Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.
J Natl Med Assoc. 2009 Nov;101(11):1132-9. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)31109-3.
Racial disparities in coronary revascularization--percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)--have been extensively documented. However, it is unclear whether disparities are consistent among patients with similar health insurance coverage. Our objective was to assess racial disparities in coronary revascularization among white, black, and Hispanic patients with similar insurance coverage hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).
We used 2000-2005 state inpatient data for 9 states to identify white, black, and Hispanic patients hospitalized with AMI. Patients were grouped into 3 health insurance cohorts: (1) Medicare, (2) private insurance, and (3) Medicaid/uninsured. We examined use of revascularization (PCI or CABG) among blacks and Hispanics as compared to whites in each of the 3 insurance cohorts.
The 418 study hospitals admitted 430509 AMI patients with Medicare, 238956 with private insurance, and 74926 patients who were uninsured/Medicaid. In unadjusted analyses, black and Hispanic patients were significantly less likely to receive in-hospital revascularization among the Medicare cohort (38.9% vs 44.9% vs 47.3%, P < .001), privately insured cohort (62.9% vs 69.7% vs 74.2%, P < .001), and uninsured/Medicaid cohort (55.2% vs 61.0% vs 68.4%, P <.001). In Cox models adjusting for patient demographics, comorbidity, and clustering of patients within hospitals, blacks were approximately 25% less likely and Hispanics 5% less likely to receive revascularization as compared to whites with similar insurance.
Blacks hospitalized with AMI are significantly less likely to receive revascularization when compared to whites and Hispanics with similar health insurance. Our data suggest that patients' ability to pay for costly procedures is unlikely to explain racial disparities.
经广泛证实,在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)和冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)方面,存在冠状动脉血运重建的种族差异。然而,在具有相似医疗保险的患者中,这些差异是否一致尚不清楚。我们的目的是评估具有相似保险覆盖的白人、黑人和西班牙裔患者因急性心肌梗死(AMI)住院时冠状动脉血运重建的种族差异。
我们使用了 9 个州 2000 年至 2005 年的州内住院数据,以确定因 AMI 住院的白人、黑人和西班牙裔患者。患者被分为 3 个医疗保险队列:(1)医疗保险,(2)私人保险,和(3)医疗补助/无保险。我们在每个医疗保险队列中检查了黑人患者和西班牙裔患者与白人患者相比,接受血管重建术(PCI 或 CABG)的情况。
418 家研究医院共收治了 430509 例因 AMI 而住院的患者,其中 238956 例为医疗保险患者,74926 例为无保险/医疗补助患者。在未调整的分析中,在医疗保险队列中,黑人患者和西班牙裔患者接受院内血管重建术的可能性显著低于白人患者(38.9%比 44.9%比 47.3%,P<.001),在私人保险队列中(62.9%比 69.7%比 74.2%,P<.001),以及无保险/医疗补助队列中(55.2%比 61.0%比 68.4%,P<.001)。在调整了患者人口统计学、合并症和医院内患者聚类的 Cox 模型中,黑人患者的血管重建率比白人患者低约 25%,西班牙裔患者的血管重建率比白人患者低 5%。
与具有相似医疗保险的白人患者和西班牙裔患者相比,因 AMI 住院的黑人患者接受血管重建术的可能性显著降低。我们的数据表明,患者支付昂贵手术费用的能力不太可能解释种族差异。