The Amsterdam School of Communications Research, ASCoR, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Br J Dev Psychol. 2009 Mar;27(Pt 1):105-21. doi: 10.1348/026151008x334719.
The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of various types of parental communication in modifying children's responses to television food advertising. In a combined diary-survey study among 234 parents of 4- to 12-year-old children, I investigated how different styles of advertising mediation (active vs. restrictive) and consumer communication (concept-oriented vs. socio-oriented) moderated the relation between children's advertising exposure and their consumption of advertised energy-dense food products. Interaction analysis in regression showed that active advertising mediation (i.e. explaining the purpose and nature of advertising), and socio-oriented consumer communication (i.e. emphasizing control and restrictions) significantly reduced the impact of advertising on children's food consumption. Parental restrictions of advertising exposure were only effective among younger children (<8). These results suggest that critical discussion about advertising and rule making about consumption are most effective in countering the impact of food advertising.
本研究旨在探讨各种类型的父母沟通方式在改变儿童对电视食品广告反应方面的有效性。在一项针对 234 名 4 至 12 岁儿童父母的联合日记调查研究中,我调查了不同的广告中介(主动型与限制型)和消费者沟通(以概念为导向与以社会为导向)方式如何调节儿童广告暴露与他们对广告宣传的高能量食品消费之间的关系。回归中的交互分析表明,主动型广告中介(即解释广告的目的和性质)和以社会为导向的消费者沟通(即强调控制和限制)显著降低了广告对儿童食品消费的影响。对广告暴露的父母限制仅在年龄较小的儿童(<8 岁)中有效。这些结果表明,对广告进行批判性讨论和制定消费规则在抵制食品广告的影响方面最为有效。