Suppr超能文献

经尿道中段吊带手术失败后重复经闭孔尿道悬吊带术:基于问卷评估的随访

Repeat transobturator tape after failed mid-urethral sling procedure: follow-up with questionnaire-based assessment.

作者信息

Van Baelen Anthony A A, Delaere Karl P J

机构信息

Department of Urology, Atrium Medical Centre, Heerlen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Urol Int. 2009;83(4):399-403. doi: 10.1159/000251178. Epub 2009 Dec 8.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if repeat transobturator tape (TOT) is feasible after failed initial synthetic mid-urethral sling (MUS) for stress urinary incontinence, and to ascertain objective physician-determined outcome as well as subjective questionnaire-based outcome for this procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between February 2005 and February 2008, a total of 21 patients underwent repeat TOT procedure after failed sling treatment. Initial sling procedures were all synthetic MUS, i.e. tension-free vaginal tape in 5 cases and TOT in 16 cases.

RESULTS

At a mean follow-up of 16 months, physician-determined cure was achieved in 55% of patients, improvement in 15% and failure in 30%. Outcome deduced from the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire at a mean follow-up of 17 months showed 53% of patients to be cured and 5% of patients to be improved, but failure was noted in 42% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat TOT after failed synthetic MUS treatment is a feasible procedure with minor morbidity. Repeat TOT provides a reasonable physician-determined success rate, but a lower patient self-reported success rate can be deduced from questionnaires. The transobturator approach seems to show poorer outcomes than the retropubic approach in repeat sling surgery.

摘要

目的

确定在初次合成材料的中段尿道吊带术(MUS)治疗压力性尿失禁失败后,重复经闭孔尿道中段吊带术(TOT)是否可行,并确定医生判定的客观结果以及基于问卷的主观结果。

患者与方法

2005年2月至2008年2月期间,共有21例患者在吊带治疗失败后接受了重复TOT手术。初次吊带手术均为合成材料的MUS,即5例为无张力阴道吊带术,16例为TOT。

结果

平均随访16个月时,医生判定55%的患者治愈,15%的患者改善,30%的患者失败。在平均随访17个月时,根据国际尿失禁咨询问卷得出的结果显示,53%的患者治愈,5%的患者改善,但42%的患者失败。

结论

在合成材料的MUS治疗失败后重复TOT是一种可行的手术,并发症较少。重复TOT在医生判定方面有合理的成功率,但从问卷中可推断出患者自我报告的成功率较低。在重复吊带手术中,经闭孔途径似乎比耻骨后途径的效果差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验