Department of Urology, University of Turin, Molinette Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Eur Urol. 2010 Mar;57(3):410-29. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.023. Epub 2009 Nov 13.
Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) remains the most effective intravesical treatment for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC), but the clinical development of BCG has been accompanied by controversy. Recent publications have called into question a number of aspects related to its use.
To review the current clinical role of BCG in NMIBC, focusing on efficacy and tolerability as primary objectives and on strategies to predict response and decrease toxicity as secondary objectives.
We performed a systematic literature search of published articles in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases for the period from 1976 to November 2008. The following "free text" combination was used in the first instance: "BCG and intravesical and bladder cancer." Further free text searches were performed by separately adding the following keywords to the combination "BCG and intravesical": survival, progression, recurrence, maintenance, dosing, toxicity, tolerability, side effects, prognostic factors.
BCG is the most effective intravesical agent for preventing NMIBC recurrence, but its role in disease progression remains controversial. In intermediate-risk NMIBC, the superiority of BCG over chemotherapy is well established for disease recurrence but not for progression and needs to be balanced against higher toxicity. With regard to high-risk NMIBC, there is sufficient evidence to show that BCG is the most effective treatment of carcinoma in situ for ablation, disease-free interval, and progression, but the impact of BCG on the natural history of T1G3 tumors relies on a low level of evidence. Maintenance remains crucial for efficacy. The dose can be safely and effectively reduced to decrease its toxicity, which is slightly greater than chemotherapy.
BCG should still be viewed as the most effective intravesical agent, but its role in the progression of papillary tumors needs to be clarified. BCG remains an alternative to intravesical chemotherapy in intermediate-risk NMIBC, and it is recommended as the standard of care for high-risk NMIBC.
卡介苗(BCG)仍然是治疗非肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)最有效的膀胱内治疗方法,但 BCG 的临床应用一直存在争议。最近的一些出版物对其应用的多个方面提出了质疑。
回顾 BCG 在 NMIBC 中的临床应用,主要以疗效和耐受性为主要目标,并以预测反应和降低毒性的策略为次要目标。
我们对从 1976 年到 2008 年 11 月发表在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 中央对照试验注册数据库的已发表文章进行了系统的文献检索。首次使用了以下“自由文本”组合:“BCG 和膀胱内和膀胱癌”。通过单独向“BCG 和膀胱内”的组合中添加以下关键字,进一步进行了自由文本搜索:生存、进展、复发、维持、剂量、毒性、耐受性、副作用、预后因素。
BCG 是预防 NMIBC 复发最有效的膀胱内药物,但在疾病进展方面的作用仍存在争议。在中危 NMIBC 中,BCG 在疾病复发方面优于化疗已得到充分证实,但在进展方面则不然,并且需要与更高的毒性相平衡。对于高危 NMIBC,有足够的证据表明 BCG 是治疗原位癌的最有效方法,可用于消融、无病间隔和进展,但 BCG 对 T1G3 肿瘤自然史的影响依赖于低水平的证据。维持对于疗效至关重要。可以安全有效地减少剂量以降低其毒性,其毒性略高于化疗。
BCG 仍应被视为最有效的膀胱内药物,但仍需明确其在乳头状肿瘤进展中的作用。BCG 仍然是中危 NMIBC 膀胱内化疗的替代方法,建议将其作为高危 NMIBC 的标准治疗方法。