• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种族差异对心脏血运重建术的应用:当地医院的能力是否重要?

Racial disparities in the use of cardiac revascularization: does local hospital capacity matter?

机构信息

Department of Health Policy, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013 Jul 16;8(7):e69855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069855. Print 2013.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0069855
PMID:23875005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3713060/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the extent to which the observed racial disparities in cardiac revascularization use can be explained by the variation across counties where patients live, and how the within-county racial disparities is associated with the local hospital capacity.

DATA SOURCES

Administrative data from Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council (PHC4) between 1995 and 2006.

STUDY DESIGN

The study sample included 207,570 Medicare patients admitted to hospital for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We identified the use of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures within three months after the patient's initial admission for AMI. Multi-level hierarchical models were used to determine the extent to which racial disparities in procedure use were attributable to the variation in local hospital capacity.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Blacks were less likely than whites to receive CABG (9.1% vs. 5.8%; p<0.001) and PCI (15.7% vs. 14.2%; p<0.001). The state-level racial disparity in use rate decreases for CABG, and increases for PCI, with the county adjustment. Higher number of revascularization hospitals per 1,000 AMI patients was associated with smaller within-county racial differences in CABG and PCI rates. Meanwhile, very low capacity of catheterization suites and AMI hospitals contributed to significantly wider racial gap in PCI rate.

CONCLUSIONS

County variation in cardiac revascularization use rates helps explain the observed racial disparities. While smaller hospital capacity is associated with lower procedure rates for both racial groups, the impact is found to be larger on blacks. Therefore, consequences of fewer medical resources may be particularly pronounced for blacks, compared with whites.

摘要

目的

评估患者居住地所在县之间的差异在多大程度上可以解释观察到的心脏血运重建术使用方面的种族差异,以及县内种族差异与当地医院能力之间的关系。

资料来源

1995 年至 2006 年宾夕法尼亚州医疗保健费用控制委员会(PHC4)的行政数据。

研究设计

研究样本包括 207570 名因急性心肌梗死(AMI)住院的 Medicare 患者。我们确定了患者初次因 AMI 入院后三个月内冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的使用情况。采用多层次层次模型来确定种族差异在程序使用中的程度归因于当地医院能力的差异。

主要发现

与白人相比,黑人接受 CABG(9.1%比 5.8%;p<0.001)和 PCI(15.7%比 14.2%;p<0.001)的可能性较小。州一级的 CABG 使用率种族差异随着县一级的调整而降低,而 PCI 的种族差异则增加。每 1000 例 AMI 患者中接受血运重建术的医院数量越多,CABG 和 PCI 率的县内种族差异就越小。同时,导管插入术套房和 AMI 医院的能力极低导致 PCI 率的种族差距显著扩大。

结论

心脏血运重建术使用率的县差异有助于解释观察到的种族差异。虽然较小的医院容量与两个种族群体的手术率较低有关,但对黑人的影响更大。因此,与白人相比,医疗资源较少的后果可能对黑人来说更为明显。

相似文献

1
Racial disparities in the use of cardiac revascularization: does local hospital capacity matter?种族差异对心脏血运重建术的应用:当地医院的能力是否重要?
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 16;8(7):e69855. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069855. Print 2013.
2
Impact of availability of hospital-based invasive cardiac services on racial differences in the use of these services.医院侵入性心脏服务的可及性对这些服务使用中的种族差异的影响。
Am Heart J. 1999 Sep;138(3 Pt 1):507-17. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70154-7.
3
Racial disparities in revascularization rates among patients with similar insurance coverage.在具有相似保险覆盖范围的患者中,血管重建率存在种族差异。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2009 Nov;101(11):1132-9. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)31109-3.
4
Racial differences in cardiac revascularization rates: does "overuse" explain higher rates among white patients?心脏血管重建率的种族差异:“过度使用”能否解释白人患者较高的血管重建率?
Ann Intern Med. 2001 Sep 4;135(5):328-37. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-5-200109040-00009.
5
Understanding racial variation in the use of coronary revascularization procedures: the role of clinical factors.了解冠状动脉血运重建术使用中的种族差异:临床因素的作用。
Arch Intern Med. 2000 May 8;160(9):1329-35. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.9.1329.
6
Hospital-level racial disparities in acute myocardial infarction treatment and outcomes.医院层面急性心肌梗死治疗及预后的种族差异
Med Care. 2005 Apr;43(4):308-19. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000156848.62086.06.
7
Racial variation in the use of coronary-revascularization procedures. Are the differences real? Do they matter?冠状动脉血运重建术使用情况的种族差异。这些差异是真实存在的吗?它们重要吗?
N Engl J Med. 1997 Feb 13;336(7):480-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199702133360706.
8
Coronary revascularization and cardiac catheterization in the United States: trends in racial differences.美国的冠状动脉血运重建术和心导管插入术:种族差异趋势
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Jun;29(7):1557-62. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00089-2.
9
The use of percutaneous coronary intervention in black and white veterans with acute myocardial infarction.在患有急性心肌梗死的黑人和白人退伍军人中使用经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug 21;6:107. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-107.
10
Racial profiling: the unintended consequences of coronary artery bypass graft report cards.种族定性:冠状动脉搭桥手术报告卡的意外后果。
Circulation. 2005 Mar 15;111(10):1257-63. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000157729.59754.09.

