• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

噻托溴铵 5 微克通过 Respimat 和 18 微克通过 HandiHaler;在日本 COPD 患者中的疗效和安全性。

Tiotropium 5microg via Respimat and 18microg via HandiHaler; efficacy and safety in Japanese COPD patients.

机构信息

Third Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Kimiidera, Wakayama, Japan.

出版信息

Respir Med. 2010 Feb;104(2):228-36. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.11.011. Epub 2009 Dec 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.rmed.2009.11.011
PMID:19969446
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of tiotropium inhaled via Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler, a multidose propellant-free inhaler and HandiHaler, a single-dose dry powder inhaler, in a phase 2 study of Japanese COPD patients.

METHODS

Patients with FEV(1)<or=70% predicted, FEV(1)/FVC<or=70% and a smoking history of >10 pack-years received tiotropium once daily via Respimat (5microg) and HandiHaler (18microg) for 4 weeks each in a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, two-way crossover study. Lung function, adverse events, pharmacokinetics and safety were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 184 patients screened, 134 were evaluable. The trough FEV(1) response on Day 29 showed Respimat to be non-inferior to HandiHaler (mean treatment difference, 0.008L; 95% CI, -0.009 to +0.024L; p<0.001). Peak and average FEV(1) and FVC responses on Day 1 and Day 29 were very similar for the two treatments. Tiotropium plasma levels and excretion kinetics showed a similar profile of systemic exposure for the two formulations of tiotropium. Adverse events were reported by similar numbers of patients on each treatment, i.e. 27.9 and 30.6% in the Respimat and HandiHaler groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In Japanese patients with COPD, tiotropium Respimat 5microg and tiotropium HandiHaler 18microg showed a similar profile of efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics.

摘要

背景和目的

比较噻托溴铵经 Respimat 软雾吸入器(一种多剂量无推进剂吸入器)和 HandiHaler(一种单剂量干粉吸入器)给药,在日本 COPD 患者的 2 期研究中的疗效和安全性。

方法

FEV1<or=70%预计值、FEV1/FVC<or=70%和吸烟史>10 包年的患者接受噻托溴铵每日一次治疗,分别通过 Respimat(5μg)和 HandiHaler(18μg)给药,持续 4 周,采用随机、双盲、双模拟、两交叉设计研究。评估肺功能、不良事件、药代动力学和安全性。

结果

在筛选的 184 例患者中,有 134 例可评估。第 29 天的谷值 FEV1 反应显示 Respimat 与 HandiHaler 相当(平均治疗差异,0.008L;95%CI,-0.009 至+0.024L;p<0.001)。第 1 天和第 29 天的峰值和平均 FEV1 和 FVC 反应在两种治疗方法中非常相似。两种噻托溴铵制剂的血浆水平和排泄动力学表现出相似的全身暴露特征。两种治疗方法报告的不良事件数量相似,即 Respimat 和 HandiHaler 组分别为 27.9%和 30.6%。

