Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104-2321, USA.
J Fam Psychol. 2009 Dec;23(6):769-78. doi: 10.1037/a0016486.
Tensions are normative in the parent-child tie, but there is less information on the strategies used to cope with such tensions. This study examined strategies parents and adult children use in reaction to interpersonal tensions and the implications of those strategies for relationship quality. Parents and their adult sons and daughters (aged 22 to 49 years; N = 158 families, 474 individuals) reported the strategies they used in response to tensions with one another (constructive, destructive, and avoidant). Across dyads, parents and adult children reported using constructive strategies more often than destructive or avoidant strategies. Strategy use varied between and within dyads by generation, gender of parent, ethnicity, education, and age of child. Constructive strategies predicted better relationship quality, whereas avoidant and destructive strategies predicted poorer relationship quality. Parents may be more likely to use constructive strategies, which are meant to maintain the relationship because of their greater investment in the tie. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).
亲子关系中存在紧张是正常的,但对于应对这种紧张的策略,我们了解得较少。本研究考察了父母和成年子女在应对人际紧张时使用的策略,以及这些策略对关系质量的影响。父母及其 22 至 49 岁的成年子女(N=158 个家庭,474 人)报告了他们在彼此之间应对紧张时使用的策略(建设性、破坏性和回避性)。在不同的对子中,父母和成年子女报告说,他们更经常使用建设性策略,而不是破坏性或回避性策略。策略的使用在代际、父母的性别、种族、教育程度和子女的年龄之间存在差异。建设性策略预测关系质量更好,而回避性和破坏性策略则预测关系质量更差。父母可能更倾向于使用建设性策略,因为他们对关系的投入更大,所以这些策略旨在维持关系。(心理学文摘数据库记录(c)2009 APA,保留所有权利)。