• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人际紧张关系的暴露与反应中的年龄差异:一项日记研究

Age differences in exposure and reactions to interpersonal tensions: a daily diary study.

作者信息

Birditt Kira S, Fingerman Karen L, Almeida David M

机构信息

Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 426 Thompson Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48104-2321, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 2005 Jun;20(2):330-40. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.20.2.330.

DOI:10.1037/0882-7974.20.2.330
PMID:16029096
Abstract

This study examines age differences in exposure and reactivity to interpersonal tensions. The data are from the National Study of Daily Experiences in which participants ages 25 to 74 (N = 666) completed phone interviews wherein they described interpersonal tensions and rated the stressfulness of the tensions each evening for 8 days. Coders rated descriptions for types of behavioral reactions. Multilevel models revealed older adults reported fewer interpersonal tensions, were more likely to report tensions with spouses, were less likely to report tensions with children, experienced less stress, and were less likely to argue and more likely to do nothing in response to tensions than were younger adults. Age differences in emotional and behavioral reactions did not appear to be due to variations in exposure to tensions. The discussion centers on why older people may be better able to regulate their reactions to problems than younger people.

摘要

本研究考察了人际紧张情境下暴露程度及反应的年龄差异。数据来自“日常经历全国性研究”,该研究中25至74岁的参与者(N = 666)完成了电话访谈,他们描述了人际紧张情境,并在8天里每晚对紧张情境的压力程度进行评分。编码员对行为反应类型的描述进行评分。多层次模型显示,与年轻人相比,老年人报告的人际紧张情境较少,更有可能报告与配偶之间的紧张关系,不太可能报告与子女之间的紧张关系,经历的压力较小,面对紧张情境时争吵的可能性较小,无所作为的可能性较大。情绪和行为反应的年龄差异似乎并非由于暴露于紧张情境的差异所致。讨论集中于为何老年人可能比年轻人更善于调节对问题的反应。

相似文献

1
Age differences in exposure and reactions to interpersonal tensions: a daily diary study.人际紧张关系的暴露与反应中的年龄差异:一项日记研究
Psychol Aging. 2005 Jun;20(2):330-40. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.20.2.330.
2
Perceptions of social transgressions in adulthood.对成年期社会违规行为的认知。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009 Sep;64(5):551-9. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp062. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
3
Do we get better at picking our battles? Age group differences in descriptions of behavioral reactions to interpersonal tensions.我们在选择斗争对象方面是否变得更擅长了?不同年龄组对人际紧张关系行为反应的描述差异。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2005 May;60(3):P121-8. doi: 10.1093/geronb/60.3.p121.
4
Memories of social interactions: age differences in emotional intensity.社交互动记忆:情绪强度的年龄差异。
Psychol Aging. 2007 Jun;22(2):300-9. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.2.300.
5
The experience of anger and sadness in everyday problems impacts age differences in emotion regulation.在日常问题中愤怒和悲伤的体验会影响情绪调节方面的年龄差异。
Dev Psychol. 2008 Nov;44(6):1547-56. doi: 10.1037/a0013915.
6
Age and gender differences in adults' descriptions of emotional reactions to interpersonal problems.成年人对人际问题情绪反应描述中的年龄和性别差异。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2003 Jul;58(4):P237-45. doi: 10.1093/geronb/58.4.p237.
7
Daily interpersonal tensions and well-being among older adults: The role of emotion regulation strategies.老年人的日常人际紧张与幸福感:情绪调节策略的作用。
Psychol Aging. 2020 Jun;35(4):578-590. doi: 10.1037/pag0000416. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
8
Emotion regulation in interpersonal problems: the role of cognitive-emotional complexity, emotion regulation goals, and expressivity.人际问题中的情绪调节:认知-情绪复杂性、情绪调节目标和表达能力的作用。
Psychol Aging. 2008 Mar;23(1):39-51. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.23.1.39.
9
Age differences in forgiveness: the role of future time perspective.宽恕中的年龄差异:未来时间视角的作用。
Psychol Aging. 2008 Sep;23(3):676-80. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.23.3.676.
10
Reflecting on self-relevant experiences: adult age differences.反思与自我相关的经验:成人年龄差异。
Dev Psychol. 2010 Mar;46(2):479-90. doi: 10.1037/a0018098.

引用本文的文献

1
The Advantages of Seeing the Silver Lining: How Valuing Emotions Moderates the Link Between Ambivalent Ties and Daily Health.看到事情积极面的好处:重视情绪如何缓和矛盾关系与日常健康之间的联系。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaf124.
2
Loneliness and subjective cognitive concerns in daily life.日常生活中的孤独感与主观认知问题。
Aging Ment Health. 2025 Jun 20:1-9. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2025.2519672.
3
Potential stressors in (prospective) physical education teachers: a comparison of different career stages.
(未来的)体育教师潜在的压力源:不同职业阶段的比较
Ger J Exerc Sport Res. 2022;52(4):596-611. doi: 10.1007/s12662-022-00804-3. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
4
Prevalence of stress associated oral mucosal disorders among patients from Southern Rajasthan, India.印度拉贾斯坦邦南部患者中应激相关口腔黏膜疾病的患病率。
Bioinformation. 2024 Jul 31;20(7):754-756. doi: 10.6026/973206300200754. eCollection 2024.
5
Understanding the Mental Health of Students and Professors within Universities: a Cross-sectional, Multicultural Analysis across Three European Countries.了解大学内学生和教授的心理健康:一项对三个欧洲国家的横断面多元文化分析。
Invest Educ Enferm. 2025 Apr;43(1). doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v43n1e08.
6
Multidimensional correlates of psychological stress: Insights from traditional statistical approaches and machine learning using a nationally representative Canadian sample.心理压力的多维关联:来自传统统计方法和使用具有全国代表性的加拿大样本的机器学习的见解。
PLoS One. 2025 May 13;20(5):e0323197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323197. eCollection 2025.
7
Intersection of age and gender: Links between negative interpersonal interactions and both blood pressure and mood in daily life.年龄与性别的交叉影响:日常生活中负面人际互动与血压及情绪之间的联系。
Health Psychol. 2025 May;44(5):456-466. doi: 10.1037/hea0001435.
8
How Often and Why Do People Manage Their Emotions in Older Adulthood?老年人管理情绪的频率及原因是什么?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2025 May 8;80(6). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaf031.
9
Navigating life's twists and turns: characteristics of life events across adulthood.应对生活的曲折:成年期生活事件的特征
Eur J Ageing. 2025 Jan 20;22(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s10433-025-00838-0.
10
Perceived stress across population segments characterized by differing stressor profiles-A latent class analysis.以不同应激源特征为特点的人群亚组中的感知压力——潜在类别分析
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 16;20(1):e0316759. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316759. eCollection 2025.