Center for Medial Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Am J Bioeth. 2009;9(6-7):3-10. doi: 10.1080/15265160902928209.
This study explores social networkers' interest in and attitudes toward personal genome testing (PGT), focusing on expectations related to the clinical integration of PGT results.
An online survey of 1,087 social networking users was conducted to assess 1) use and interest in PGT; 2) attitudes toward PGT companies and test results; and 3) expectations for the clinical integration of PGT. Descriptive statistics were calculated to summarize respondents' characteristics and responses.
Six percent of respondents have used PGT, 64% would consider using PGT, and 30% would not use PGT. Of those who would consider using PGT, 74% report they would use it to gain knowledge about disease in their family. 34% of all respondents consider the information obtained from PGT to be a medical diagnosis. 78% of those who would consider PGT would ask their physician for help interpreting test results, and 61% of all respondents believe physicians have a professional obligation to help individuals interpret PGT results.
Respondents express interest in using PGT services, primarily for purposes related to their medical care and expect physicians to help interpret PGT results. Physicians should therefore be prepared for patient demands for information and counsel on the basis of PGT results.
本研究探讨社交网络用户对个人基因组检测(PGT)的兴趣和态度,重点关注与 PGT 结果临床整合相关的预期。
对 1087 名社交网络用户进行了在线调查,以评估 1)对 PGT 的使用和兴趣;2)对 PGT 公司和测试结果的态度;3)对 PGT 临床整合的预期。计算描述性统计数据以总结受访者的特征和反应。
6%的受访者使用过 PGT,64%的受访者会考虑使用 PGT,30%的受访者不会使用 PGT。在考虑使用 PGT 的受访者中,74%表示他们将使用 PGT 来了解家族中的疾病信息。34%的受访者认为 PGT 获得的信息是医学诊断。78%的考虑使用 PGT 的受访者会要求医生帮助解读检测结果,而 61%的受访者认为医生有帮助个人解读 PGT 结果的专业义务。
受访者表示有兴趣使用 PGT 服务,主要是出于与他们的医疗保健相关的目的,并期望医生帮助解读 PGT 结果。因此,医生应该为患者对 PGT 结果的信息和咨询需求做好准备。