Department of Medicine, Montreal Heart Institute and Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Heart Rhythm. 2009 Oct;6(10):1465-72. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2009.07.034. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
There are many similarities between atrial effects of atrial tachycardia remodeling (ATR) and vagal nerve stimulation (VS): both promote atrial fibrillation (AF), reduce atrial effective refractory period (AERP) and AERP rate accommodation, enhance AERP heterogeneity, and increase inward-rectifier K+ current.
This study sought to compare the consequences of ATR and VS at similar levels of AERP abbreviation in dogs.
ATR dogs (n = 6) were subjected to 7-day atrial tachypacing at 400 beats/min, with radiofrequency-induced atrioventricular block and ventricular demand pacing (80 beats/min) to control ventricular response. VS was applied in 6 matched dogs with stimulation parameters selected to produce similar mean AERP values to ATR dogs.
ATR and VS produced similarly short AERPs (79 +/- 12 and 80 +/- 12 ms, respectively), AERP rate-adaptation loss, and AERP heterogeneity increases. Although both ATR and VS increased AF duration, VS was significantly more effective in AF promotion, with mean AF duration of 992 +/- 134 seconds, versus 440 +/- 240 seconds (P <.05) under ATR. The greater AF-promoting effect of VS was associated with greater mean dominant frequency values during AF (11.7 +/- 1.8 versus 10.0 +/- 1.3 Hz ATR, P <.05). VS greatly enhanced the spatial dominant frequency variability, increasing the coefficient of variation to 15.2 +/- 1.9 Hz, versus 8.9 +/- 1.5 Hz for ATR (P <.05), primarily by increasing the per-dog maximum dominant frequency (15.4 +/- 0.6 Hz versus 12.5 +/- 0.6 for ATR, P <.01).
For matched AERP values, VS promotes AF more strongly than ATR. Despite similar AERP changes, VS produces considerably greater increases in dominant frequencies, particularly maximum values, consistent with previous suggestions that inward-rectifier K+ current enhancement is particularly effective at accelerating and stabilizing spiral wave rotors that maintain AF.
心房心动过速重构(ATR)和迷走神经刺激(VS)的心房效应有许多相似之处:两者均可促进心房颤动(AF),降低心房有效不应期(AERP)和 AERP 率适应性,增强 AERP 异质性,并增加内向整流钾电流。
本研究旨在比较 ATR 和 VS 在类似 AERP 缩短水平下对狗的影响。
ATR 狗(n = 6)接受 7 天 400 次/分的心房超速起搏,射频诱导房室阻滞和心室按需起搏(80 次/分)以控制心室反应。在 6 只匹配的狗中应用 VS,刺激参数选择为产生与 ATR 狗相似的平均 AERP 值。
ATR 和 VS 产生相似的短 AERP(分别为 79 ± 12 和 80 ± 12 ms)、AERP 率适应性丧失和 AERP 异质性增加。尽管 ATR 和 VS 均增加 AF 持续时间,但 VS 在促进 AF 方面更为有效,AF 持续时间平均为 992 ± 134 秒,而 ATR 时为 440 ± 240 秒(P <.05)。VS 促进 AF 的效果更大,与 AF 期间平均主导频率值更大有关(11.7 ± 1.8 对 10.0 ± 1.3 Hz ATR,P <.05)。VS 大大增强了空间主导频率变异性,使变异系数增加到 15.2 ± 1.9 Hz,而 ATR 为 8.9 ± 1.5 Hz(P <.05),主要是通过增加每只狗的最大主导频率(15.4 ± 0.6 Hz 对 12.5 ± 0.6 Hz ATR,P <.01)。
对于匹配的 AERP 值,VS 促进 AF 的作用强于 ATR。尽管 AERP 变化相似,但 VS 产生的主导频率增加幅度大得多,尤其是最大值,这与之前的观点一致,即内向整流钾电流增强特别有效地加速和稳定维持 AF 的螺旋波转子。