment area of any civilian hospital. Management problems associated with both wound types are highlighted; areas of controversy are discussed. The orthodox military surgical approach to ballistic wounds is expounded and defended.
大多数发表在外科文献中关于伤口弹道学的论文关注的是平民环境中的伤口处理。现代战争伤口的病理生理学与和平时期常见的弹道伤形成对比，但应注意，即使在和平时期，现代恐怖分子也可能获得先进的军事武器，而且受这些武器伤害的患者可能在任何一家平民医院的收治范围内。文中强调了与这两种伤口类型相关的处理问题；讨论了存在争议的领域。阐述并捍卫了处理弹道伤的传统军事外科方法。
