Center for Anti-Infective Research and Development, Hartford Hospital, 80 Seymour Street, Hartford, CT 06102, USA.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 Feb;54(2):804-10. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01190-09. Epub 2009 Dec 7.
We have previously demonstrated that a high-dose, prolonged-infusion meropenem regimen (2 g every 8 h [q8h]; 3-hour infusion) can achieve 40% free drug concentration above the MIC against Pseudomonas aeruginosa with MICs of <or=16 microg/ml. The objective of this experiment was to compare the efficacy of this high-dose, prolonged-infusion regimen against carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates with the efficacy against P. aeruginosa isolates having similar meropenem MICs. An in vitro pharmacodynamic model was used to simulate human serum concentrations. Eleven genotypically confirmed K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing isolates and six clinical P. aeruginosa isolates were tested for 24 h, and time-kill curves were constructed. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to verify meropenem concentrations in each experiment. Meropenem achieved a rapid >or=3 log CFU reduction against all KPC isolates within 6 h, followed by regrowth in all but two isolates. The targeted %fT>MIC (percent time that free drug concentrations remain above the MIC) exposure was achieved against both of these KPC isolates (100% fT>MIC versus MIC=2 microg/ml, 75% fT>MIC versus MIC=8 microg/ml). Against KPC isolates with MICs of 8 and 16 microg/ml that did regrow, actual meropenem exposures were significantly lower than targeted due to rapid in vitro hydrolysis, whereby targeted %fT>MIC was reduced with each subsequent dosing. In contrast, a >or=3 log CFU reduction was maintained over 24 h for all Pseudomonas isolates with meropenem MICs of 8 and 16 microg/ml. Although KPC and P. aeruginosa isolates may share similar meropenem MICs, the differing resistance mechanisms produce discordant responses to a high-dose, prolonged infusion of meropenem. Thus, predicting the efficacy of an antimicrobial regimen based on MIC may not be a valid assumption for KPC-producing organisms.
我们之前已经证明,高剂量、长时间输注美罗培南方案(每 8 小时 2 g [q8h];3 小时输注)可以使 MIC 为 < 或 = 16 μg/ml 的铜绿假单胞菌达到 40%游离药物浓度高于 MIC。本实验的目的是比较这种高剂量、长时间输注方案对产碳青霉烯酶肺炎克雷伯菌分离株的疗效与对具有相似美罗培南 MIC 的铜绿假单胞菌分离株的疗效。使用体外药效动力学模型模拟人血清浓度。对 11 株基因确证的产 KPC 肺炎克雷伯菌分离株和 6 株临床铜绿假单胞菌分离株进行了 24 小时测试,并构建了时间杀伤曲线。高效液相色谱法(HPLC)用于验证每个实验中的美罗培南浓度。美罗培南在 6 小时内迅速使所有 KPC 分离株的 CFU 减少 > 或 = 3 对数,除两株外,所有分离株随后都有再生长。对这两株 KPC 分离株,目标 %fT>MIC(游离药物浓度高于 MIC 的时间百分比)暴露得到了实现(MIC=2 μg/ml 时 100% fT>MIC,MIC=8 μg/ml 时 75% fT>MIC)。对于 MIC 为 8 和 16 μg/ml 且有再生长的 KPC 分离株,由于快速体外水解,实际美罗培南暴露量显著低于目标值,从而导致每次后续给药时目标 %fT>MIC 降低。相比之下,所有 MIC 为 8 和 16 μg/ml 的铜绿假单胞菌分离株在 24 小时内都保持了 > 或 = 3 对数 CFU 的减少。尽管 KPC 和铜绿假单胞菌分离株可能具有相似的美罗培南 MIC,但不同的耐药机制对高剂量、长时间输注美罗培南产生了不一致的反应。因此,基于 MIC 预测抗菌治疗方案的疗效可能不是产 KPC 生物体的有效假设。