Gregory P M, Rhoads G G, Wilson A C, O'Dowd K J, Kostis J B
Health Services Research Program, Department of Family Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08903-0019, USA.
Am Heart J. 1999 Sep;138(3 Pt 1):507-17. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70154-7.
Reports indicate that black patients are less likely than white patients to receive invasive cardiac services after hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). There is still uncertainty as to why racial differences exist and how they affect patient outcomes. This is the first study to focus on the availability of invasive cardiac services and racial differences in procedure use. Study objectives were to (1) document whether racial differences existed in the use of invasive cardiac procedures, (2) study whether these racial differences were related to availability of hospital-based invasive cardiac services at first admission for AMI, and (3) determine whether there were racial differences in long-term mortality rates.
A historical cohort study was conducted with discharge records from all acute care hospitals in New Jersey for 1993 linked to death certificate records for 1993 and 1994. There were 13,690 black and white New Jersey residents hospitalized with primary diagnosis of AMI. Use of cardiac catheterization within 90 days, revascularization within 90 days (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [PTCA] or coronary artery bypass graft surgery [CABG]), and death within 1 year after admission for AMI were the main outcome measures. Patterns for PTCA and CABG as separate outcomes were also studied. Hospital-based cardiac services available were described as no invasive cardiac services, catheterization only, or PTCA/CABG. To account for payer status and comorbidity differences, patients 65 years and older with Medicare coverage were analyzed separately from those younger than 65 years.
Black patients aged 65 and older were generally less likely to receive catheterization and revascularization than white patients, regardless of facilities available at first admission. For patients younger than 65 years, the greatest differences between black and white patients in catheterization and PTCA/CABG use within 90 days after AMI occurred when no hospital-based invasive cardiac services were available. However, use of invasive cardiac procedures within 90 days after AMI was substantially increased if the first hospital offered catheterization only or PTCA/CABG services, among all patients, especially among blacks younger than age 65. No significant racial differences or interactions with available services were found in 1-year mortality rates.
Availability of invasive cardiac services at first hospitalization for AMI was associated with increased procedure use for both races. However, use of invasive cardiac procedures was generally lower for black patients than for white patients, regardless of services available. Long-term mortality rates after hospitalization for AMI did not differ between blacks and whites.
报告显示,急性心肌梗死(AMI)住院后,黑人患者接受侵入性心脏治疗的可能性低于白人患者。种族差异存在的原因及其如何影响患者预后仍不明确。这是第一项关注侵入性心脏治疗的可及性及治疗应用中种族差异的研究。研究目的为:(1)记录侵入性心脏治疗应用中是否存在种族差异;(2)研究这些种族差异是否与AMI首次入院时医院提供侵入性心脏治疗的可及性有关;(3)确定长期死亡率是否存在种族差异。
开展一项历史性队列研究,将新泽西州所有急症医院1993年的出院记录与1993年和1994年的死亡证明记录相链接。有13690名以AMI为主要诊断住院的新泽西州黑人和白人居民。主要结局指标为AMI入院后90天内的心脏导管插入术应用、90天内的血运重建术(经皮腔内冠状动脉成形术[PTCA]或冠状动脉旁路移植术[CABG])以及入院后1年内的死亡情况。还分别研究了PTCA和CABG作为单独结局的模式。医院提供的心脏治疗服务分为无侵入性心脏治疗服务、仅导管插入术或PTCA/CABG。为了考虑支付者状态和合并症差异,对65岁及以上有医疗保险的患者与65岁以下患者进行了分开分析。
65岁及以上的黑人患者通常比白人患者接受导管插入术和血运重建术的可能性更低,无论首次入院时的可用设施如何。对于65岁以下的患者,当没有医院提供侵入性心脏治疗服务时,AMI后90天内黑人和白人患者在导管插入术和PTCA/CABG应用方面的差异最大。然而,如果第一家医院仅提供导管插入术或PTCA/CABG服务,在所有患者中,尤其是65岁以下的黑人中,AMI后90天内侵入性心脏治疗的应用显著增加。在1年死亡率方面未发现显著的种族差异或与可用服务的相互作用。
AMI首次住院时侵入性心脏治疗服务的可及性与两个种族治疗应用的增加有关。然而,无论可用服务如何,黑人患者侵入性心脏治疗的应用通常低于白人患者。AMI住院后的长期死亡率在黑人和白人之间没有差异。