Lynch C F, Platz C E, Jones M P, Gazzaniga J M
Department of Preventive Medicine and Environmental Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City 52242.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1991 Mar 20;83(6):429-33. doi: 10.1093/jnci/83.6.429.
A slide review of diagnostic pathologic tissue obtained from 364 bladder cancer cases, identified through the Iowa Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program in 1983, classified 97 (26.6%) of these cases as invasive bladder cancers. These findings contrasted sharply with the Iowa SEER Program classification that coded 289 (79.4%) of these cases as invasive bladder cancers. These results were validated further by the hazard ratio of 4.54 (95% confidence interval, 2.57 to 8.03) among invasive relative to noninvasive bladder cancer cases when the slide review findings were used. In contrast, the hazard ratio was only 1.70 (95% confidence interval, 0.76 to 3.79) when the Iowa SEER Program findings were used. The traditional method used by the National Cancer Institute's SEER Program to deal with this problem is described and its implications are discussed.
对1983年通过艾奥瓦州监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)计划确定的364例膀胱癌病例的诊断病理组织进行玻片复查,将其中97例(26.6%)病例分类为浸润性膀胱癌。这些结果与艾奥瓦州SEER计划的分类形成鲜明对比,该计划将其中289例(79.4%)病例编码为浸润性膀胱癌。当采用玻片复查结果时,浸润性膀胱癌病例与非浸润性膀胱癌病例相比,风险比为4.54(95%置信区间为2.57至8.03),这进一步验证了上述结果。相比之下,采用艾奥瓦州SEER计划的结果时,风险比仅为1.70(95%置信区间为0.76至3.79)。描述了美国国立癌症研究所SEER计划处理该问题所采用的传统方法,并讨论了其影响。