Department of Health Care Administration, College of Health Science, Asia University, 500, Lioufeng Road, Wufeng, Taichung County 41354, Taiwan.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Dec 7;9:223. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-223.
This study analyzed the likelihood of less-urgent emergency department (ED) visits among type 2 diabetic patients receiving care under a diabetes disease management (DM) program offered by the Louisiana State University Health Care Services Division (LSU HCSD).
All ED and outpatient clinic visits made by 6,412 type 2 diabetic patients from 1999 to 2006 were extracted from the LSU HCSD Disease Management (DM) Evaluation Database. Patient ED visits were classified as either urgent or less-urgent, and the likelihood of a less-urgent ED visit was compared with outpatient clinic visits using the Generalized Estimating Equation methodology for binary response to time-dependent variables.
Patients who adhered to regular clinic visit schedules dictated by the DM program were less likely to use the ED for less urgent care with odds ratio of 0.1585. Insured patients had 1.13 to 1.70 greater odds of a less-urgent ED visit than those who were uninsured. Patients with better-managed glycated hemoglobin (A1c or HbA1c) levels were 82 times less likely to use less-urgent ED visits. Furthermore, being older, Caucasian, or a longer participant in the DM program had a modestly lower likelihood of less-urgent ED visits. The patient's Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), gender, prior hospitalization, and the admitting facility showed no effect.
Patients adhering to the DM visit guidelines were less likely to use the ED for less-urgent problems. Maintaining normal A1c levels for their diabetes also has the positive impact to reduce less-urgent ED usages. It suggests that successful DM programs may reduce inappropriate ED use. In contrast to expectations, uninsured patients were less likely to use the ED for less-urgent care. Patients in the DM program with Medicaid coverage were 1.3 times more likely to seek care in the ED for non-emergencies while commercially insured patients were nearly 1.7 times more likely to do so. Further research to understand inappropriate ED use among insured patients is needed. We suggest providing visit reminders, a call centre, or case managers to reduce the likelihood of less-urgent ED visit use among DM patients. By reducing the likelihood of unnecessary ED visits, successful DM programs can improve patient care.
本研究分析了在路易斯安那州立大学医疗保健服务部(LSU HCSD)提供的糖尿病疾病管理(DM)计划下接受治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者前往急诊部(ED)就诊的可能性较低。
从 LSU HCSD 疾病管理(DM)评估数据库中提取了 1999 年至 2006 年间 6412 名 2 型糖尿病患者的所有 ED 和门诊就诊记录。患者 ED 就诊被分为紧急和非紧急,使用广义估计方程方法对时间相关变量的二项反应比较了非紧急 ED 就诊的可能性。
遵守 DM 计划规定的定期门诊就诊时间表的患者使用 ED 进行非紧急护理的可能性较小,优势比为 0.1585。有保险的患者比没有保险的患者更有可能进行非紧急 ED 就诊,其优势比为 1.13 至 1.70。糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平管理较好的患者使用非紧急 ED 就诊的可能性降低 82 倍。此外,年龄较大、白种人或更长时间参加 DM 计划的患者使用非紧急 ED 就诊的可能性略低。患者的 Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)、性别、既往住院和收治机构均无影响。
遵守 DM 就诊指南的患者更不可能因非紧急问题使用 ED。保持正常的 HbA1c 水平也对减少非紧急 ED 使用有积极影响。这表明成功的 DM 计划可能会减少不必要的 ED 使用。与预期相反,没有保险的患者因非紧急问题使用 ED 的可能性较低。参加 DM 计划且有医疗补助覆盖的患者因非紧急问题在 ED 就诊的可能性比商业保险患者高 1.3 倍,几乎是商业保险患者的 1.7 倍。需要进一步研究以了解有保险患者的不当 ED 使用情况。我们建议提供就诊提醒、呼叫中心或个案经理,以降低 DM 患者因非紧急问题使用 ED 的可能性。通过降低不必要的 ED 就诊的可能性,成功的 DM 计划可以改善患者的护理。