引用本文的文献

1
Incidence and Characteristics of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Previous Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Single-Center Experience.既往冠状动脉旁路移植术患者ST段抬高型心肌梗死的发病率及特征:一项单中心经验
Cureus. 2025 Jun 29;17(6):e86978. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86978. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Sex and race disparities in emergency department patients with chest pain and a detectable or mildly elevated troponin.急诊科胸痛且肌钙蛋白可检测到或轻度升高患者中的性别和种族差异。
Am Heart J Plus. 2024 Dec 20;49:100495. doi: 10.1016/j.ahjo.2024.100495. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3
Racial Disparities in Access to High-Volume Mitral Valve Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair Centers.获得高容量二尖瓣经导管缘对缘修复中心的种族差异。
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Jul 13;1(5):100398. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100398. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
4
Causal fairness assessment of treatment allocation with electronic health records.基于电子健康记录的治疗分配的因果公平性评估。
J Biomed Inform. 2024 Jul;155:104656. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104656. Epub 2024 May 21.
5
Ethnic Disparities in Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCEs) and Postoperative Outcomes Following Coronary Artery Bypass in Northeastern Iran (2007-2016).伊朗东北部冠状动脉旁路手术后主要心脏和脑血管不良事件(MACCEs)及术后结局的种族差异(2007-2016 年)。
Arch Iran Med. 2023 Oct 1;26(10):554-560. doi: 10.34172/aim.2023.81.
6
Differential Treatment and Outcomes for Patients With Heart Attacks in Advantaged and Disadvantaged Communities.优势社区和劣势社区的心脏病患者的差异化治疗和结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Sep 5;12(17):e030506. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.030506. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
7
Racial disparities in women with ST elevation myocardial infarction: A National Inpatient Sample review of baseline characteristics, co-morbidities, and outcomes in women with STEMI.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死女性患者中的种族差异:国家住院患者样本对 STEMI 女性患者的基线特征、合并症和结局的回顾。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 Oct;46(10):1285-1295. doi: 10.1002/clc.24068. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
8
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Access to Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery.种族和民族在微创二尖瓣手术中的差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2247968. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.47968.
9
Racism and Cardiology: A Global Call to Action.种族主义与心脏病学:全球行动呼吁。
CJC Open. 2021 Sep 24;3(12 Suppl):S165-S173. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.09.014. eCollection 2021 Dec.
10
Impact of medicaid expansion on disparities in revascularization in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction.医疗补助扩张对急性心肌梗死住院患者血运重建差异的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 23;15(12):e0243385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243385. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Race and timeliness of transfer for revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction.种族与急性心肌梗死患者血运重建的及时程度。
Med Care. 2011 Jul;49(7):662-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31821d98b2.
2
Coronary revascularization trends in the United States, 2001-2008.美国 2001-2008 年冠状动脉血运重建趋势。
JAMA. 2011 May 4;305(17):1769-76. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.551.
3
Crowd-out and exposure effects of physical comorbidities on mental health care use: implications for racial-ethnic disparities in access.躯体共病对精神卫生保健使用的挤出和暴露效应:对获取途径中的种族-民族差异的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2011 Aug;46(4):1259-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01253.x. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
4
Aggressive treatment style and surgical outcomes.激进的治疗方式和手术结果。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Dec;45(6 Pt 2):1872-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01180.x. Epub 2010 Sep 28.
5
Racial and gender disparities in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement: are they due to overuse or underuse?种族和性别在植入式心脏复律除颤器中的差异:是过度使用还是使用不足?
Med Care Res Rev. 2011 Apr;68(2):226-46. doi: 10.1177/1077558710379421. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
6
Racial and ethnic differences in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction: findings from the Get With the Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease program.急性心肌梗死治疗中的种族和民族差异:来自 Get With The Guidelines-Coronary Artery Disease 项目的研究结果。
Circulation. 2010 Jun 1;121(21):2294-301. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.922286. Epub 2010 May 17.
7
Centralization of cancer surgery: implications for patient access to optimal care.癌症手术的集中化:对患者获得最佳治疗的影响。
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 1;27(28):4671-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.1715. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
8
Shortage of cardiothoracic surgeons is likely by 2020.到2020年,心胸外科医生短缺的情况可能会出现。
Circulation. 2009 Aug 11;120(6):488-94. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.776278. Epub 2009 Jul 27.
9
Percutaneous coronary interventions in facilities without cardiac surgery on site: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR).现场无心脏外科手术设施情况下的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:来自国家心血管数据注册库(NCDR)的报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jun 30;54(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.038.
10
Differences in specialist consultations for cardiovascular disease by race, ethnicity, gender, insurance status, and site of primary care.心血管疾病专科会诊在种族、族裔、性别、保险状况及初级保健地点方面的差异。
Circulation. 2009 May 12;119(18):2463-70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.825133. Epub 2009 Apr 27.