结论

在日本 COPD 患者中,噻托溴铵 Respimat 5μg 和噻托溴铵 HandiHaler 18μg 具有相似的疗效、安全性和药代动力学特征。

相似文献

1
Tiotropium 5microg via Respimat and 18microg via HandiHaler; efficacy and safety in Japanese COPD patients.噻托溴铵 5 微克通过 Respimat 和 18 微克通过 HandiHaler;在日本 COPD 患者中的疗效和安全性。
Respir Med. 2010 Feb;104(2):228-36. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.11.011. Epub 2009 Dec 6.
2
The efficacy of tiotropium administered via Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler or HandiHaler in COPD patients.通过Respimat软雾吸入器或HandiHaler吸入噻托溴铵在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中的疗效。
Respir Med. 2009 Jan;103(1):22-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Nov 20.
3
A randomized study of tiotropium Respimat Soft Mist inhaler vs. ipratropium pMDI in COPD.噻托溴铵软雾吸入剂与异丙托溴铵定量气雾剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的随机对照研究
Respir Med. 2008 Jan;102(1):32-41. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.08.009. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
4
Tiotropium administered by a pressurized metered dose inhaler (pMDI) and spacer produces a similar bronchodilator response as that administered by a Rotahaler in adult subjects with stable moderate-to-severe COPD.对于患有稳定的中重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的成年受试者,使用压力定量吸入器(pMDI)和储雾罐给药的噻托溴铵产生的支气管扩张反应与使用旋转式吸入器给药的相似。
Respir Med. 2007 Dec;101(12):2464-71. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.07.006. Epub 2007 Aug 24.
5
Tiotropium Respimat inhaler and the risk of death in COPD.噻托溴铵 Respimat 吸入器与 COPD 患者的死亡风险。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 17;369(16):1491-501. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1303342. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
6
[Comparison of tiotropium inhalation capsules and ipratropium metered dose inhaler in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, efficacy and safety study in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].噻托溴铵吸入胶囊与异丙托溴铵定量气雾剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病的随机、双盲、双模拟疗效和安全性研究比较
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2006 Jun;29(6):363-7.
7
Effect of switching tiotropium HandiHaler® to Respimat® Soft Mist™ Inhaler in patients with COPD: the difference of adverse events and usability between inhaler devices.在 COPD 患者中,从噻托溴铵 HandiHaler®切换至 Respimat® Soft Mist™吸入器的效果:两种吸入装置不良事件和可用性的差异。
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2013 Feb;26(1):41-5. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2011.0941. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
8
A dose-ranging study of indacaterol in obstructive airways disease, with a tiotropium comparison.茚达特罗在阻塞性气道疾病中的剂量范围研究,并与噻托溴铵进行比较。
Respir Med. 2008 Jul;102(7):1033-44. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2008.02.001. Epub 2008 May 13.
9
Tiotropium improves lung function in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma: a randomized controlled trial.噻托溴铵改善重度未控制哮喘患者的肺功能:一项随机对照试验。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Aug;128(2):308-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.04.039. Epub 2011 Jun 2.
10
Efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide/albuterol delivered via Respimat inhaler versus MDI.异丙托溴铵/沙丁胺醇经 Respimat 吸入器与 MDI 给药的疗效和安全性。
Respir Med. 2010 Aug;104(8):1179-88. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2010.01.017. Epub 2010 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler: Implications of Drug Delivery Characteristics for Patients.瑞普米特软雾吸入器:药物输送特性对患者的影响。
Clin Drug Investig. 2019 Nov;39(11):1021-1030. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00835-z.
2
Fixed-Dose Combinations of Long-Acting Bronchodilators for the Management of COPD: Global and Asian Perspectives.长效支气管扩张剂固定剂量组合在 COPD 管理中的应用:全球和亚洲视角。
Adv Ther. 2019 Mar;36(3):495-519. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-0893-3. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
3
Inhaled bronchodilators and acute myocardial infarction: a nested case-control study.
吸入性支气管扩张剂与急性心肌梗死:巢式病例对照研究。
Sci Rep. 2017 Dec 20;7(1):17915. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17890-1.
4
Comparative Efficacy of Once-Daily Umeclidinium/Vilanterol and Tiotropium/Olodaterol Therapy in Symptomatic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Study.每日一次乌美溴铵/维兰特罗与噻托溴铵/奥达特罗治疗有症状慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效比较:一项随机研究。
Adv Ther. 2017 Nov;34(11):2518-2533. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0626-4. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
5
Tiotropium formulations and safety: a network meta-analysis.噻托溴铵制剂与安全性:一项网状Meta分析。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2017 Jan;8(1):17-30. doi: 10.1177/2042098616667304. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
6
Bronchodilator efficacy of 18 μg once-daily tiotropium inhalation via Discair versus HandiHaler in adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, open-label, Phase IV trial.对于慢性阻塞性肺疾病成人患者,通过Diskair与HandiHaler每日一次吸入18μg噻托溴铵的支气管扩张疗效:随机、活性药物对照、平行组、开放标签的IV期试验。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2016 Nov 22;11:2859-2867. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S119114. eCollection 2016.
7
A systematic review of comparative studies of tiotropium Respimat® and tiotropium HandiHaler® in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: does inhaler choice matter?噻托溴铵软雾吸入剂(Respimat®)与噻托溴铵干粉吸入器(HandiHaler®)用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的比较研究的系统评价:吸入器的选择重要吗?
BMC Pulm Med. 2016 Oct 11;16(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12890-016-0291-4.
8
Long-term safety of tiotropium delivered by Respimat SoftMist™ Inhaler: patient selection and special considerations.Respimat软雾™吸入器递送的噻托溴铵的长期安全性:患者选择及特殊考量
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016 Sep 21;12:1433-1444. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S109011. eCollection 2016.
9
Tiotropium Respimat(®) Versus HandiHaler(®): Comparison of Bronchodilator Efficacy of Various Doses in Clinical Trials.噻托溴铵软雾吸入剂(Respimat®)与都保(HandiHaler®):不同剂量支气管扩张剂在临床试验中的疗效比较
Adv Ther. 2016 May;33(5):786-93. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0322-9. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
10
Tiotropium Bromide in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Bronchial Asthma.噻托溴铵在慢性阻塞性肺疾病和支气管哮喘中的应用
J Clin Med Res. 2015 Nov;7(11):831-9. doi: 10.14740/jocmr2305w. Epub 2015 Sep 25.